Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Add AMD PerfMonV2 support

[Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>]

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 5:44 AM Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
>
> If AMD Performance Monitoring Version 2 (PerfMonV2) is detected
> by the guest, it can use a new scheme to manage the Core PMCs using
> the new global control and status registers.
>
> In addition to benefiting from the PerfMonV2 functionality in the same
> way as the host (higher precision), the guest also can reduce the number
> of vm-exits by lowering the total number of MSRs accesses.
>
> In terms of implementation details, amd_is_valid_msr() is resurrected
> since three newly added MSRs could not be mapped to one vPMC.
> The possibility of emulating PerfMonV2 on the mainframe has also
> been eliminated for reasons of precision.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c     |  6 +++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     | 11 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 7002e1b74108..56b4f898a246 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -455,12 +455,15 @@ int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>
>         switch (msr) {
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS:
>                 msr_info->data = pmu->global_status;
>                 return 0;
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL:
>                 msr_info->data = pmu->global_ctrl;
>                 return 0;
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR:
>                 msr_info->data = 0;
>                 return 0;
>         default:
> @@ -479,12 +482,14 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>
>         switch (msr) {
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS:
>                 if (msr_info->host_initiated) {
>                         pmu->global_status = data;
>                         return 0;
>                 }
>                 break; /* RO MSR */
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL:
>                 if (pmu->global_ctrl == data)
>                         return 0;
>                 if (kvm_valid_perf_global_ctrl(pmu, data)) {
> @@ -495,6 +500,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>                 }
>                 break;
>         case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR:
>                 if (!(data & pmu->global_ovf_ctrl_mask)) {
>                         if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
>                                 pmu->global_status &= ~data;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> index 3a20972e9f1a..4c7d408e3caa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> @@ -92,12 +92,6 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>         return amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc(vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu), idx & ~(3u << 30));
>  }
>
> -static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
> -{
> -       /* All MSRs refer to exactly one PMC, so msr_idx_to_pmc is enough.  */
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
>  static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>  {
>         struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> @@ -109,6 +103,29 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>         return pmc;
>  }
>
> +static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> +       switch (msr) {
> +       case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
> +               return pmu->version > 0;
> +       case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
> +               return guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE);
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL:
> +       case MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR:
> +               return pmu->version > 1;
> +       default:
> +               if (msr > MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5 &&
> +                   msr < MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 + 2 * KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC)
> +                       return pmu->version > 1;

Should this be bounded by guest CPUID.80000022H:EBX[NumCorePmc]
(unless host-initiated)?

> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       return amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr);
> +}
> +
>  static int amd_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  {
>         struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> @@ -162,20 +179,31 @@ static int amd_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  static void amd_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>         struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +       struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
> +       union cpuid_0x80000022_ebx ebx;
>
> -       if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE))
> +       pmu->version = 1;
> +       entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x80000022, 0);
> +       if (kvm_pmu_cap.version > 1 && entry && (entry->eax & BIT(0))) {
> +               pmu->version = 2;
> +               ebx.full = entry->ebx;
> +               pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = min3((unsigned int)ebx.split.num_core_pmc,
> +                                               (unsigned int)kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp,
> +                                               (unsigned int)KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC);
> +               pmu->global_ctrl_mask = ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
> +               pmu->global_ovf_ctrl_mask = pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
> +       } else if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE)) {
>                 pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE;

The logic above doesn't seem quite right, since guest_cpuid_has(vcpu,
X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) promises 6 PMCs, regardless of what
CPUID.80000022 says.