kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:52:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210314155225.206661-3-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210314155225.206661-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>

If the platform supports LBR_INFO register, the x86_pmu.lbr_info will
be assigned in intel_pmu_?_lbr_init_?() and it's safe to expose LBR_INFO
in the x86_perf_get_lbr() directly, instead of relying on lbr_format check.

Also Architectural LBR has IA32_LBR_x_INFO instead of LBR_FORMAT_INFO_x
to hold metadata for the operation, including mispredict, TSX, and
elapsed cycle time information.

Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 21890dacfcfe..355ea70f1879 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1832,12 +1832,10 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
  */
 int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
 {
-	int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
-
 	lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
 	lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
 	lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
-	lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
+	lbr->info = x86_pmu.lbr_info;
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-14 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-14 15:52 [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Guest Architectural LBR Enabling Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` Like Xu [this message]
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] perf/x86/lbr: Skip checking for the existence of LBR_TOS for Arch LBR Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] perf/x86/lbr: Move cpuc->lbr_xsave allocation out of sleeping region Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] perf/x86: Move ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK definition to include/asm/msr-index.h Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH emulation for Arch LBR Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add Arch LBR emulation and its VMCS field Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] KVM: x86: Expose Architectural LBR CPUID leaf Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBRs Like Xu
2021-03-14 15:52 ` [PATCH v2] x86: Update guest LBR tests for Architectural LBR Like Xu
2021-03-22  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Guest Architectural LBR Enabling Xu, Like
2021-04-06  3:19 ` Xu, Like
2021-04-21  2:25   ` Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210314155225.206661-3-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).