Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/9] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test

[Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>]

On 2019-12-09 17:49, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri,  6 Dec 2019 17:26:25 +0100
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> First step for testing the channel subsystem is to enumerate the css and
>> retrieve the css devices.
>>
>> This tests the success of STSCH I/O instruction.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/s390x/css.h     |  1 +
>>   s390x/Makefile      |  2 ++
>>   s390x/css.c         | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   s390x/unittests.cfg |  4 +++
>>   4 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 s390x/css.c
>>
> 
>> +static void test_enumerate(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct pmcw *pmcw = &schib.pmcw;
>> +	int scn;
>> +	int cc, i;
>> +	int found = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (scn = 0; scn < 0xffff; scn++) {
>> +		cc = stsch(scn|SID_ONE, &schib);
>> +		if (!cc && (pmcw->flags & PMCW_DNV)) {
> 
> Not sure when dnv is actually applicable... it is used for I/O
> subchannels; chsc subchannels don't have a device; message subchannels
> use a different bit IIRC; not sure about EADM subchannels.
> 
> [Not very relevant as long as we run under KVM, but should be
> considered if you plan to run this test under z/VM or LPAR as well.]

Hum, interresting, I will check and modify accordingly.

> 
>> +			report_info("SID %04x Type %s PIM %x", scn,
>> +				     Channel_type[PMCW_CHANNEL_TYPE(pmcw)],
>> +				     pmcw->pim);
>> +			for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)  {
>> +				if ((pmcw->pim << i) & 0x80) {
>> +					report_info("CHPID[%d]: %02x", i,
>> +						    pmcw->chpid[i]);
>> +					break;
> 
> That 'break;' seems odd -- won't you end up printing the first chpid in
> the pim only?
yes
> 
> Maybe modify this loop to print the chpid if the path is in the pim,
> and 'n/a' or so if not?

OK

> 
>> +				}
>> +			}
>> +			found++;
>> +		}
>> +		if (cc == 3) /* cc = 3 means no more channel in CSS */
> 
> s/channel/subchannels/

thanks

> 
>> +			break;
>> +		if (found && !test_device_sid)
>> +			test_device_sid = scn|SID_ONE;
>> +	}
>> +	if (!found) {
>> +		report("Tested %d devices, none found", 0, scn);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +	report("Tested %d devices, %d found", 1, scn, found);
>> +}
> 

Thanks for the reviewing,
Regards,

Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen