kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* KVM: arm64: vgic: Resample HW pending state on deactivation
@ 2021-08-18 18:40 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
  2021-08-18 18:42 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta @ 2021-08-18 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Alexandru Elisei, Suzuki K Poulose, James Morse, Peter Shier,
	Ricardo Koller, Oliver Upton, Reiji Watanabe, Jing Zhang,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata, kvm, kvmarm

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

When a mapped level interrupt (a timer, for example) is deactivated
by the guest, the corresponding host interrupt is equally deactivated.
However, the fate of the pending state still needs to be dealt
with in SW.

This is specially true when the interrupt was in the active+pending
state in the virtual distributor at the point where the guest
was entered. On exit, the pending state is potentially stale
(the guest may have put the interrupt in a non-pending state).

If we don't do anything, the interrupt will be spuriously injected
in the guest. Although this shouldn't have any ill effect (spurious
interrupts are always possible), we can improve the emulation by
detecting the deactivation-while-pending case and resample the
interrupt.

Reported-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
index 2c580204f1dc9..3e52ea86a87ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u32 val = cpuif->vgic_lr[lr];
 		u32 cpuid, intid = val & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
 		struct vgic_irq *irq;
+		bool deactivated;
 
 		/* Extract the source vCPU id from the LR */
 		cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
@@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		raw_spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
-		/* Always preserve the active bit */
+		/* Always preserve the active bit, note deactivation */
+		deactivated = irq->active && !(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
 		irq->active = !!(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
 
 		if (irq->active && vgic_irq_is_sgi(intid))
@@ -105,6 +107,12 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 * device state could have changed or we simply need to
 		 * process the still pending interrupt later.
 		 *
+		 * We could also have entered the guest with the interrupt
+		 * active+pending. On the next exit, we need to re-evaluate
+		 * the pending state, as it could otherwise result in a
+		 * spurious interrupt by injecting a now potentially stale
+		 * pending state.
+		 *
 		 * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
 		 * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
 		 * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
@@ -115,12 +123,15 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
 			bool resample = false;
 
-			if (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) {
-				irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
-				resample = !irq->line_level;
-			} else if (vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq) &&
-				   !(irq->active || irq->pending_latch)) {
-				resample = true;
+			if (unlikely(vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq))) {
+				if (!(irq->active || irq->pending_latch))
+					resample = true;
+			} else {
+				if ((val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) ||
+				    (deactivated && irq->line_level)) {
+					irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
+					resample = !irq->line_level;
+				}
 			}
 
 			if (resample)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
index 66004f61cd83d..74f9aefffd5e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u32 intid, cpuid;
 		struct vgic_irq *irq;
 		bool is_v2_sgi = false;
+		bool deactivated;
 
 		cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
 		cpuid >>= GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
@@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		raw_spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
-		/* Always preserve the active bit */
+		/* Always preserve the active bit, note deactivation */
+		deactivated = irq->active && !(val & ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
 		irq->active = !!(val & ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
 
 		if (irq->active && is_v2_sgi)
@@ -98,6 +100,12 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 * device state could have changed or we simply need to
 		 * process the still pending interrupt later.
 		 *
+		 * We could also have entered the guest with the interrupt
+		 * active+pending. On the next exit, we need to re-evaluate
+		 * the pending state, as it could otherwise result in a
+		 * spurious interrupt by injecting a now potentially stale
+		 * pending state.
+		 *
 		 * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
 		 * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
 		 * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
@@ -108,12 +116,15 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
 			bool resample = false;
 
-			if (val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) {
-				irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
-				resample = !irq->line_level;
-			} else if (vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq) &&
-				   !(irq->active || irq->pending_latch)) {
-				resample = true;
+			if (unlikely(vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq))) {
+				if (!(irq->active || irq->pending_latch))
+					resample = true;
+			} else {
+				if ((val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) ||
+				    (deactivated && irq->line_level)) {
+					irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
+					resample = !irq->line_level;
+				}
 			}
 
 			if (resample)
-- 
cgit 1.2.3-1.el7


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: KVM: arm64: vgic: Resample HW pending state on deactivation
  2021-08-18 18:40 KVM: arm64: vgic: Resample HW pending state on deactivation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
@ 2021-08-18 18:42 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta @ 2021-08-18 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Alexandru Elisei, Suzuki K Poulose, James Morse, Peter Shier,
	Ricardo Koller, Oliver Upton, Reiji Watanabe, Jing Zhang, kvm,
	kvmarm

Please ignore this. Sent by accident.

Regards,
Raghavendra

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:41 AM Raghavendra Rao Ananta
<rananta@google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> When a mapped level interrupt (a timer, for example) is deactivated
> by the guest, the corresponding host interrupt is equally deactivated.
> However, the fate of the pending state still needs to be dealt
> with in SW.
>
> This is specially true when the interrupt was in the active+pending
> state in the virtual distributor at the point where the guest
> was entered. On exit, the pending state is potentially stale
> (the guest may have put the interrupt in a non-pending state).
>
> If we don't do anything, the interrupt will be spuriously injected
> in the guest. Although this shouldn't have any ill effect (spurious
> interrupts are always possible), we can improve the emulation by
> detecting the deactivation-while-pending case and resample the
> interrupt.
>
> Reported-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> index 2c580204f1dc9..3e52ea86a87ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                 u32 val = cpuif->vgic_lr[lr];
>                 u32 cpuid, intid = val & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
>                 struct vgic_irq *irq;
> +               bool deactivated;
>
>                 /* Extract the source vCPU id from the LR */
>                 cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
> @@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>                 raw_spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> -               /* Always preserve the active bit */
> +               /* Always preserve the active bit, note deactivation */
> +               deactivated = irq->active && !(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
>                 irq->active = !!(val & GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
>
>                 if (irq->active && vgic_irq_is_sgi(intid))
> @@ -105,6 +107,12 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                  * device state could have changed or we simply need to
>                  * process the still pending interrupt later.
>                  *
> +                * We could also have entered the guest with the interrupt
> +                * active+pending. On the next exit, we need to re-evaluate
> +                * the pending state, as it could otherwise result in a
> +                * spurious interrupt by injecting a now potentially stale
> +                * pending state.
> +                *
>                  * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
>                  * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
>                  * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
> @@ -115,12 +123,15 @@ void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                 if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
>                         bool resample = false;
>
> -                       if (val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) {
> -                               irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
> -                               resample = !irq->line_level;
> -                       } else if (vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq) &&
> -                                  !(irq->active || irq->pending_latch)) {
> -                               resample = true;
> +                       if (unlikely(vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq))) {
> +                               if (!(irq->active || irq->pending_latch))
> +                                       resample = true;
> +                       } else {
> +                               if ((val & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) ||
> +                                   (deactivated && irq->line_level)) {
> +                                       irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
> +                                       resample = !irq->line_level;
> +                               }
>                         }
>
>                         if (resample)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 66004f61cd83d..74f9aefffd5e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                 u32 intid, cpuid;
>                 struct vgic_irq *irq;
>                 bool is_v2_sgi = false;
> +               bool deactivated;
>
>                 cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
>                 cpuid >>= GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
> @@ -68,7 +69,8 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>                 raw_spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> -               /* Always preserve the active bit */
> +               /* Always preserve the active bit, note deactivation */
> +               deactivated = irq->active && !(val & ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
>                 irq->active = !!(val & ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT);
>
>                 if (irq->active && is_v2_sgi)
> @@ -98,6 +100,12 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                  * device state could have changed or we simply need to
>                  * process the still pending interrupt later.
>                  *
> +                * We could also have entered the guest with the interrupt
> +                * active+pending. On the next exit, we need to re-evaluate
> +                * the pending state, as it could otherwise result in a
> +                * spurious interrupt by injecting a now potentially stale
> +                * pending state.
> +                *
>                  * If this causes us to lower the level, we have to also clear
>                  * the physical active state, since we will otherwise never be
>                  * told when the interrupt becomes asserted again.
> @@ -108,12 +116,15 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>                 if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
>                         bool resample = false;
>
> -                       if (val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) {
> -                               irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
> -                               resample = !irq->line_level;
> -                       } else if (vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq) &&
> -                                  !(irq->active || irq->pending_latch)) {
> -                               resample = true;
> +                       if (unlikely(vgic_irq_needs_resampling(irq))) {
> +                               if (!(irq->active || irq->pending_latch))
> +                                       resample = true;
> +                       } else {
> +                               if ((val & ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT) ||
> +                                   (deactivated && irq->line_level)) {
> +                                       irq->line_level = vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq);
> +                                       resample = !irq->line_level;
> +                               }
>                         }
>
>                         if (resample)
> --
> cgit 1.2.3-1.el7
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-18 18:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-18 18:40 KVM: arm64: vgic: Resample HW pending state on deactivation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2021-08-18 18:42 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).