Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: Handle the case of 5-level shadow page table

[Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>]

On 8/9/21 10:17 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021, Wei Huang wrote:
>> @@ -3457,10 +3457,19 @@ static int mmu_alloc_shadow_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  		mmu->pae_root[i] = root | pm_mask;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (mmu->shadow_root_level == PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Depending on the shadow_root_level, build the root_hpa table by
>> +	 * chaining either pml5->pml4->pae or pml4->pae.
>> +	 */
>> +	mmu->root_hpa = __pa(mmu->pae_root);
>> +	if (mmu->shadow_root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
>> +		mmu->pml4_root[0] = mmu->root_hpa | pm_mask;
>>  		mmu->root_hpa = __pa(mmu->pml4_root);
>> -	else
>> -		mmu->root_hpa = __pa(mmu->pae_root);
>> +	}
>> +	if (mmu->shadow_root_level == PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL) {
>> +		mmu->pml5_root[0] = mmu->root_hpa | pm_mask;
>> +		mmu->root_hpa = __pa(mmu->pml5_root);
>> +	}
> 
> I still really dislike this approach, it requires visually connecting multiple
> statements to understand the chain.  I don't see any advantage (the 6-level paging
> comment was 99.9% a joke) of rewriting root_hpa other than that's how it's done today.
> 

I can change this part in v3, unless different comments from other
reviewers.

> In the future, please give reviewers ample opportunity to respond before sending
> a new version if there's disagreement, otherwise the conversation gets carried
> over into a different thread and loses the original context.
> 
>>  
>>  set_root_pgd:
>>  	mmu->root_pgd = root_pgd;