* [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources
@ 2022-02-03 19:31 Robin Murphy
2022-02-08 11:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-09 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2022-02-03 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lorenzo.pieralisi, guohanjun, sudeep.holla
Cc: linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, Michael Petlan
The original version of the IORT PMCG definition had an oversight
wherein there was no way to describe the second register page for an
implementation using the recommended RELOC_CTRS feature. Although the
spec was fixed, and the final patches merged to ACPICA and Linux written
against the new version, it seems that some old firmware based on the
original revision has survived and turned up in the wild.
Add a check for the original PMCG definition, and avoid filling in the
second memory resource with nonsense if so. Otherwise it is likely that
something horrible will happen when the PMCG driver attempts to probe.
Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Fixes: 24e516049360 ("ACPI/IORT: Add support for PMCG")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
v2: Simpler workaround, since I realised platform_get_resource()
should happily just skip over a zero-initialised hole in the
resource array.
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index 175397913be1..7092b94b2aae 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -1371,9 +1371,17 @@ static void __init arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_init_resources(struct resource *res,
res[0].start = pmcg->page0_base_address;
res[0].end = pmcg->page0_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
- res[1].start = pmcg->page1_base_address;
- res[1].end = pmcg->page1_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
- res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
+ /*
+ * The initial version in DEN0049C lacked a way to describe register
+ * page 1, which makes it broken for most PMCG implementations; in
+ * that case, just let the driver fail gracefully if it expects to
+ * find a second memory resource.
+ */
+ if (node->revision > 0) {
+ res[1].start = pmcg->page1_base_address;
+ res[1].end = pmcg->page1_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
+ res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
+ }
if (pmcg->overflow_gsiv)
acpi_iort_register_irq(pmcg->overflow_gsiv, "overflow",
--
2.28.0.dirty
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources
2022-02-03 19:31 [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources Robin Murphy
@ 2022-02-08 11:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-09 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2022-02-08 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin Murphy, will, catalin.marinas
Cc: guohanjun, sudeep.holla, linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, Michael Petlan
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:31:24PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The original version of the IORT PMCG definition had an oversight
> wherein there was no way to describe the second register page for an
> implementation using the recommended RELOC_CTRS feature. Although the
> spec was fixed, and the final patches merged to ACPICA and Linux written
> against the new version, it seems that some old firmware based on the
> original revision has survived and turned up in the wild.
>
> Add a check for the original PMCG definition, and avoid filling in the
> second memory resource with nonsense if so. Otherwise it is likely that
> something horrible will happen when the PMCG driver attempts to probe.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 24e516049360 ("ACPI/IORT: Add support for PMCG")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Simpler workaround, since I realised platform_get_resource()
> should happily just skip over a zero-initialised hole in the
> resource array.
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Should we send it to stable kernels ?
I'd kindly ask Catalin/Will to pick it up please.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 175397913be1..7092b94b2aae 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -1371,9 +1371,17 @@ static void __init arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_init_resources(struct resource *res,
> res[0].start = pmcg->page0_base_address;
> res[0].end = pmcg->page0_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
> res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> - res[1].start = pmcg->page1_base_address;
> - res[1].end = pmcg->page1_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
> - res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + /*
> + * The initial version in DEN0049C lacked a way to describe register
> + * page 1, which makes it broken for most PMCG implementations; in
> + * that case, just let the driver fail gracefully if it expects to
> + * find a second memory resource.
> + */
> + if (node->revision > 0) {
> + res[1].start = pmcg->page1_base_address;
> + res[1].end = pmcg->page1_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
> + res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + }
>
> if (pmcg->overflow_gsiv)
> acpi_iort_register_irq(pmcg->overflow_gsiv, "overflow",
> --
> 2.28.0.dirty
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources
2022-02-03 19:31 [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources Robin Murphy
2022-02-08 11:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
@ 2022-02-09 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2022-02-09 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin Murphy, guohanjun, sudeep.holla, lorenzo.pieralisi
Cc: Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, linux-acpi, Michael Petlan
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 19:31:24 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The original version of the IORT PMCG definition had an oversight
> wherein there was no way to describe the second register page for an
> implementation using the recommended RELOC_CTRS feature. Although the
> spec was fixed, and the final patches merged to ACPICA and Linux written
> against the new version, it seems that some old firmware based on the
> original revision has survived and turned up in the wild.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/da5fb9e1ad3f
(also added a cc stable)
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-09 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-03 19:31 [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Check node revision for PMCG resources Robin Murphy
2022-02-08 11:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-02-09 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).