kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq()
@ 2020-08-05 11:38 Zhu Lingshan
  2020-08-05 11:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhu Lingshan @ 2020-08-05 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jasowang, mst
  Cc: virtualization, netdev, kvm, eli, shahafs, parav, Zhu Lingshan

This commit merge vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq() logics into
vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), so that code are unified.

In vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), added checks for the existence
for get_vq_irq().

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index 26f166a8192e..044e1f54582a 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -122,8 +122,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
 	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
 	int ret, irq;
 
-	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
+	if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
+		return;
+
 	irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
+	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
+	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
 	if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
 		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
 		return;
@@ -144,26 +148,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
 	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
 }
 
-static void vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
-{
-	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
-	/*
-	 * if it has a non-zero irq, means there is a
-	 * previsouly registered irq_bypass_producer,
-	 * we should update it when ctx (its token)
-	 * changes.
-	 */
-	if (!vq->call_ctx.producer.irq) {
-		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
-	vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
-	irq_bypass_register_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
-	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
-}
-
 static void vhost_vdpa_reset(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
 {
 	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
@@ -452,7 +436,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
 			cb.private = NULL;
 		}
 		ops->set_vq_cb(vdpa, idx, &cb);
-		vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(vq);
+		vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, idx);
 		break;
 
 	case VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM:
-- 
2.18.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq()
  2020-08-05 11:38 [PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq() Zhu Lingshan
@ 2020-08-05 11:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-08-05 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhu Lingshan; +Cc: jasowang, virtualization, netdev, kvm, eli, shahafs, parav

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 07:38:32PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit merge vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq() logics into
> vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), so that code are unified.
> 
> In vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), added checks for the existence
> for get_vq_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>

which commit should I squash this into?

commit f8e695e9dbd88464bc3d1f01769229dedf8f30d6
Author: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 14:55:31 2020 +0800

    vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
    

this one?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 26f166a8192e..044e1f54582a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -122,8 +122,12 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>  	int ret, irq;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> +	if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
> +		return;
> +
>  	irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
> +	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> +	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
>  	if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
>  		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>  		return;
> @@ -144,26 +148,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>  	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static void vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> -{
> -	spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -	/*
> -	 * if it has a non-zero irq, means there is a
> -	 * previsouly registered irq_bypass_producer,
> -	 * we should update it when ctx (its token)
> -	 * changes.
> -	 */
> -	if (!vq->call_ctx.producer.irq) {
> -		spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> -	vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> -	irq_bypass_register_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> -	spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> -}
> -
>  static void vhost_vdpa_reset(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
>  {
>  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> @@ -452,7 +436,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
>  			cb.private = NULL;
>  		}
>  		ops->set_vq_cb(vdpa, idx, &cb);
> -		vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq(vq);
> +		vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, idx);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM:
> -- 
> 2.18.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-05 17:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-05 11:38 [PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq() Zhu Lingshan
2020-08-05 11:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).