[PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Another set of CSV2-related fixes

[PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Another set of CSV2-related fixes

[Marc Zyngier]

This small series addresses a couple of Spectre-v2 related issues:

- Fix a live migration regression introduced with the setting of CSV2
  on systems that are not affected by Spectre-v2, but that don't
  directly expose it in ID_AA64PFR0_EL1

- Inject an UNDEF exception if the guest tries to access any of
  SCXTNUM_ELx, as we don't advertise it to guests.

Patches on top of 5.10-rc2.

Marc Zyngier (3):
  KVM: arm64: Allow setting of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 from userspace
  KVM: arm64: Rename access_amu() to undef_access()
  KVM: arm64: Handle SCXTNUM_ELx traps

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h   |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 16 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0

[PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Allow setting of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 from userspace

[Marc Zyngier]

We now expose ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2=1 to guests running on hosts
that are immune to Spectre-v2, but that don't have this field set,
most likely because they predate the specification.

However, this prevents the migration of guests that have started on
a host the doesn't fake this CSV2 setting to one that does, as KVM
rejects the write to ID_AA64PFR0_EL2 on the grounds that it isn't
what is already there.

In order to fix this, allow userspace to set this field as long as
this doesn't result in a promising more than what is already there
(setting CSV2 to 0 is acceptable, but setting it to 1 when it is
already set to 0 isn't).

Fixes: e1026237f9067 ("KVM: arm64: Set CSV2 for guests on hardware unaffected by Spectre-v2")
Reported-by: Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 16 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 781d029b8aa8..0cd9f0f75c13 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
 	 */
 	unsigned long *pmu_filter;
 	unsigned int pmuver;
+
+	u8 pfr0_csv2;
 };
 
 struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 5750ec34960e..c0ffb019ca8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -102,6 +102,20 @@ static int kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus(void)
 	return vgic_present ? kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus() : KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
 }
 
+static void set_default_csv2(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
+	 * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
+	 * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
+	 *
+	 * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
+	 * the impossible.
+	 */
+	if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
+		kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = 1;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_arch_init_vm - initializes a VM data structure
  * @kvm:	pointer to the KVM struct
@@ -127,6 +141,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
 	/* The maximum number of VCPUs is limited by the host's GIC model */
 	kvm->arch.max_vcpus = kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus();
 
+	set_default_csv2(kvm);
+
 	return ret;
 out_free_stage2_pgd:
 	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index fb12d3ef423a..61789027b92b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1128,9 +1128,8 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
 			val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
 		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
-		if (!(val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT)) &&
-		    arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
-			val |= (1UL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
+		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
+		val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
 	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
 		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
 	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 && !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
@@ -1260,6 +1259,36 @@ static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
+			       const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
+{
+	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
+	int err;
+	u64 val;
+	u8 csv2;
+
+	err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	/*
+	 * Allow AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 to be set from userspace as long as
+	 * it doesn't promise more than what is actually provided (the
+	 * guest could otherwise be covered in ectoplasmic residue).
+	 */
+	csv2 = FIELD_GET(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, val);
+	if (csv2 > vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = csv2;
+
+	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
+	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, false))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * cpufeature ID register user accessors
  *
@@ -1514,7 +1543,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 
 	/* AArch64 ID registers */
 	/* CRm=4 */
-	ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1),
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
+	  .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, },
 	ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
-- 
2.28.0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Allow setting of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 from userspace

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:14:43PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We now expose ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2=1 to guests running on hosts
> that are immune to Spectre-v2, but that don't have this field set,
> most likely because they predate the specification.
> 
> However, this prevents the migration of guests that have started on
> a host the doesn't fake this CSV2 setting to one that does, as KVM
> rejects the write to ID_AA64PFR0_EL2 on the grounds that it isn't
> what is already there.
> 
> In order to fix this, allow userspace to set this field as long as
> this doesn't result in a promising more than what is already there
> (setting CSV2 to 0 is acceptable, but setting it to 1 when it is
> already set to 0 isn't).
> 
> Fixes: e1026237f9067 ("KVM: arm64: Set CSV2 for guests on hardware unaffected by Spectre-v2")
> Reported-by: Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 16 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 781d029b8aa8..0cd9f0f75c13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  	 */
>  	unsigned long *pmu_filter;
>  	unsigned int pmuver;
> +
> +	u8 pfr0_csv2;
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 5750ec34960e..c0ffb019ca8b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,20 @@ static int kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus(void)
>  	return vgic_present ? kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus() : KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
>  }
>  
> +static void set_default_csv2(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
> +	 * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
> +	 * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
> +	 *
> +	 * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
> +	 * the impossible.
> +	 */
> +	if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
> +		kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = 1;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_arch_init_vm - initializes a VM data structure
>   * @kvm:	pointer to the KVM struct
> @@ -127,6 +141,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	/* The maximum number of VCPUs is limited by the host's GIC model */
>  	kvm->arch.max_vcpus = kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus();
>  
> +	set_default_csv2(kvm);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  out_free_stage2_pgd:
>  	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index fb12d3ef423a..61789027b92b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1128,9 +1128,8 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
>  			val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
>  		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
> -		if (!(val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT)) &&
> -		    arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
> -			val |= (1UL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
> +		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
> +		val |= ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
>  	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
>  		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
>  	} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 && !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
> @@ -1260,6 +1259,36 @@ static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> +			       const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
> +{
> +	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
> +	int err;
> +	u64 val;
> +	u8 csv2;
> +
> +	err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Allow AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 to be set from userspace as long as
> +	 * it doesn't promise more than what is actually provided (the
> +	 * guest could otherwise be covered in ectoplasmic residue).
> +	 */
> +	csv2 = FIELD_GET(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, val);

cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field() instead?

> +	if (csv2 > vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = csv2;
> +
> +	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> +	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, false))
> +		return -EINVAL;

I think it's quite confusing to return -EINVAL in the case that we have
actually updated arch.pfr0_csv2, as it's indistinguishable from the case
when csv2 was invalid and the field wasn't updated.

Will

Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Allow setting of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 from userspace

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2020-11-05 22:44, Will Deacon wrote:

>> +	if (csv2 > vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = csv2;
>> +
>> +	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
>> +	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, false))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> I think it's quite confusing to return -EINVAL in the case that we have
> actually updated arch.pfr0_csv2, as it's indistinguishable from the 
> case
> when csv2 was invalid and the field wasn't updated.

-EINVAL is the right error code here (you're setting an invalid value 
for
the whole register). The bug is that we have now changed CSV2 for 
everyone.

I'll have a look at fixing this, though it might involve some locking.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Rename access_amu() to undef_access()

[Marc Zyngier]

The only thing that access_amu() does is to inject an UNDEF exception,
so let's rename it to the clearer undef_access(). We'll reuse that
for some other system registers.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 61789027b92b..fafaa81bf1f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1038,8 +1038,8 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)),					\
 	  access_pmu_evtyper, reset_unknown, (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
 
-static bool access_amu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
-			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
+			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 
@@ -1047,10 +1047,10 @@ static bool access_amu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 }
 
 /* Macro to expand the AMU counter and type registers*/
-#define AMU_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(n)), access_amu }
-#define AMU_AMEVTYPER0_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVTYPER0_EL0(n)), access_amu }
-#define AMU_AMEVCNTR1_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVCNTR1_EL0(n)), access_amu }
-#define AMU_AMEVTYPER1_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVTYPER1_EL0(n)), access_amu }
+#define AMU_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(n)), undef_access }
+#define AMU_AMEVTYPER0_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVTYPER0_EL0(n)), undef_access }
+#define AMU_AMEVCNTR1_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVCNTR1_EL0(n)), undef_access }
+#define AMU_AMEVTYPER1_EL0(n) { SYS_DESC(SYS_AMEVTYPER1_EL0(n)), undef_access }
 
 static bool trap_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
@@ -1679,14 +1679,14 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL0), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDR_EL0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDRRO_EL0), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDRRO_EL0 },
 
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCR_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCFGR_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCGCR_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMUSERENR_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENCLR0_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENSET0_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENCLR1_EL0), access_amu },
-	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENSET1_EL0), access_amu },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCR_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCFGR_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCGCR_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMUSERENR_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENCLR0_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENSET0_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENCLR1_EL0), undef_access },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCNTENSET1_EL0), undef_access },
 	AMU_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(0),
 	AMU_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(1),
 	AMU_AMEVCNTR0_EL0(2),
-- 
2.28.0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Rename access_amu() to undef_access()

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:14:44PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The only thing that access_amu() does is to inject an UNDEF exception,
> so let's rename it to the clearer undef_access(). We'll reuse that
> for some other system registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 61789027b92b..fafaa81bf1f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1038,8 +1038,8 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)),					\
>  	  access_pmu_evtyper, reset_unknown, (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
>  
> -static bool access_amu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> -			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
>  	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);

This seems to be identical to trap_ptrauth(). Shall we give it the same
treatment?

Will

Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Rename access_amu() to undef_access()

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2020-11-05 22:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:14:44PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> The only thing that access_amu() does is to inject an UNDEF exception,
>> so let's rename it to the clearer undef_access(). We'll reuse that
>> for some other system registers.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 61789027b92b..fafaa81bf1f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -1038,8 +1038,8 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu 
>> *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)),					\
>>  	  access_pmu_evtyper, reset_unknown, (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
>> 
>> -static bool access_amu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params 
>> *p,
>> -			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>> +static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params 
>> *p,
>> +			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>>  {
>>  	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> 
> This seems to be identical to trap_ptrauth(). Shall we give it the same
> treatment?

Yes. MTE is also doing the same thing, so let's grind them all.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Handle SCXTNUM_ELx traps

[Marc Zyngier]

As the kernel never sets HCR_EL2.EnSCXT, accesses to SCXTNUM_ELx
will trap to EL2. Let's handle that as gracefully as possible
by injecting an UNDEF exception into the guest. This is consistent
with the guest's view of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 being at most 1.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 174817ba119c..e2ef4c2edf06 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@
 #define SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 13, 0, 1)
 #define SYS_TPIDR_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 13, 0, 4)
 
+#define SYS_SCXTNUM_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 13, 0, 7)
+
 #define SYS_CNTKCTL_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 14, 1, 0)
 
 #define SYS_CCSIDR_EL1			sys_reg(3, 1, 0, 0, 0)
@@ -404,6 +406,8 @@
 #define SYS_TPIDR_EL0			sys_reg(3, 3, 13, 0, 2)
 #define SYS_TPIDRRO_EL0			sys_reg(3, 3, 13, 0, 3)
 
+#define SYS_SCXTNUM_EL0			sys_reg(3, 3, 13, 0, 7)
+
 /* Definitions for system register interface to AMU for ARMv8.4 onwards */
 #define SYS_AM_EL0(crm, op2)		sys_reg(3, 3, 13, (crm), (op2))
 #define SYS_AMCR_EL0			SYS_AM_EL0(2, 0)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index fafaa81bf1f6..d66930edb60c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1651,6 +1651,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL1, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDR_EL1 },
 
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCXTNUM_EL1), undef_access },
+
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTKCTL_EL1), NULL, reset_val, CNTKCTL_EL1, 0},
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CCSIDR_EL1), access_ccsidr },
@@ -1679,6 +1681,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL0), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDR_EL0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDRRO_EL0), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDRRO_EL0 },
 
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCXTNUM_EL0), undef_access },
+
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCR_EL0), undef_access },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCFGR_EL0), undef_access },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMCGCR_EL0), undef_access },
-- 
2.28.0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Handle SCXTNUM_ELx traps

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:14:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> As the kernel never sets HCR_EL2.EnSCXT, accesses to SCXTNUM_ELx
> will trap to EL2. Let's handle that as gracefully as possible
> by injecting an UNDEF exception into the guest. This is consistent
> with the guest's view of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 being at most 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Will