kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:54:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d348d29f-c20a-717f-7124-d1c228f3213b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127141559.35250-5-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

On 1/27/22 15:15, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> Adds several tests to verify correct error paths of attestation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   lib/s390x/asm/uv.h |   5 +-
>   s390x/uv-guest.c   | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> index 38c322bf..e8e1698e 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> @@ -109,7 +109,10 @@ struct uv_cb_qui {
>   	u8  reserved88[158 - 136];	/* 0x0088 */
>   	uint16_t max_guest_cpus;	/* 0x009e */
>   	u64 uv_feature_indications;	/* 0x00a0 */
> -	u8  reserveda8[200 - 168];	/* 0x00a8 */
> +	u8  reserveda8[224 - 168];	/* 0x00a8 */
> +	u64 supported_att_hdr_versions;	/* 0x00e0 */
> +	u64 supported_paf;		/* 0x00e8 */
> +	u8  reservedf0[256 - 240];	/* 0x00f0 */
>   }  __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>   
>   struct uv_cb_cgc {
> diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> index 909b7256..92b9a53b 100644
> --- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
> +++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>    *
>    * Authors:
>    *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *  Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
>    */
>   
>   #include <libcflat.h>
> @@ -53,6 +54,15 @@ static void test_priv(void)
>   	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
>   	report_prefix_pop();
>   
> +	report_prefix_push("attest");
> +	uvcb.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION;
> +	uvcb.len = sizeof(struct uv_cb_attest);
> +	expect_pgm_int();
> +	enter_pstate();
> +	uv_call_once(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
>   	report_prefix_pop();
>   }
>   
> @@ -111,7 +121,160 @@ static void test_sharing(void)
>   	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
>   	report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "unshare");
>   	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/* arcb with one key slot and no nonce */
> +struct uv_arcb_v1 {
> +	uint64_t	reserved0;	/* 0x0000 */
> +	uint32_t	arvn;		/* 0x0008 */
> +	uint32_t	arl;		/* 0x000c */

req_ver and req_len ?

> +	uint8_t		iv[12];		/* 0x0010 */
> +	uint32_t	reserved1c;	/* 0x001c */
> +	uint8_t		reserved20[7];	/* 0x0020 */
> +	uint8_t		nks;		/* 0x0027 */
> +	uint32_t	reserved28;	/* 0x0028 */
> +	uint32_t	sea;		/* 0x002c */

sea and nks are also used elsewhere so I'm mostly fine with them.

> +	uint64_t	paf;		/* 0x0030 */

plaint_att_flags

> +	uint32_t	mai;		/* 0x0038 */

meass_alg_id

> +	uint32_t	reserved3c;	/* 0x003c */
> +	uint8_t		cpk[160];	/* 0x0040 */
> +	uint8_t		key_slot[80];	/* 0x00e0 */
> +	uint8_t		m_key[64];	/* 0x0130 */

meass_key

Although, to be honest I don't like the "meass" prefix

> +	uint8_t		tag[16];	/* 0x0170 */
> +} __attribute__((packed));

The amount of three letter abbreviations is too high in this struct.

> +
> +static void test_attest_v1(u64 supported_paf)
> +{
> +	struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
> +		.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
> +		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
> +	};
> +	struct uv_arcb_v1 *arcb = (void *)page;
> +	uint64_t measurement = page + sizeof(*arcb);
> +	size_t measurement_size = 64;
> +	uint64_t additional = measurement + measurement_size;
> +	size_t additional_size = 64;
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	memset((void *) page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	/* create a minimal arcb/uvcb such that FW has everything to start unsealing the request. */
> +	arcb->arvn = 0x0100;

Magic numbers

> +	arcb->arl = sizeof(*arcb);
> +	arcb->nks = 1;
> +	arcb->sea = 64;

sizeof(arcb->m_key) ?

It's sizeof(arcb->m_key) + sizeof(arcb->nonce_opt) (which doesn't exist 
in our struct above) for everyone wondering what's in sea.


> +	/* HMAC SHA512 */
> +	arcb->mai = 1;

Add a constant then you won't need the comment anymore.

> +	uvcb.arcb_addr = page;
> +	uvcb.measurement_address = measurement;
> +	uvcb.measurement_length = measurement_size;
> +	uvcb.add_data_address = additional;
> +	uvcb.add_data_length = additional_size;
> +
> +	uvcb.continuation_token = 0xff;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0101, "invalid continuation token");
> +	uvcb.continuation_token = 0;
> +
> +	uvcb.user_data_length = sizeof(uvcb.user_data) + 1;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0102, "invalid user data size");
> +	uvcb.user_data_length = 0;
> +
> +	uvcb.arcb_addr = 0;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0103, "invalid address arcb");
> +	uvcb.arcb_addr = page;
> +
> +	/* 0104 - 0105 need an unseal-able request */
> +
> +	/* version 0000 is an illegal version number */
> +	arcb->arvn = 0x0000;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0106, "unsupported version");
> +	arcb->arvn = 0x0100;
> +
> +	arcb->arl += 1;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "invalid arcb size 1");
> +	arcb->arl -= 1;
> +	arcb->nks = 2;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "invalid arcb size 2");
> +	arcb->nks = 1;
> +
> +	arcb->nks = 0;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0108, "invalid num key slots low");
> +	arcb->nks = 1;
>   
> +	/* possible valid size (when using nonce). However, arl to small to host a nonce */

s/to/too/

> +	arcb->sea = 80;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "invalid encrypted size 1");
> +	arcb->sea = 17;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "invalid encrypted size 2");
> +	arcb->sea = 64;
> +
> +	arcb->paf = supported_paf ^ ((u64) -1);
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010a, "invalid paf");
> +	arcb->paf = 0;
> +
> +	/* reserved value */
> +	arcb->mai = 0;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010b, "invalid mai");
> +	arcb->mai = 1;
> +
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010c, "unable unseal");
> +
> +	uvcb.measurement_length = 0;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010d, "invalid measurement size");
> +	uvcb.measurement_length = 64;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_attest(void)
> +{
> +	struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
> +		.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
> +		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
> +	};
> +	const struct uv_cb_qui *uvcb_qui = uv_get_info();
> +	int cc;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("attest");
> +
> +	if (!uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION)) {
> +		report_skip("Attestation not supported.");
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Verify that the uv supports at least one header version */
> +	report(uvcb_qui->supported_att_hdr_versions, "has hdr support");
> +
> +	memset((void *) page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	uvcb.header.len -= 1;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "invalid uvcb size 1");
> +	uvcb.header.len += 1;
> +
> +	uvcb.header.len += 1;
> +	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> +	report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "invalid uvcb size 2");
> +	uvcb.header.len -= 1;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("v1");
> +	if (test_bit_inv(0, &uvcb_qui->supported_att_hdr_versions))
> +		test_attest_v1(uvcb_qui->supported_paf);
> +	else
> +		report_skip("Attestation version 1 not supported");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +done:
>   	report_prefix_pop();
>   }
>   
> @@ -179,6 +342,7 @@ int main(void)
>   	test_invalid();
>   	test_query();
>   	test_sharing();
> +	test_attest();
>   	free_page((void *)page);
>   done:
>   	report_prefix_pop();
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-27 14:15 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] s390x: Attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-01-27 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] s390x: uv-host: Add attestation test Steffen Eiden
2022-01-28  9:00   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-28  9:29     ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-28  9:58       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-27 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] s390x: lib: Add QUI getter Steffen Eiden
2022-01-28  9:02   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-27 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] s390x: uv-guest: remove duplicated checks Steffen Eiden
2022-01-28  9:06   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-27 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-01-28  9:54   ` Janosch Frank [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d348d29f-c20a-717f-7124-d1c228f3213b@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).