From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 16/29] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211117064359.2362060-17-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com>
Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 +
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 72db73c79403..9dc9970a2d46 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -746,6 +746,8 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags);
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
/* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 2f03cbfefe67..19c4a78f931d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -588,6 +588,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
return -EPERM;
+ if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm) && kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(vcpu))
+ return -EPERM;
+
vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 35e458cc1e1d..b848ecea0c59 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -841,9 +841,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
- .ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
- U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) |
- U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE),
.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
.get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3460,10 +3457,106 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
return write_demux_regids(uindices);
}
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+ u32 id;
+ u32 shift;
+ u32 frac_id;
+ u32 frac_shift;
+ u8 frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function only checks fractional feature field and assumes
+ * the feature field is valid.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+ u32 id;
+ int fval, flim, ret;
+ u64 val, lim, mask;
+ const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ bool sign = FCT_SIGN(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+ enum feature_check_type type = FCT_TYPE(ftr_frac->frac_ftr_check);
+
+ /* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+ id = ftr_frac->id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id);
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+
+ mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+ if ((val & mask) != (lim & mask))
+ /*
+ * The feature level is smaller than the limit.
+ * Any fractional version should be fine.
+ */
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check the fractional feature field */
+ id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id);
+ fval = cpuid_feature_extract_field(val, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+ flim = cpuid_feature_extract_field(lim, ftr_frac->frac_shift, sign);
+
+ ret = arm64_check_feature_one(type, fval, flim);
+ return ret ? -E2BIG : 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i, err;
+ const struct feature_frac *frac;
+
+ /*
+ * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+ * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
{
int i;
struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ struct feature_frac *frac;
+ u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
+ u64 org;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3472,6 +3565,32 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+
+ /*
+ * An ID register that has fractional fields is expected
+ * to have its own id_reg_info.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Update the id_reg's ftr_check_types for the fractional
+ * field with FCT_IGNORE so that the field won't be validated
+ * when the ID register is set by userspace, which could
+ * temporarily cause an inconsistency if its (main) feature
+ * field is not set yet. Save the original ftr_check_types
+ * for the fractional field to validate the field later.
+ */
+ org = (id_reg->ftr_check_types >> frac->frac_shift) & mask;
+ id_reg->ftr_check_types &= ~(mask << frac->frac_shift);
+ id_reg->ftr_check_types |=
+ MAKE_FCT(frac->frac_shift, FCT_IGNORE, FCT_SIGN(org));
+ frac->frac_ftr_check = org;
+ }
}
void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-17 6:43 [RFC PATCH v3 00/29] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/29] KVM: arm64: Add has_reset_once flag for vcpu Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 0:51 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/29] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per vCPU Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:36 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-18 22:00 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 18:08 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-21 12:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 4:39 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 10:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 17:12 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 10:58 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 1:45 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07 9:34 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08 5:57 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08 7:09 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-08 7:18 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:36 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-19 4:47 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 0:56 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 18:22 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 6:05 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-25 5:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-01 15:38 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02 4:32 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 21:07 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 6:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 12:51 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-01 15:24 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02 4:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 12:51 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 4:35 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07 9:36 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 12:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-24 6:11 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 15:35 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30 1:29 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 13:02 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 7:59 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07 9:42 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 15:31 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30 4:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 16:06 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/29] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30 5:32 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-01 15:53 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-01 16:09 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-02 4:42 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 10:57 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 1:04 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 14:14 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-04 17:39 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-04 23:38 ` Itaru Kitayama
2021-12-06 0:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-06 9:52 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06 10:25 ` Eric Auger
2021-12-07 7:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-07 8:10 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30 5:21 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 13:46 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-25 5:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-25 20:30 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-30 5:39 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-02 13:11 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/29] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/29] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/29] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/29] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 21/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-21 18:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-23 7:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 22/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 23/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 24/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 25/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 26/29] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 27/29] KVM: arm64: Initialize trapping of disabled CPU features for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 28/29] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-17 6:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 29/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-18 20:34 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-20 6:39 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-22 14:17 ` Eric Auger
2021-11-23 6:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/29] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 5:13 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 10:50 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 17:00 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-23 16:27 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 5:49 ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-11-24 10:48 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-11-24 16:44 ` Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211117064359.2362060-17-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).