linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: Use CXL _OSC instead of PCIe _OSC
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 18:27:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317002704.1835870-2-vishal.l.verma@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317002704.1835870-1-vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

In preparation for negotiating OS control of CXL _OSC features, do the
minimal enabling to use CXL _OSC to handle the base PCIe feature
negotiation. Recall that CXL _OSC is a super-set of PCIe _OSC and the
CXL 2.0 specification mandates: "If a CXL Host Bridge device exposes CXL
_OSC, CXL aware OSPM shall evaluate CXL _OSC and not evaluate PCIe
_OSC."

A new ->cxl_osc_disable attribute is added for cases where platform
firmware publishes ACPI0016, but does not also publish CXL _OSC.

Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index ca88c4706f2b..768ef1584055 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ struct acpi_pci_root {
 	struct acpi_device * device;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	u16 segment;
+	bool cxl_osc_disable;
 	struct resource secondary;	/* downstream bus range */
 
 	u32 osc_support_set;	/* _OSC state of support bits */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index b76db99cced3..2d834504096b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -170,20 +170,47 @@ static void decode_osc_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, char *msg, u32 word)
 			ARRAY_SIZE(pci_osc_control_bit));
 }
 
-static u8 pci_osc_uuid_str[] = "33DB4D5B-1FF7-401C-9657-7441C03DD766";
+static bool is_pcie(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+	return strcmp(acpi_device_hid(root->device), "PNP0A08") == 0;
+}
 
-static acpi_status acpi_pci_run_osc(acpi_handle handle,
+static bool is_cxl(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+	if (root->cxl_osc_disable)
+		return false;
+	return strcmp(acpi_device_hid(root->device), "ACPI0016") == 0;
+}
+
+static u8 pci_osc_uuid_str[] = "33DB4D5B-1FF7-401C-9657-7441C03DD766";
+static u8 cxl_osc_uuid_str[] = "68F2D50B-C469-4d8A-BD3D-941A103FD3FC";
+
+static char *to_uuid(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+	if (is_cxl(root))
+		return cxl_osc_uuid_str;
+	return pci_osc_uuid_str;
+}
+
+static int cap_length(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
+{
+	if (is_cxl(root))
+		return sizeof(u32) * 6;
+	return sizeof(u32) * 3;
+}
+
+static acpi_status acpi_pci_run_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 				    const u32 *capbuf, u32 *retval)
 {
 	struct acpi_osc_context context = {
-		.uuid_str = pci_osc_uuid_str,
+		.uuid_str = to_uuid(root),
 		.rev = 1,
-		.cap.length = 12,
+		.cap.length = cap_length(root),
 		.cap.pointer = (void *)capbuf,
 	};
 	acpi_status status;
 
-	status = acpi_run_osc(handle, &context);
+	status = acpi_run_osc(root->device->handle, &context);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 		*retval = *((u32 *)(context.ret.pointer + 8));
 		kfree(context.ret.pointer);
@@ -196,7 +223,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 					u32 *control)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
-	u32 result, capbuf[3];
+	u32 result, capbuf[6];
 
 	support |= root->osc_support_set;
 
@@ -204,10 +231,18 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
 	capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
 	capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
 
-	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
+retry:
+	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root, capbuf, &result);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 		root->osc_support_set = support;
 		*control = result;
+	} else if (is_cxl(root)) {
+		/*
+		 * CXL _OSC is optional on CXL 1.1 hosts. Fall back to PCIe _OSC
+		 * upon any failure using CXL _OSC.
+		 */
+		root->cxl_osc_disable = true;
+		goto retry;
 	}
 	return status;
 }
@@ -338,7 +373,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 s
 	u32 req = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL;
 	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
 	acpi_status status;
-	u32 ctrl, capbuf[3];
+	u32 ctrl, capbuf[6];
 
 	if (!mask)
 		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
@@ -375,7 +410,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 s
 	capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0;
 	capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = root->osc_support_set;
 	capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = ctrl;
-	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(handle, capbuf, mask);
+	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root, capbuf, mask);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return status;
 
@@ -454,8 +489,7 @@ static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
-				 bool is_pcie)
+static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
 {
 	u32 support, control = 0, requested = 0;
 	acpi_status status;
@@ -506,7 +540,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
 		*no_aspm = 1;
 
 		/* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
-		if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
+		if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie(root))
 			return;
 
 		if (control) {
@@ -529,7 +563,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
 	int no_aspm = 0;
 	bool hotadd = system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
-	bool is_pcie;
 
 	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!root)
@@ -587,8 +620,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 
 	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
 
-	is_pcie = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), "PNP0A08") == 0;
-	negotiate_os_control(root, &no_aspm, is_pcie);
+	negotiate_os_control(root, &no_aspm);
 
 	/*
 	 * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
-- 
2.35.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17  0:27 [RFC PATCH 0/2] acpi: add support for CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-17  0:27 ` Vishal Verma [this message]
2022-03-17  1:47   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: Use CXL _OSC instead of PCIe _OSC Dan Williams
2022-03-17 15:40     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-17  0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] acpi/pci_root: negotiate CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-17  3:19   ` Dan Williams
2022-03-17  3:49     ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-17 16:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-18 21:16     ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-17 15:19 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] acpi: add support for " Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-18 19:52   ` Verma, Vishal L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220317002704.1835870-2-vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).