From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Stamatis, Ilias" <ilstam@amazon.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"ilstam@mailbox.org" <ilstam@mailbox.org>
Cc: "jmattson@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"haozhong.zhang@intel.com" <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"zamsden@gmail.com" <zamsden@gmail.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com" <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>,
"wanpengli@tencent.com" <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: VMX: Adjust the TSC-related VMCS fields on L2 entry and exit
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 16:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9506c826-face-e816-d88a-3797872f26d2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ebf2b17f339bf21b69bba41575e62f98ec87105.camel@amazon.com>
On 06/05/21 19:35, Stamatis, Ilias wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-05-06 at 13:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/05/21 12:32, ilstam@mailbox.org wrote:
>>> + if (vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control &
>>> CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING) {
>>> + if (vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control &
>>> SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING) {
>>> + vcpu->arch.tsc_offset =
>>> kvm_compute_02_tsc_offset(
>>> + vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset,
>>> + vmcs12->tsc_multiplier,
>>> + vmcs12->tsc_offset);
>>> +
>>> + vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio =
>>> mul_u64_u64_shr(
>>> + vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio,
>>> + vmcs12->tsc_multiplier,
>>> + kvm_tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bit
>>> s);
>>> + } else {
>>> + vcpu->arch.tsc_offset += vmcs12->tsc_offset;
>>> + }
>>
>> The computation of vcpu->arch.tsc_offset is (not coincidentially) the
>> same that appears in patch 6
>>
>> + (vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control &
>> CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING)) {
>> + if (vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control &
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING) {
>> + cur_offset = kvm_compute_02_tsc_offset(
>> + l1_offset,
>> + vmcs12->tsc_multiplier,
>> + vmcs12->tsc_offset);
>> + } else {
>> + cur_offset = l1_offset + vmcs12->tsc_offset;
>>
>> So I think you should just pass vmcs12 and the L1 offset to
>> kvm_compute_02_tsc_offset, and let it handle both cases (and possibly
>> even set vcpu->arch.tsc_scaling_ratio in the same function).
>
> That was my thinking initially too. However, kvm_compute_02_tsc_offset
> is defined in x86.c which is vmx-agnostic and hence 'struct vmcs12' is
> not defined there.
Good point. Yeah, it's trading one comde duplication for another.
Right now there's already code duplication in write_l1_tsc_offset, so it
makes some sense to limit duplication _within_ the file and lose in
duplicated code across vmx/svm, but either is okay.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 10:32 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: VMX: Implement nested TSC scaling ilstam
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: VMX: Add a TSC multiplier field in VMCS12 ilstam
2021-05-06 14:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 17:36 ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-10 13:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: X86: Store L1's TSC scaling ratio in 'struct kvm_vcpu_arch' ilstam
2021-05-10 13:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: X86: Pass an additional 'L1' argument to kvm_scale_tsc() ilstam
2021-05-10 13:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 15:44 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: VMX: Adjust the TSC-related VMCS fields on L2 entry and exit ilstam
2021-05-06 11:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-06 17:35 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-10 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-05-10 13:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 14:44 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-11 12:38 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-11 15:11 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: X86: Move tracing outside write_l1_tsc_offset() ilstam
2021-05-10 13:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: VMX: Make vmx_write_l1_tsc_offset() work with nested TSC scaling ilstam
2021-05-10 13:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 16:08 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-11 12:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-11 17:44 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: VMX: Expose TSC scaling to L2 ilstam
2021-05-10 13:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-06 10:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: selftests: x86: Add vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test ilstam
2021-05-10 13:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-11 11:16 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-11 12:47 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-11 14:02 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-06 17:16 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: VMX: Implement nested TSC scaling Jim Mattson
2021-05-06 17:48 ` Stamatis, Ilias
2021-05-10 13:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9506c826-face-e816-d88a-3797872f26d2@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ilstam@amazon.com \
--cc=ilstam@mailbox.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=zamsden@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).