From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/6] vfio: defer to commit kvm irq routing when enable msi/msix
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 16:16:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211103081657.1945-7-longpeng2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211103081657.1945-1-longpeng2@huawei.com>
In migration resume phase, all unmasked msix vectors need to be
setup when loading the VF state. However, the setup operation would
take longer if the VM has more VFs and each VF has more unmasked
vectors.
The hot spot is kvm_irqchip_commit_routes, it'll scan and update
all irqfds that are already assigned each invocation, so more
vectors means need more time to process them.
vfio_pci_load_config
vfio_msix_enable
msix_set_vector_notifiers
for (vector = 0; vector < dev->msix_entries_nr; vector++) {
vfio_msix_vector_do_use
vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq
kvm_irqchip_commit_routes <-- expensive
}
We can reduce the cost by only committing once outside the loop.
The routes are cached in kvm_state, we commit them first and then
bind irqfd for each vector.
The test VM has 128 vcpus and 8 VF (each one has 65 vectors),
we measure the cost of the vfio_msix_enable for each VF, and
we can see 90+% costs can be reduce.
VF Count of irqfds[*] Original With this patch
1st 65 8 2
2nd 130 15 2
3rd 195 22 2
4th 260 24 3
5th 325 36 2
6th 390 44 3
7th 455 51 3
8th 520 58 4
Total 258ms 21ms
[*] Count of irqfds
How many irqfds that already assigned and need to process in this
round.
The optimization can be applied to msi type too.
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
---
hw/vfio/pci.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
hw/vfio/pci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 69ad081..5b3a86d 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -413,30 +413,37 @@ static int vfio_enable_vectors(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, bool msix)
static void vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, VFIOMSIVector *vector,
int vector_n, bool msix)
{
- int virq;
-
if ((msix && vdev->no_kvm_msix) || (!msix && vdev->no_kvm_msi)) {
return;
}
- if (event_notifier_init(&vector->kvm_interrupt, 0)) {
+ vector->virq = kvm_irqchip_add_deferred_msi_route(kvm_state, vector_n,
+ &vdev->pdev);
+}
+
+static void vfio_connect_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOMSIVector *vector)
+{
+ if (vector->virq < 0) {
return;
}
- virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, vector_n, &vdev->pdev);
- if (virq < 0) {
- event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
- return;
+ if (event_notifier_init(&vector->kvm_interrupt, 0)) {
+ goto fail_notifier;
}
if (kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(kvm_state, &vector->kvm_interrupt,
- NULL, virq) < 0) {
- kvm_irqchip_release_virq(kvm_state, virq);
- event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
- return;
+ NULL, vector->virq) < 0) {
+ goto fail_kvm;
}
- vector->virq = virq;
+ return;
+
+fail_kvm:
+ event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
+fail_notifier:
+ kvm_irqchip_release_virq(kvm_state, vector->virq);
+ vector->virq = -1;
+ return;
}
static void vfio_remove_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOMSIVector *vector)
@@ -492,6 +499,10 @@ static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
} else {
if (msg) {
vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(vdev, vector, nr, true);
+ if (!vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing) {
+ kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
+ vfio_connect_kvm_msi_virq(vector);
+ }
}
}
@@ -501,11 +512,13 @@ static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
* increase them as needed.
*/
if (vdev->nr_vectors < nr + 1) {
- vfio_disable_irqindex(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX);
vdev->nr_vectors = nr + 1;
- ret = vfio_enable_vectors(vdev, true);
- if (ret) {
- error_report("vfio: failed to enable vectors, %d", ret);
+ if (!vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing) {
+ vfio_disable_irqindex(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX);
+ ret = vfio_enable_vectors(vdev, true);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("vfio: failed to enable vectors, %d", ret);
+ }
}
} else {
Error *err = NULL;
@@ -567,6 +580,30 @@ static void vfio_msix_vector_release(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr)
}
}
+static void vfio_prepare_kvm_msi_virq_batch(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
+{
+ assert(!vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing);
+ vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing = true;
+}
+
+static void vfio_commit_kvm_msi_virq_batch(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ assert(vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing);
+ vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing = false;
+
+ if (!vdev->nr_vectors) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < vdev->nr_vectors; i++) {
+ vfio_connect_kvm_msi_virq(&vdev->msi_vectors[i]);
+ }
+}
+
static void vfio_msix_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
{
vfio_disable_interrupts(vdev);
@@ -576,26 +613,45 @@ static void vfio_msix_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
vdev->interrupt = VFIO_INT_MSIX;
/*
- * Some communication channels between VF & PF or PF & fw rely on the
- * physical state of the device and expect that enabling MSI-X from the
- * guest enables the same on the host. When our guest is Linux, the
- * guest driver call to pci_enable_msix() sets the enabling bit in the
- * MSI-X capability, but leaves the vector table masked. We therefore
- * can't rely on a vector_use callback (from request_irq() in the guest)
- * to switch the physical device into MSI-X mode because that may come a
- * long time after pci_enable_msix(). This code enables vector 0 with
- * triggering to userspace, then immediately release the vector, leaving
- * the physical device with no vectors enabled, but MSI-X enabled, just
- * like the guest view.
+ * Setting vector notifiers triggers synchronous vector-use
+ * callbacks for each active vector. Deferring to commit the KVM
+ * routes once rather than per vector provides a substantial
+ * performance improvement.
*/
- vfio_msix_vector_do_use(&vdev->pdev, 0, NULL, NULL);
- vfio_msix_vector_release(&vdev->pdev, 0);
+ vfio_prepare_kvm_msi_virq_batch(vdev);
if (msix_set_vector_notifiers(&vdev->pdev, vfio_msix_vector_use,
vfio_msix_vector_release, NULL)) {
error_report("vfio: msix_set_vector_notifiers failed");
}
+ vfio_commit_kvm_msi_virq_batch(vdev);
+
+ if (vdev->nr_vectors) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vfio_enable_vectors(vdev, true);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("vfio: failed to enable vectors, %d", ret);
+ }
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Some communication channels between VF & PF or PF & fw rely on the
+ * physical state of the device and expect that enabling MSI-X from the
+ * guest enables the same on the host. When our guest is Linux, the
+ * guest driver call to pci_enable_msix() sets the enabling bit in the
+ * MSI-X capability, but leaves the vector table masked. We therefore
+ * can't rely on a vector_use callback (from request_irq() in the guest)
+ * to switch the physical device into MSI-X mode because that may come a
+ * long time after pci_enable_msix(). This code enables vector 0 with
+ * triggering to userspace, then immediately release the vector, leaving
+ * the physical device with no vectors enabled, but MSI-X enabled, just
+ * like the guest view.
+ */
+ vfio_msix_vector_do_use(&vdev->pdev, 0, NULL, NULL);
+ vfio_msix_vector_release(&vdev->pdev, 0);
+ }
+
trace_vfio_msix_enable(vdev->vbasedev.name);
}
@@ -605,6 +661,13 @@ static void vfio_msi_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
vfio_disable_interrupts(vdev);
+ /*
+ * Setting vector notifiers needs to enable route for each vector.
+ * Deferring to commit the KVM routes once rather than per vector
+ * provides a substantial performance improvement.
+ */
+ vfio_prepare_kvm_msi_virq_batch(vdev);
+
vdev->nr_vectors = msi_nr_vectors_allocated(&vdev->pdev);
retry:
vdev->msi_vectors = g_new0(VFIOMSIVector, vdev->nr_vectors);
@@ -630,6 +693,8 @@ retry:
vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(vdev, vector, i, false);
}
+ vfio_commit_kvm_msi_virq_batch(vdev);
+
/* Set interrupt type prior to possible interrupts */
vdev->interrupt = VFIO_INT_MSI;
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.h b/hw/vfio/pci.h
index 6477751..d3c5177 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.h
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.h
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ struct VFIOPCIDevice {
bool no_kvm_ioeventfd;
bool no_vfio_ioeventfd;
bool enable_ramfb;
+ bool defer_kvm_irq_routing;
VFIODisplay *dpy;
Notifier irqchip_change_notifier;
};
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 8:16 [PATCH v5 0/6] optimize the downtime for vfio migration Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] vfio: simplify the conditional statements in vfio_msi_enable Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] vfio: move re-enabling INTX out of the common helper Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] vfio: simplify the failure path in vfio_msi_enable Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] kvm: irqchip: extract kvm_irqchip_add_deferred_msi_route Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-12 3:59 ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2021-11-12 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-13 9:21 ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] Revert "vfio: Avoid disabling and enabling vectors repeatedly in VFIO migration" Longpeng(Mike)
2021-11-03 8:16 ` Longpeng(Mike) [this message]
2021-11-03 20:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] optimize the downtime for vfio migration Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211103081657.1945-7-longpeng2@huawei.com \
--to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).