Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/9] s390x: smp: Test all CRs on initial reset

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 20.01.20 15:49, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 1/20/20 1:10 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 17.01.20 11:46, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> All CRs are set to 0 and CRs 0 and 14 are set to pre-defined values,
>>> so we also need to test 1-13 and 15 for 0.
>>>
>>> And while we're at it, let's also set some values to cr 1, 7 and 13, so
>>> we can actually be sure that they will be zeroed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  s390x/smp.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
>>> index c12a3db..1385488 100644
>>> --- a/s390x/smp.c
>>> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
>>> @@ -169,16 +169,30 @@ static void test_emcall(void)
>>>  	report_prefix_pop();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +/* Used to dirty registers of cpu #1 before it is reset */
>>> +static void test_func_initial(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	lctlg(1, 0x42000UL);
>>> +	lctlg(7, 0x43000UL);
>>> +	lctlg(13, 0x44000UL);
>>> +	mb();
>>> +	testflag = 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void test_reset_initial(void)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(0);
>>> +	uint64_t nullp[12] = {};
>>>  	struct psw psw;
>>>  
>>>  	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
>>> -	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
>>> +	psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func_initial;
>>>  
>>>  	report_prefix_push("reset initial");
>>> +	testflag = 0;
>>> +	mb();
>>
>> maybe use a  set_flag() function like
>>
>> mb();
>> testflag = val;
>> mb();
>>
>> and use it everywhere you set the flag? (e.g., in test_func_initial())
> 
> Hmm, so basically a set_test_flag() function in a new patch :)
> Ok, I'll have a look.

Sorry that this patch set keeps exploding :)


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb