* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status
@ 2022-04-01 12:33 Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-04-01 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, thuth, david, farman
Changelog from v1:
----
- Move vector related defines to own header
- Write restart_write_vector in assembler to avoid undesired use of floating
point registers by the compiler.
- Minor naming fixes
As suggested by Claudio, move the store adtl status I sent previously
("[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception
tests") into its own file.
Nico Boehr (2):
s390x: gs: move to new header file
s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
lib/s390x/asm/vector.h | 16 ++
lib/s390x/gs.h | 69 +++++++
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/adtl-status.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/gs.c | 54 +-----
s390x/unittests.cfg | 25 +++
6 files changed, 523 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/gs.h
create mode 100644 s390x/adtl-status.c
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file
2022-04-01 12:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-01 12:33 ` Nico Boehr
2022-04-12 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
2022-04-12 15:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Claudio Imbrenda
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-04-01 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, thuth, david, farman
Move the guarded-storage related structs and instructions to a new
header file because we will also need them for the SIGP store additional
status tests.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/gs.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/gs.c | 54 +--------------------------------------
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/gs.h
diff --git a/lib/s390x/gs.h b/lib/s390x/gs.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c94e580b4b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/s390x/gs.h
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Guarded storage related definitions
+ *
+ * Copyright 2018 IBM Corp.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
+ * Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+#ifndef _S390X_GS_H_
+#define _S390X_GS_H_
+
+struct gs_cb {
+ uint64_t reserved;
+ uint64_t gsd;
+ uint64_t gssm;
+ uint64_t gs_epl_a;
+};
+
+struct gs_epl {
+ uint8_t pad1;
+ union {
+ uint8_t gs_eam;
+ struct {
+ uint8_t : 6;
+ uint8_t e : 1;
+ uint8_t b : 1;
+ };
+ };
+ union {
+ uint8_t gs_eci;
+ struct {
+ uint8_t tx : 1;
+ uint8_t cx : 1;
+ uint8_t : 5;
+ uint8_t in : 1;
+ };
+ };
+ union {
+ uint8_t gs_eai;
+ struct {
+ uint8_t : 1;
+ uint8_t t : 1;
+ uint8_t as : 2;
+ uint8_t ar : 4;
+ };
+ };
+ uint32_t pad2;
+ uint64_t gs_eha;
+ uint64_t gs_eia;
+ uint64_t gs_eoa;
+ uint64_t gs_eir;
+ uint64_t gs_era;
+};
+
+static inline void load_gs_cb(struct gs_cb *gs_cb)
+{
+ asm volatile(".insn rxy,0xe3000000004d,0,%0" : : "Q" (*gs_cb));
+}
+
+static inline void store_gs_cb(struct gs_cb *gs_cb)
+{
+ asm volatile(".insn rxy,0xe30000000049,0,%0" : : "Q" (*gs_cb));
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/s390x/gs.c b/s390x/gs.c
index 7567bb78fecb..4993eb8f43a9 100644
--- a/s390x/gs.c
+++ b/s390x/gs.c
@@ -13,49 +13,7 @@
#include <asm/facility.h>
#include <asm/interrupt.h>
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
-
-struct gs_cb {
- uint64_t reserved;
- uint64_t gsd;
- uint64_t gssm;
- uint64_t gs_epl_a;
-};
-
-struct gs_epl {
- uint8_t pad1;
- union {
- uint8_t gs_eam;
- struct {
- uint8_t : 6;
- uint8_t e : 1;
- uint8_t b : 1;
- };
- };
- union {
- uint8_t gs_eci;
- struct {
- uint8_t tx : 1;
- uint8_t cx : 1;
- uint8_t : 5;
- uint8_t in : 1;
- };
- };
- union {
- uint8_t gs_eai;
- struct {
- uint8_t : 1;
- uint8_t t : 1;
- uint8_t as : 2;
- uint8_t ar : 4;
- };
- };
- uint32_t pad2;
- uint64_t gs_eha;
- uint64_t gs_eia;
- uint64_t gs_eoa;
- uint64_t gs_eir;
- uint64_t gs_era;
-};
+#include <gs.h>
static volatile int guarded = 0;
static struct gs_cb gs_cb;
@@ -64,16 +22,6 @@ static unsigned long gs_area = 0x2000000;
void gs_handler(struct gs_cb *this_cb);
-static inline void load_gs_cb(struct gs_cb *gs_cb)
-{
- asm volatile(".insn rxy,0xe3000000004d,0,%0" : : "Q" (*gs_cb));
-}
-
-static inline void store_gs_cb(struct gs_cb *gs_cb)
-{
- asm volatile(".insn rxy,0xe30000000049,0,%0" : : "Q" (*gs_cb));
-}
-
static inline unsigned long load_guarded(unsigned long *p)
{
unsigned long v;
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
2022-04-01 12:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-01 12:33 ` Nico Boehr
2022-04-06 13:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-12 15:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Claudio Imbrenda
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-04-01 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, thuth, david, farman
Add a test for SIGP STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS order.
There are several cases to cover:
- when neither vector nor guarded-storage facility is available, check
the order is rejected.
- when one of the facilities is there, test the order is rejected and
adtl_status is not touched when the target CPU is running or when an
invalid CPU address is specified. Also check the order is rejected
in case of invalid alignment.
- when the vector facility is there, write some data to the CPU's
vector registers and check we get the right contents.
- when the guarded-storage facility is there, populate the CPU's
guarded-storage registers with some data and again check we get the
right contents.
To make sure we cover all these cases, adjust unittests.cfg to run the
test with both guarded-storage and vector facility off and on. In TCG, we don't
have guarded-storage support, so we just run with vector facility off and on.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/vector.h | 16 ++
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/adtl-status.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 25 +++
4 files changed, 453 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
create mode 100644 s390x/adtl-status.c
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ee48bfa65070
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Vector facility related defines and functions
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#ifndef _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
+#define _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
+
+#define VEC_REGISTER_NUM 32
+#define VEC_REGISTER_SIZE 16
+
+#endif
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 53b0fe044fe7..867d261622b6 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
diff --git a/s390x/adtl-status.c b/s390x/adtl-status.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c3ecdbc35a9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/adtl-status.c
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Tests sigp store additional status order
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/sigp.h>
+#include <asm/vector.h>
+
+#include <smp.h>
+#include <gs.h>
+
+static int testflag = 0;
+
+#define INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS -4711
+
+struct mcesa_lc12 {
+ uint8_t vregs[0x200]; /* 0x000 */
+ uint8_t reserved200[0x400 - 0x200]; /* 0x200 */
+ struct gs_cb gs_cb; /* 0x400 */
+ uint8_t reserved420[0x800 - 0x420]; /* 0x420 */
+ uint8_t reserved800[0x1000 - 0x800]; /* 0x800 */
+};
+
+static struct mcesa_lc12 adtl_status __attribute__((aligned(4096)));
+
+static uint8_t expected_vec_contents[VEC_REGISTER_NUM][VEC_REGISTER_SIZE];
+
+static struct gs_cb gs_cb;
+static struct gs_epl gs_epl;
+
+static bool memisset(void *s, int c, size_t n)
+{
+ uint8_t *p = s;
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ if (p[i] != c) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void wait_for_flag(void)
+{
+ while (!testflag)
+ mb();
+}
+
+static void set_flag(int val)
+{
+ mb();
+ testflag = val;
+ mb();
+}
+
+static void test_func(void)
+{
+ set_flag(1);
+}
+
+static bool have_adtl_status(void)
+{
+ return test_facility(133) || test_facility(129);
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status(void)
+{
+ uint32_t status = -1;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status");
+
+ if (!have_adtl_status()) {
+ report_skip("no guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ report_prefix_push("running");
+ smp_cpu_restart(1);
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE, "status = INCORRECT_STATE");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("invalid CPU address");
+
+ cc = sigp(INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+ report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("unaligned");
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status + 256, &status);
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, "status = INVALID_PARAMETER");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_unavail(void)
+{
+ uint32_t status = 0;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status unavailable");
+
+ if (have_adtl_status()) {
+ report_skip("guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ report_prefix_push("not accepted");
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_ORDER,
+ "status = INVALID_ORDER");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void restart_write_vector(void)
+{
+ uint8_t *vec_reg;
+ /* vlm handles at most 16 registers at a time */
+ uint8_t *vec_reg_16_31 = &expected_vec_contents[16][0];
+ uint64_t cr0, cr0_mask = ~(1ULL << CTL0_VECTOR);
+ int one = 1;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VEC_REGISTER_NUM; i++) {
+ vec_reg = &expected_vec_contents[i][0];
+ /* i+1 to avoid zero content */
+ memset(vec_reg, i + 1, VEC_REGISTER_SIZE);
+ }
+
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_VECTOR);
+
+ asm volatile (
+ " .machine z13\n"
+ /* load vector registers */
+ " vlm 0,15, %[vec_reg_0_15]\n"
+ " vlm 16,31, %[vec_reg_16_31]\n"
+ /* turn off vector instructions */
+ " stctg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
+ " ng %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
+ " stg %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
+ " lctlg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
+ /* inform CPU 0 we are done by setting testflag to 1 */
+ " st %[one], %[testflag]\n"
+ /*
+ * infinite loop. function epilogue will restore floating point
+ * registers and hence destroy vector register contents
+ */
+ "0: j 0\n"
+ : [cr0_mask] "+&d"(cr0_mask)
+ : [vec_reg_0_15] "Q"(expected_vec_contents),
+ [vec_reg_16_31] "Q"(*vec_reg_16_31),
+ [cr0] "Q"(cr0),
+ [testflag] "T"(testflag),
+ [one] "d"(one)
+ : "v0", "v1", "v2", "v3", "v4", "v5", "v6", "v7", "v8", "v9",
+ "v10", "v11", "v12", "v13", "v14", "v15", "v16", "v17", "v18",
+ "v19", "v20", "v21", "v22", "v23", "v24", "v25", "v26", "v27",
+ "v28", "v29", "v30", "v31", "cc", "memory"
+ );
+}
+
+static void cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
+{
+ struct psw new_psw;
+
+ smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
+
+ new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_vector;
+
+ set_flag(0);
+
+ smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
+
+ wait_for_flag();
+}
+
+static int adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ assert (!lc || (lc >= 10 && lc <= 12));
+
+ if (lc <= 10 && !memisset(&adtl_status.gs_cb, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.gs_cb)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved200, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved200)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved420, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved420)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved800, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved800)))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ uint32_t status = -1;
+ struct psw psw;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
+
+ if (!test_facility(133) && lc) {
+ report_skip("not supported, no guarded-storage facility");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(1);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+
+ report(!memcmp(adtl_status.vregs,
+ expected_vec_contents, sizeof(expected_vec_contents)),
+ "additional status contents match");
+
+ report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
+ "no write outside expected fields");
+
+ /*
+ * To avoid the floating point/vector registers being cleaned up, we
+ * stopped CPU1 right in the middle of a function. Hence the cleanup of
+ * the function didn't run yet and the stackpointer is messed up.
+ * Destroy and re-initalize the CPU to fix that.
+ */
+ smp_cpu_destroy(1);
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
+ smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_vector(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status vector");
+
+ if (!test_facility(129)) {
+ report_skip("vector facility not installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(0);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(10);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(11);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(12);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void restart_write_gs_regs(void)
+{
+ const unsigned long gs_area = 0x2000000;
+ const unsigned long gsc = 25; /* align = 32 M, section size = 512K */
+
+ ctl_set_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
+
+ gs_cb.gsd = gs_area | gsc;
+ gs_cb.gssm = 0xfeedc0ffe;
+ gs_cb.gs_epl_a = (uint64_t) &gs_epl;
+
+ load_gs_cb(&gs_cb);
+
+ set_flag(1);
+
+ ctl_clear_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
+
+ /*
+ * Safe to return here. r14 will point to the endless loop in
+ * smp_cpu_setup_state.
+ */
+}
+
+static void cpu_write_to_gs_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
+{
+ struct psw new_psw;
+
+ smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
+
+ new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_gs_regs;
+
+ set_flag(0);
+
+ smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
+
+ wait_for_flag();
+}
+
+static void __store_adtl_status_gs(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ uint32_t status = 0;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
+
+ cpu_write_to_gs_regs(1);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+
+ report(!memcmp(&adtl_status.gs_cb, &gs_cb, sizeof(gs_cb)),
+ "additional status contents match");
+
+ report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
+ "no write outside expected fields");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_gs(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status guarded-storage");
+
+ if (!test_facility(133)) {
+ report_skip("guarded-storage facility not installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ __store_adtl_status_gs(11);
+ __store_adtl_status_gs(12);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ struct psw psw;
+ report_prefix_push("adtl_status");
+
+ if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
+ report_skip("need at least 2 cpus for this test");
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
+ smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ test_store_adtl_status_unavail();
+ test_store_adtl_status_vector();
+ test_store_adtl_status_gs();
+ test_store_adtl_status();
+ smp_cpu_destroy(1);
+
+done:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 1600e714c8b9..2159ba679519 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -136,3 +136,28 @@ file = firq.elf
timeout = 20
extra_params = -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -cpu qemu -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=2 -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=1
accel = tcg
+
+[adtl-status-kvm]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = kvm
+extra_params = -cpu host,gs=on,vx=on
+
+[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-kvm]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = kvm
+extra_params = -cpu host,gs=off,vx=off
+
+[adtl-status-tcg]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = tcg
+# no guarded-storage support in tcg
+extra_params = -cpu qemu,vx=on
+
+[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-tcg]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = tcg
+extra_params = -cpu qemu,gs=off,vx=off
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-06 13:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-11 13:23 ` Nico Boehr
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2022-04-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, thuth, david, farman
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:33:21 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Add a test for SIGP STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS order.
>
> There are several cases to cover:
> - when neither vector nor guarded-storage facility is available, check
> the order is rejected.
> - when one of the facilities is there, test the order is rejected and
> adtl_status is not touched when the target CPU is running or when an
> invalid CPU address is specified. Also check the order is rejected
> in case of invalid alignment.
> - when the vector facility is there, write some data to the CPU's
> vector registers and check we get the right contents.
> - when the guarded-storage facility is there, populate the CPU's
> guarded-storage registers with some data and again check we get the
> right contents.
>
> To make sure we cover all these cases, adjust unittests.cfg to run the
> test with both guarded-storage and vector facility off and on. In TCG, we don't
> have guarded-storage support, so we just run with vector facility off and on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/vector.h | 16 ++
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/adtl-status.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 25 +++
> 4 files changed, 453 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
> create mode 100644 s390x/adtl-status.c
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ee48bfa65070
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Vector facility related defines and functions
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
> +#define _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
> +
> +#define VEC_REGISTER_NUM 32
> +#define VEC_REGISTER_SIZE 16
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 53b0fe044fe7..867d261622b6 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
>
> pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
>
> diff --git a/s390x/adtl-status.c b/s390x/adtl-status.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c3ecdbc35a9d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/adtl-status.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Tests sigp store additional status order
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/sigp.h>
> +#include <asm/vector.h>
> +
> +#include <smp.h>
> +#include <gs.h>
> +
> +static int testflag = 0;
> +
> +#define INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS -4711
> +
> +struct mcesa_lc12 {
> + uint8_t vregs[0x200]; /* 0x000 */
> + uint8_t reserved200[0x400 - 0x200]; /* 0x200 */
> + struct gs_cb gs_cb; /* 0x400 */
> + uint8_t reserved420[0x800 - 0x420]; /* 0x420 */
> + uint8_t reserved800[0x1000 - 0x800]; /* 0x800 */
> +};
> +
> +static struct mcesa_lc12 adtl_status __attribute__((aligned(4096)));
> +
> +static uint8_t expected_vec_contents[VEC_REGISTER_NUM][VEC_REGISTER_SIZE];
> +
> +static struct gs_cb gs_cb;
> +static struct gs_epl gs_epl;
> +
> +static bool memisset(void *s, int c, size_t n)
> +{
> + uint8_t *p = s;
> + size_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + if (p[i] != c) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
you don't need the braces here
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void wait_for_flag(void)
> +{
> + while (!testflag)
> + mb();
> +}
> +
> +static void set_flag(int val)
> +{
> + mb();
> + testflag = val;
> + mb();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_func(void)
> +{
> + set_flag(1);
> +}
> +
> +static bool have_adtl_status(void)
> +{
> + return test_facility(133) || test_facility(129);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_adtl_status(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t status = -1;
> + int cc;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("store additional status");
> +
> + if (!have_adtl_status()) {
> + report_skip("no guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
> +
> + report_prefix_push("running");
> + smp_cpu_restart(1);
> +
> + cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
> +
> + report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
> + report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE, "status = INCORRECT_STATE");
> + report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
> + "additional status not touched");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("invalid CPU address");
> +
> + cc = sigp(INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
> + report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
> + report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
> + "additional status not touched");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("unaligned");
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +
> + cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status + 256, &status);
> + report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
> + report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, "status = INVALID_PARAMETER");
> + report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
> + "additional status not touched");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +out:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_adtl_status_unavail(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t status = 0;
> + int cc;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("store additional status unavailable");
> +
> + if (have_adtl_status()) {
> + report_skip("guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + report_prefix_push("not accepted");
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +
> + memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
> +
> + cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
> +
> + report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
> + report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_ORDER,
> + "status = INVALID_ORDER");
> + report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
> + "additional status not touched");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +out:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void restart_write_vector(void)
> +{
> + uint8_t *vec_reg;
> + /* vlm handles at most 16 registers at a time */
> + uint8_t *vec_reg_16_31 = &expected_vec_contents[16][0];
> + uint64_t cr0, cr0_mask = ~(1ULL << CTL0_VECTOR);
cr0_mask can be const, and you can use ~BIT_ULL(CTL0_VECTOR)
> + int one = 1;
one can also be const, although I wonder if this can just become an
constant in the asm statement
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VEC_REGISTER_NUM; i++) {
> + vec_reg = &expected_vec_contents[i][0];
> + /* i+1 to avoid zero content */
> + memset(vec_reg, i + 1, VEC_REGISTER_SIZE);
> + }
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_VECTOR);
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + " .machine z13\n"
> + /* load vector registers */
> + " vlm 0,15, %[vec_reg_0_15]\n"
> + " vlm 16,31, %[vec_reg_16_31]\n"
> + /* turn off vector instructions */
> + " stctg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
> + " ng %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
> + " stg %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
> + " lctlg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
> + /* inform CPU 0 we are done by setting testflag to 1 */
> + " st %[one], %[testflag]\n"
> + /*
> + * infinite loop. function epilogue will restore floating point
> + * registers and hence destroy vector register contents
> + */
> + "0: j 0\n"
> + : [cr0_mask] "+&d"(cr0_mask)
> + : [vec_reg_0_15] "Q"(expected_vec_contents),
> + [vec_reg_16_31] "Q"(*vec_reg_16_31),
> + [cr0] "Q"(cr0),
> + [testflag] "T"(testflag),
> + [one] "d"(one)
> + : "v0", "v1", "v2", "v3", "v4", "v5", "v6", "v7", "v8", "v9",
> + "v10", "v11", "v12", "v13", "v14", "v15", "v16", "v17", "v18",
> + "v19", "v20", "v21", "v22", "v23", "v24", "v25", "v26", "v27",
> + "v28", "v29", "v30", "v31", "cc", "memory"
> + );
> +}
> +
> +static void cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
> +{
> + struct psw new_psw;
> +
> + smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
> +
> + new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_vector;
> +
> + set_flag(0);
> +
> + smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
> +
> + wait_for_flag();
> +}
> +
> +static int adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(unsigned long lc)
> +{
> + assert (!lc || (lc >= 10 && lc <= 12));
> +
> + if (lc <= 10 && !memisset(&adtl_status.gs_cb, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.gs_cb)))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved200, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved200)))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved420, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved420)))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved800, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved800)))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(unsigned long lc)
> +{
> + uint32_t status = -1;
> + struct psw psw;
> + int cc;
> +
> + report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
> +
> + if (!test_facility(133) && lc) {
> + report_skip("not supported, no guarded-storage facility");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(1);
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +
> + memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
> +
> + cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
> + report(!cc, "CC = 0");
> +
> + report(!memcmp(adtl_status.vregs,
> + expected_vec_contents, sizeof(expected_vec_contents)),
> + "additional status contents match");
> +
> + report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
> + "no write outside expected fields");
> +
> + /*
> + * To avoid the floating point/vector registers being cleaned up, we
> + * stopped CPU1 right in the middle of a function. Hence the cleanup of
> + * the function didn't run yet and the stackpointer is messed up.
> + * Destroy and re-initalize the CPU to fix that.
> + */
> + smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> +
> +out:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_adtl_status_vector(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("store additional status vector");
> +
> + if (!test_facility(129)) {
> + report_skip("vector facility not installed");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(0);
> + __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(10);
> + __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(11);
> + __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(12);
> +
> +out:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void restart_write_gs_regs(void)
> +{
> + const unsigned long gs_area = 0x2000000;
> + const unsigned long gsc = 25; /* align = 32 M, section size = 512K */
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
> +
> + gs_cb.gsd = gs_area | gsc;
> + gs_cb.gssm = 0xfeedc0ffe;
> + gs_cb.gs_epl_a = (uint64_t) &gs_epl;
> +
> + load_gs_cb(&gs_cb);
> +
> + set_flag(1);
> +
> + ctl_clear_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
> +
> + /*
> + * Safe to return here. r14 will point to the endless loop in
> + * smp_cpu_setup_state.
> + */
> +}
> +
> +static void cpu_write_to_gs_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
> +{
> + struct psw new_psw;
> +
> + smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
> +
> + new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_gs_regs;
> +
> + set_flag(0);
> +
> + smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
> +
> + wait_for_flag();
> +}
> +
> +static void __store_adtl_status_gs(unsigned long lc)
> +{
> + uint32_t status = 0;
> + int cc;
> +
> + report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
> +
> + cpu_write_to_gs_regs(1);
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +
> + memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
> +
> + cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
> + (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
> + report(!cc, "CC = 0");
> +
> + report(!memcmp(&adtl_status.gs_cb, &gs_cb, sizeof(gs_cb)),
> + "additional status contents match");
> +
> + report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
> + "no write outside expected fields");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_adtl_status_gs(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("store additional status guarded-storage");
> +
> + if (!test_facility(133)) {
> + report_skip("guarded-storage facility not installed");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + __store_adtl_status_gs(11);
> + __store_adtl_status_gs(12);
> +
> +out:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + struct psw psw;
> + report_prefix_push("adtl_status");
> +
> + if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
> + report_skip("need at least 2 cpus for this test");
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
> + psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
> + smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
> +
> + test_store_adtl_status_unavail();
> + test_store_adtl_status_vector();
> + test_store_adtl_status_gs();
> + test_store_adtl_status();
> + smp_cpu_destroy(1);
> +
> +done:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> index 1600e714c8b9..2159ba679519 100644
> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> @@ -136,3 +136,28 @@ file = firq.elf
> timeout = 20
> extra_params = -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -cpu qemu -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=2 -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=1
> accel = tcg
> +
> +[adtl-status-kvm]
> +file = adtl-status.elf
> +smp = 2
> +accel = kvm
> +extra_params = -cpu host,gs=on,vx=on
> +
> +[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-kvm]
> +file = adtl-status.elf
> +smp = 2
> +accel = kvm
> +extra_params = -cpu host,gs=off,vx=off
> +
> +[adtl-status-tcg]
> +file = adtl-status.elf
> +smp = 2
> +accel = tcg
> +# no guarded-storage support in tcg
> +extra_params = -cpu qemu,vx=on
> +
> +[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-tcg]
> +file = adtl-status.elf
> +smp = 2
> +accel = tcg
> +extra_params = -cpu qemu,gs=off,vx=off
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
2022-04-06 13:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda
@ 2022-04-11 13:23 ` Nico Boehr
2022-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2022-04-11 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudio Imbrenda; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, thuth, david, farman
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 15:31 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > diff --git a/s390x/adtl-status.c b/s390x/adtl-status.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c3ecdbc35a9d
> >
[...]
> > +static void restart_write_vector(void)
> > +{
> > + uint8_t *vec_reg;
> > + /* vlm handles at most 16 registers at a time */
> > + uint8_t *vec_reg_16_31 = &expected_vec_contents[16][0];
> > + uint64_t cr0, cr0_mask = ~(1ULL << CTL0_VECTOR);
>
> cr0_mask can be const, and you can use ~BIT_ULL(CTL0_VECTOR)
I don't think so, since ng in the inline ASM will store its result
there.
BIT_ULL is much better, thanks. I tend to forget about that.
>
> > + int one = 1;
>
> one can also be const, although I wonder if this can just become an
> constant in the asm statement
Yes, right, thanks. Should work with mvhi.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
2022-04-11 13:23 ` Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2022-04-11 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, thuth, david, farman
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:23:17 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 15:31 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > > diff --git a/s390x/adtl-status.c b/s390x/adtl-status.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..c3ecdbc35a9d
> > >
> [...]
> > > +static void restart_write_vector(void)
> > > +{
> > > + uint8_t *vec_reg;
> > > + /* vlm handles at most 16 registers at a time */
> > > + uint8_t *vec_reg_16_31 = &expected_vec_contents[16][0];
> > > + uint64_t cr0, cr0_mask = ~(1ULL << CTL0_VECTOR);
> >
> > cr0_mask can be const, and you can use ~BIT_ULL(CTL0_VECTOR)
>
> I don't think so, since ng in the inline ASM will store its result
> there.
oops, right
>
> BIT_ULL is much better, thanks. I tend to forget about that.
>
> >
> > > + int one = 1;
> >
> > one can also be const, although I wonder if this can just become an
> > constant in the asm statement
>
> Yes, right, thanks. Should work with mvhi.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-12 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-04-12 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr, kvm, linux-s390; +Cc: frankja, imbrenda, david, farman
On 01/04/2022 14.33, Nico Boehr wrote:
> Move the guarded-storage related structs and instructions to a new
> header file because we will also need them for the SIGP store additional
> status tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/gs.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/gs.c | 54 +--------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/gs.h
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status
2022-04-01 12:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
@ 2022-04-12 15:20 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2022-04-12 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, frankja, thuth, david, farman
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:33:19 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Changelog from v1:
> ----
> - Move vector related defines to own header
> - Write restart_write_vector in assembler to avoid undesired use of floating
> point registers by the compiler.
> - Minor naming fixes
>
queued, thanks
> As suggested by Claudio, move the store adtl status I sent previously
> ("[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception
> tests") into its own file.
>
> Nico Boehr (2):
> s390x: gs: move to new header file
> s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
>
> lib/s390x/asm/vector.h | 16 ++
> lib/s390x/gs.h | 69 +++++++
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/adtl-status.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/gs.c | 54 +-----
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 25 +++
> 6 files changed, 523 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/gs.h
> create mode 100644 s390x/adtl-status.c
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-12 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-01 12:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
2022-04-12 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
2022-04-06 13:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-11 13:23 ` Nico Boehr
2022-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-12 15:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Claudio Imbrenda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).