kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:05:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-8-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:03 +0000
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

Hi,

> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> 
> ARM v8.3 introduces a new bit in the HCR_EL2, which is the NV bit. When
> this bit is set, accessing EL2 registers in EL1 traps to EL2. In
> addition, executing the following instructions in EL1 will trap to EL2:
> tlbi, at, eret, and msr/mrs instructions to access SP_EL1. Most of the
> instructions that trap to EL2 with the NV bit were undef at EL1 prior to
> ARM v8.3. The only instruction that was not undef is eret.
> 
> This patch sets up a handler for EL2 registers and SP_EL1 register
> accesses at EL1. The host hypervisor keeps those register values in
> memory, and will emulate their behavior.
> 
> This patch doesn't set the NV bit yet. It will be set in a later patch
> once nested virtualization support is completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
> [maz: added SCTLR_EL2 RES0/RES1 handling]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

I compared the system register encodings in the first hunk against the
ARMv8 ARM, they are all fine.
I also checked the last hunk for (copy&paste) typos, all good as well.

Some comments below:

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  44 ++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 82521cdbfc1c..05b49eafbb49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -469,19 +469,50 @@
>  
>  #define SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0		sys_reg(3, 3, 14, 15, 7)
>  
> +#define SYS_VPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_VMPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 0, 0, 5)
> +
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_ACTLR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_HCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_MDCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 1)
> +#define SYS_CPTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 2)
> +#define SYS_HSTR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 3)
> +#define SYS_HACR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 1, 7)
> +
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 1, 2, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_TTBR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_TTBR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VTTBR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_VTCR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 2, 1, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_AFSR0_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 0)
> +#define SYS_AFSR1_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 0)
>  #define SYS_VSESR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 2, 3)
>  #define SYS_FPEXC32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 3, 0)
>  #define SYS_TFSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 6, 0)
>  #define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
>  
> -#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1,  1)
> +#define SYS_FAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_HPFAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 6, 0, 4)
> +
> +#define SYS_MAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 2, 0)
> +#define SYS_AMAIR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 10, 3, 0)
> +
> +#define SYS_VBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 0)
> +#define SYS_RVBAR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_RMR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 0, 2)
> +#define SYS_VDISR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 1, 1)
>  #define __SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(x)		sys_reg(3, 4, 12, 8, x)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R0_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(0)
>  #define SYS_ICH_AP0R1_EL2		__SYS__AP0Rx_EL2(1)
> @@ -523,15 +554,24 @@
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR14_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(6)
>  #define SYS_ICH_LR15_EL2		__SYS__LR8_EL2(7)
>  
> +#define SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2		sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 1)
> +#define SYS_TPIDR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 13, 0, 2)
> +
> +#define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
> +#define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* VHE encodings for architectural EL0/1 system registers */
>  #define SYS_SCTLR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_CPACR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 0, 2)
>  #define SYS_ZCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 1, 2, 0)
> +
>  #define SYS_TTBR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_TTBR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 1)
>  #define SYS_TCR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 2, 0, 2)
> +
>  #define SYS_SPSR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 0)
>  #define SYS_ELR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 4, 0, 1)
> +
>  #define SYS_AFSR0_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 0)
>  #define SYS_AFSR1_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 1, 1)
>  #define SYS_ESR_EL12			sys_reg(3, 5, 5, 2, 0)
> @@ -549,6 +589,8 @@
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CTL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 1)
>  #define SYS_CNTV_CVAL_EL02		sys_reg(3, 5, 14, 3, 2)
>  
> +#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6,  4, 1, 0)
> +
>  /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_DSSBS	(BIT(44))
>  #define SCTLR_ELx_ATA	(BIT(43))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 3313dedfa505..c049867a39bc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,57 @@ static u32 get_ccsidr(u32 csselr)
>  	return ccsidr;
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	else
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +		      struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +		      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		return ignore_write(vcpu, p);
> +
> +	p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_sctlr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			     struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			     const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write) {
> +		u64 val = p->regval;
> +
> +		if (vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) && vcpu_el2_tge_is_set(vcpu)) {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | GENMASK_ULL(34, 32) |

In ARMv8 ARM F.c bits 49-45 are used for the TWE delay value. The
manual says it's RES0 when FEAT_TWED is not implemented, but this is
true for a lot of other feature bits we don't implement? So shall we
let a guest set them, reducing the mask to (63,50)?

> +				 BIT_ULL(17));

The ARMv8 ARM F.c lists bit 9 as RES0 as well for (E2H,TGE)=(1,1).

> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL1_RES1;
> +		} else {
> +			val &= ~(GENMASK_ULL(63,45) | BIT_ULL(42) |
> +				 GENMASK_ULL(39, 38) | GENMASK_ULL(35, 32) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(26) | BIT_ULL(24) | BIT_ULL(20) |
> +				 BIT_ULL(17) | GENMASK_ULL(15, 14) |
> +				 GENMASK(10, 7));
> +			val |=  SCTLR_EL2_RES1;
> +		}
> +
> +		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, val, r->reg);
> +	} else {
> +		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
>   */
> @@ -342,12 +393,9 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  			    const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
> -	if (p->is_write) {
> -		vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, r->reg);
> +	access_rw(vcpu, p, r);
> +	if (p->is_write)
>  		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY;
> -	} else {
> -		p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> -	}
>  
>  	trace_trap_reg(__func__, r->reg, p->is_write, p->regval);
>  
> @@ -1314,6 +1362,18 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	.set_user = set_raz_id_reg,		\
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
> +			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	if (p->is_write)
> +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1) = p->regval;
> +	else
> +		p->regval = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, SP_EL1);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Architected system registers.
>   * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
> @@ -1692,9 +1752,51 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	 */
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMCCFILTR_EL0), access_pmu_evtyper, reset_val, PMCCFILTR_EL0, 0 },
>  
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VMPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VMPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCTLR_EL2), access_sctlr_el2, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2, SCTLR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ACTLR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ACTLR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MDCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MDCR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CPTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_EL2, CPTR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HSTR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HSTR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HACR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HACR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TTBR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TCR_EL2, TCR_EL2_RES1 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTTBR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTTBR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 },
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
> +
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR0_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR0_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AFSR1_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AFSR1_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ESR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ESR_EL2, 0 },
>  	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, FAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_HPFAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, HPFAR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, MAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AMAIR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, AMAIR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_VBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RVBAR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, RVBAR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_RMR_EL2), access_wi, reset_val, RMR_EL2, 1 },


Why is this WI, exactly? Isn't EL2 the highest implemented EL from a
guest's point of view, and thus a write to RMR_EL2 with bit 1 set should
trigger a reset (to AArch64)?
I see that we don't NEED to implement this register (as we don't
support AArch32), but that should look differently here then?

The rest looks alright to me.

Cheers,
Andre

> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CONTEXTIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CONTEXTIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TPIDR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, TPIDR_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
> +
> +	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, SP_EL2 },
>  };
>  
>  static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 15:58 [PATCH v3 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/66] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce nested virtualization VCPU feature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VCPU to EL2 registers if VCPU nested virt is set Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:04   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested virt VCPU primitives for vEL2 VCPU state Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.NV system register traps Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:05   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Reset VMPIDR_EL2 and VPIDR_EL2 to sane values Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support virtual EL2 exceptions Marc Zyngier
2021-01-29 18:05   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 22:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle trapped ERET from " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add non-VHE-EL2->EL1 translation helpers Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle virtual EL2 registers in vcpu_read/write_sys_reg() Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 15/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.E2H specially Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Save/Restore vEL2 sysregs Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate PSTATE.M for a guest hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 18/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 19/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 20/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 21/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 22/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 23/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.{TFP,FPEN} settings Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 24/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 25/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 26/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 27/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 28/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Forward debug traps to the nested guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 29/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for nested virtualization Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 30/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Only toggle cache for virtual EL2 when SCTLR_EL2 changes Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 31/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Filter out unsupported features from ID regs Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 32/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Hide RAS from nested guests Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 33/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Support multiple nested Stage-2 mmu structures Marc Zyngier
2021-01-21  2:59   ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-16 18:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 34/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested Stage-2 page table walk logic Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 35/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle shadow stage 2 page faults Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 36/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Restrict S2 RD/WR permissions to match the guest's Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 37/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Unmap/flush shadow stage 2 page tables Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 38/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce sys_reg_desc.forward_trap Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 39/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Set a handler for the system instruction traps Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 40/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate AT instructions from virtual EL2 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 41/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Trap and emulate TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 42/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fold guest's HCR_EL2 configuration into the host's Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 43/66] KVM: arm64: nv: arch_timer: Support hyp timer emulation Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 44/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of EL2-specific timer registers Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 45/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Load timer before the GIC Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 46/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Nested GICv3 Support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 47/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't load the GICv4 context on entering a nested guest Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 48/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Emulate the HW bit in software Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 49/66] KVM: arm64: nv: vgic: Allow userland to set VGIC maintenance IRQ Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 50/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement maintenance interrupt forwarding Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 51/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested GICv3 tracepoints Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 52/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow userspace to request KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 53/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of ARMv8.4-TTL TLB invalidation Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 54/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Invalidate TLBs based on shadow S2 TTL-like information Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 55/66] KVM: arm64: Allow populating S2 SW bits Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 56/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Tag shadow S2 entries with nested level Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 57/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Add include containing the VNCR_EL2 offsets Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 58/66] KVM: arm64: Map VNCR-capable registers to a separate page Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 59/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Move nested vgic state into the sysreg file Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 60/66] KVM: arm64: Add ARMv8.4 Enhanced Nested Virt cpufeature Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 61/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Synchronize PSTATE early on exit Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 62/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with ARMv8.4 Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 63/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate VNCR page when required Marc Zyngier
2021-01-21  2:47   ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-16 19:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 64/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Enable ARMv8.4-NV support Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 65/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track 'InHost' exception returns Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 66/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Fast-track EL1 TLBIs for VHE guests Marc Zyngier
     [not found] ` <CAJc+Z1GFHp17+ROTyDnfS4QLs0kCEVBCD7+OBkHZA53q-zmiLQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-11  8:59   ` [PATCH v3 00/66] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Marc Zyngier
2021-01-12  8:02     ` Haibo Xu
2021-01-18 17:38 ` André Przywara
2021-01-21  3:03 ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-04  7:51   ` Haibo Xu
2021-02-17 22:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-02-23  9:43       ` Haibo Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210129180514.58d7a261@slackpad.fritz.box \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).