kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, bristot@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, greg@kroah.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joshdon@google.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched: Move SCHED_DEBUG sysctl to debugfs
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:17:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae04549f-b009-9d90-d312-5c544f5a5e14@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427110926.24f41fbb@gandalf.local.home>



On 27.04.21 17:09, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:59:25 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Peter,
>>
>> I just realized that we moved away sysctl tunabled to debugfs in next.
>> We have seen several cases where it was benefitial to set
>> sched_migration_cost_ns to a lower value. For example with KVM I can
>> easily get 50% more transactions with 50000 instead of 500000.
>> Until now it was possible to use tuned or /etc/sysctl.conf to set
>> these things permanently.
>>
>> Given that some people do not want to have debugfs mounted all the time
>> I would consider this a regression. The sysctl tunable was always
>> available.
>>
>> I am ok with the "informational" things being in debugfs, but not
>> the tunables. So how do we proceed here?
> 
> Should there be a schedfs created?
> 
> This is the reason I created the tracefs file system, was to get the
> tracing code out of debugfs, as debugfs is a catch all for everything and
> can lead to poor and insecure interfaces that people do not want to add on
> systems that they still want tracing on.
> 
> Or perhaps we should add a "tunefs" for tunables that are stable interfaces
> that should not be in /proc but also not in debugfs.

Yes, a tunefs or schedfs could be considered a replacement for sysctl.
It will still break existing setups with kernel.sched* things in /etc/sysctl.conf
but at least there is a stable transition path.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210412102001.287610138@infradead.org>
2021-04-27 14:59 ` sched: Move SCHED_DEBUG sysctl to debugfs Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-27 15:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-27 15:17     ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-04-28  8:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-28  8:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-28  8:54     ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-28  8:58       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-28  9:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-28  9:31         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-28  9:42     ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-28 12:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-28 14:49         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-07 12:34         ` [PATCH 0/1] Improve yield (was: sched: Move SCHED_DEBUG sysctl to debugfs) Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-07 12:34           ` [PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: improve yield_to vs fairness Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-07 18:07             ` kernel test robot
2021-07-23  9:35             ` Mel Gorman
2021-07-23 12:36               ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-23 16:21                 ` Mel Gorman
2021-07-26 18:41                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-26 19:32                     ` Mel Gorman
2021-07-27  6:59                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-27 18:57                     ` Benjamin Segall
2021-07-28 16:23                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-08-10  8:49                         ` Vincent Guittot
2021-07-27 13:29                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-27 13:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-27 14:31                 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae04549f-b009-9d90-d312-5c544f5a5e14@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).