kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 17/32] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
Date: Fri,  3 Feb 2023 13:50:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230203135043.409192-18-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203135043.409192-1-james.morse@arm.com>

struct acpi_scan_handler has a detach callback that is used to remove
a driver when a bus is changed. When interacting with an eject-request,
the detach callback is called before _EJ0.

This means the ACPI processor driver can't use _STA to determine if a
CPU has been made not-present, or some of the other _STA bits have been
changed. acpi_processor_remove() needs to know the value of _STA after
_EJ0 has been called.

Add a post_eject callback to struct acpi_scan_handler. This is called
after acpi_scan_hot_remove() has successfully called _EJ0. Because
acpi_bus_trim_one() also clears the handler pointer, it needs to be
told if the caller will go on to call acpi_bus_post_eject(), so
that acpi_device_clear_enumerated() and clearing the handler pointer
can be deferred. The existing not-used pointer is used for this.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |  4 +--
 drivers/acpi/scan.c           | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h       |  1 +
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 6ab55f109417..ab0f80b83773 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU
 /* Removal */
-static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
+static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	struct acpi_processor *pr;
 
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = {
 	.ids = processor_device_ids,
 	.attach = acpi_processor_add,
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU
-	.detach = acpi_processor_remove,
+	.post_eject = acpi_processor_post_eject,
 #endif
 	.hotplug = {
 		.enabled = true,
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index cecf94192771..cd9bedb54393 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -245,18 +245,28 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_bus_trim_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
+/**
+ * acpi_bus_trim_one() - Detach scan handlers and drivers from ACPI device
+ *                       objects.
+ * @adev:       Root of the ACPI namespace scope to walk.
+ * @eject:      Pointer to a bool that indicates if this was due to an
+ *              eject-request.
+ *
+ * Must be called under acpi_scan_lock.
+ * If @eject points to true, clearing the device enumeration is deferred until
+ * acpi_bus_post_eject() is called.
+ */
+static int acpi_bus_trim_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *eject)
 {
 	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+	bool is_eject = *(bool *)eject;
 
-	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_trim_one, NULL);
+	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_trim_one, eject);
 
 	adev->flags.match_driver = false;
 	if (handler) {
 		if (handler->detach)
 			handler->detach(adev);
-
-		adev->handler = NULL;
 	} else {
 		device_release_driver(&adev->dev);
 	}
@@ -266,7 +276,12 @@ static int acpi_bus_trim_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
 	 */
 	acpi_device_set_power(adev, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
 	adev->flags.initialized = false;
-	acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev);
+
+	/* For eject this is deferred to acpi_bus_post_eject() */
+	if (!is_eject) {
+		adev->handler = NULL;
+		acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -279,15 +294,36 @@ static int acpi_bus_trim_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
  */
 void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	acpi_bus_trim_one(adev, NULL);
+	bool eject = false;
+
+	acpi_bus_trim_one(adev, &eject);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);
 
+static int acpi_bus_post_eject(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
+{
+	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+
+	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_post_eject, NULL);
+
+	if (handler) {
+		if (handler->post_eject)
+			handler->post_eject(adev);
+
+		adev->handler = NULL;
+	}
+
+	acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
 	unsigned long long sta;
 	acpi_status status;
+	bool eject = true;
 
 	if (device->handler && device->handler->hotplug.demand_offline) {
 		if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(device, true))
@@ -300,7 +336,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 	acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Ejecting\n");
 
-	acpi_bus_trim(device);
+	acpi_bus_trim_one(device, &eject);
 
 	acpi_evaluate_lck(handle, 0);
 	/*
@@ -323,6 +359,8 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	} else if (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
 		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
 			"Eject incomplete - status 0x%llx\n", sta);
+	} else {
+		acpi_bus_post_eject(device, NULL);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index cd3b75e08ec3..dc4028cafd33 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct acpi_scan_handler {
 	bool (*match)(const char *idstr, const struct acpi_device_id **matchid);
 	int (*attach)(struct acpi_device *dev, const struct acpi_device_id *id);
 	void (*detach)(struct acpi_device *dev);
+	void (*post_eject)(struct acpi_device *dev);
 	void (*bind)(struct device *phys_dev);
 	void (*unbind)(struct device *phys_dev);
 	struct acpi_hotplug_profile hotplug;
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03 13:50 [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 01/32] ia64: Fix build error due to switch case label appearing next to declaration James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 02/32] ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be enabled per architecture James Morse
2023-08-30 18:31   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 03/32] drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 04/32] drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 05/32] drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 06/32] arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 07/32] ia64/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 08/32] x86/topology: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 09/32] LoongArch: " James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 10/32] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 11/32] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 12/32] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 13/32] ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 14/32] ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present' James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/32] ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/32] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` James Morse [this message]
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/32] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/32] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/32] drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/32] LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/32] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/32] ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?] James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/32] arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a helper James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/32] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/32] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/32] ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/32] KVM: arm64: Pass hypercalls to userspace James Morse
2023-02-03 21:08   ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50     ` James Morse
2023-02-08  9:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-05 10:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-06 10:10     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 12:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07  9:41         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-07 11:23           ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-07 12:46             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-02-06 17:19     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 17:50     ` James Morse
2023-02-08  8:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-08 14:25         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-11  1:44       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 30/32] KVM: arm64: Pass PSCI calls " James Morse
2023-05-23  9:32   ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-12 17:01     ` James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 31/32] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations James Morse
2023-02-03 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 32/32] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online James Morse
2023-03-07 12:00 ` [RFC PATCH 00/32] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-13 15:50   ` James Morse
2023-03-14 11:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-29  2:35 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-12 17:01   ` James Morse
2023-09-12 22:38     ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 15:28       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-03-29  5:52 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-04-03  6:25   ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230203135043.409192-18-james.morse@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).