kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>, stsp <stsp2@yandex.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
	Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support.
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:16:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGxU2F4v9_a9frgM61fh7UYTcWeGpNaAEXTUgnj8hvdU81PW5Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fd6fc75-c534-7f70-c116-50b1c804b594@yandex.ru>

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:59:30PM +0300, stsp wrote:
>15.01.2021 08:35, Arseny Krasnov пишет:
>>      This patchset impelements support of SOCK_SEQPACKET for virtio
>>transport.
>>      As SOCK_SEQPACKET guarantees to save record boundaries, so to
>>do it, new packet operation was added: it marks start of record (with
>>record length in header), such packet doesn't carry any data.  To send
>>record, packet with start marker is sent first, then all data is sent
>>as usual 'RW' packets. On receiver's side, length of record is known
>>from packet with start record marker. Now as  packets of one socket
>>are not reordered neither on vsock nor on vhost transport layers, such
>>marker allows to restore original record on receiver's side. If user's
>>buffer is smaller that
>
>than
>
>
>>  record length, when
>
>then
>
>
>>  v1 -> v2:
>>  - patches reordered: af_vsock.c changes now before virtio vsock
>>  - patches reorganized: more small patches, where +/- are not mixed
>
>If you did this because I asked, then this
>is not what I asked. :)
>You can't just add some static func in a
>separate patch, as it will just produce the
>compilation warning of an unused function.
>I only asked to separate the refactoring from
>the new code. I.e. if you move some code
>block to a separate function, you shouldn't
>split that into 2 patches, one that adds a
>code block and another one that removes it.
>It should be in one patch, so that it is clear
>what was moved, and no new warnings are
>introduced.
>What I asked to separate, is the old code
>moves with the new code additions. Such
>things can definitely go in a separate patches.

Arseny, thanks for the v2.
I appreciated that you moved the af_vsock changes before the transport
and also the test, but I agree with stsp about split patches.

As stsp suggested, you can have some "preparation" patches that touch
the already existing code (e.g. rename vsock_stream_sendmsg in
vsock_connectible_sendmsg() and call it inside the new
vsock_stream_sendmsg, etc.), then a patch that adds seqpacket stuff in
af_vsock.

Also for virtio/vhost transports, you can have some patches that add
support in virtio_transport_common, then a patch that enable it in
virtio_transport and a patch for vhost_vsock, as you rightly did in
patch 12.

So, I'd suggest moving out the code that touches virtio_transport.c
from patch 11.

These changes should simplify the review.

In addition, you can also remove the . from the commit titles.


I left other comments in the single patches.

Thanks,
Stefano


      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-15  5:35 Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] af_vsock: implement 'vsock_wait_data()' Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 14:51   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] af_vsock: separate rx loops for STREAM/SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 15:04   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] af_vsock: implement rx loops entry point Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] af_vsock: replace previous stream rx loop Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] af_vsock: implement send logic for SOCK_SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] af_vsock: general support of SOCK_SEQPACKET type Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 15:12   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 15:14   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] virtio/vsock: implement fetch of record length Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] virtio/vsock: update receive logic Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 15:15   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-18 15:15   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-15  5:45 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] vhost/vsock: support for SOCK_SEQPACKET socket Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  5:45 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests Arseny Krasnov
2021-01-15  9:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support stsp
2021-01-18 15:16   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGxU2F4v9_a9frgM61fh7UYTcWeGpNaAEXTUgnj8hvdU81PW5Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=andraprs@amazon.com \
    --cc=arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffv@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=stsp2@yandex.ru \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).