Re: [PATCH v11 11/46] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Handle HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST{,EX} calls gently

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>  int kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu_hv_tlb_flush_fifo *tlb_flush_fifo;
>  	struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu);
> +	u64 entries[KVM_HV_TLB_FLUSH_FIFO_SIZE];
> +	int i, j, count;
> +	gva_t gva;
>  
> -	if (!hv_vcpu)
> +	if (!tdp_enabled || !hv_vcpu)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	tlb_flush_fifo = &hv_vcpu->tlb_flush_fifo;
>  
> +	count = kfifo_out(&tlb_flush_fifo->entries, entries, KVM_HV_TLB_FLUSH_FIFO_SIZE);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		if (entries[i] == KVM_HV_TLB_FLUSHALL_ENTRY)
> +			goto out_flush_all;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Lower 12 bits of 'address' encode the number of additional
> +		 * pages to flush.
> +		 */
> +		gva = entries[i] & PAGE_MASK;
> +		for (j = 0; j < (entries[i] & ~PAGE_MASK) + 1; j++)
> +			static_call(kvm_x86_flush_tlb_gva)(vcpu, gva + j * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +		++vcpu->stat.tlb_flush;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_flush_all:
> +	kvm_vcpu_flush_tlb_guest(vcpu);

No need to do kvm_vcpu_flush_tlb_guest() here, the caller is responsible for
flushing on "failure", as indicated by -ENOSPC below.

>  	kfifo_reset_out(&tlb_flush_fifo->entries);
>  
> -	/* Precise flushing isn't implemented yet. */
> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	/* Fall back to full flush. */
> +	return -ENOSPC;
>  }