From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
pbonzini@redhat.com, rananta@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
bgardon@google.com, reijiw@google.com, axelrasmussen@google.com,
oupton@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] KVM: selftests: Add aarch64/page_fault_test
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a66vl2tv.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yyia9uqpaIm4JyH+@google.com>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:38:14 +0100,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:09:17 +0000, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > > This series adds a new aarch64 selftest for testing stage 2 fault handling for
> > > various combinations of guest accesses (e.g., write, S1PTW), backing sources
> > > (e.g., anon), and types of faults (e.g., read on hugetlbfs with a hole, write
> > > on a readonly memslot). Each test tries a different combination and then checks
> > > that the access results in the right behavior (e.g., uffd faults with the right
> > > address and write/read flag). Some interesting combinations are:
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Given how long this has been around, I've picked this series up, applying
> > Oliver's fixes in the process.
>
> Any chance this can be undone? A big reason why this is at v6 is
> because of the common API changes, and due to KVM Forum I've
> effectively had three working days since this was posted, and others
> have probably had even less, i.e. lack of reviews on v6 isn't
> because no one cares.
Hey, I'm still not back at work, and won't be for another week! But
fair enough, if there is going to be a respin, I'd rather see that
(and I'm less hung up on tests having been in -next for some time
before sending out a PR that eventually reaches Linus).
> It's not the end of the world if we have to fix things up on top,
> but we'd avoid a decent amount of churn if we can instead unwind and
> do a v7.
No skin off my nose, as this leaves on its own topic branch. Now
dropped.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 18:09 [PATCH v6 00/13] KVM: selftests: Add aarch64/page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] KVM: selftests: Add a userfaultfd library Ricardo Koller
2022-09-17 22:14 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add virt_get_pte_hva() library function Ricardo Koller
2022-09-17 22:15 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] KVM: selftests: Add missing close and munmap in __vm_mem_region_delete() Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Construct DEFAULT_MAIR_EL1 using sysreg.h macros Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] tools: Copy bitfield.h from the kernel sources Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] KVM: selftests: Stash backing_src_type in struct userspace_mem_region Ricardo Koller
2022-09-17 22:17 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] KVM: selftests: Change ____vm_create() to take struct kvm_vm_mem_params Ricardo Koller
2022-09-19 6:42 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-19 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 19:21 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] KVM: selftests: Use the right memslot for code, page-tables, and data allocations Ricardo Koller
2022-09-19 6:42 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add aarch64/page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-09-17 21:58 ` Oliver Upton
2022-09-19 19:29 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-19 20:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add dirty logging " Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add readonly memslot " Ricardo Koller
2022-09-06 18:09 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add mix of " Ricardo Koller
2022-09-19 10:38 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] KVM: selftests: Add aarch64/page_fault_test Marc Zyngier
2022-09-19 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-19 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-09-19 18:28 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-09-20 4:14 Ricardo Koller
2022-09-20 4:18 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a66vl2tv.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).