linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ACPICA: DEBUGGER: Add return value check to acpi_db_walk_for_fields()
@ 2021-12-29 17:40 shenzijun
  2021-12-30 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: shenzijun @ 2021-12-29 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: robert.moore, rafael.j.wysocki, lenb
  Cc: linux-acpi, devel, linux-kernel, jinzi120021

From: Zijun Shen <shenzijun@kylinos.cn>

The function acpi_db_walk_for_fields frees buffer.pointer by the
first ACPI_FREE. And then uses the second ACPI_FREE to free
buffer.pointer which may assigns again in acpi_evaluate_object.
It's necessary to make sure that buffer.pointer get a block of
memory in acpi_evaluate_object and acpi_evaluate_object return 0.

Signed-off-by: Zijun Shen <shenzijun@kylinos.cn>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
index 3615e1a6efd8..7a2d980cb2b8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
@@ -550,7 +550,10 @@ acpi_db_walk_for_fields(acpi_handle obj_handle,
 	ACPI_FREE(buffer.pointer);
 
 	buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_LOCAL_BUFFER;
-	acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		return (AE_OK);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Since this is a field unit, surround the output in braces
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: DEBUGGER: Add return value check to acpi_db_walk_for_fields()
  2021-12-29 17:40 [PATCH] ACPICA: DEBUGGER: Add return value check to acpi_db_walk_for_fields() shenzijun
@ 2021-12-30 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-12-30 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shenzijun
  Cc: Robert Moore, Rafael Wysocki, Len Brown, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA),
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, jinzi120021

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:41 AM shenzijun <shenzijun@kylinos.cn> wrote:
>
> From: Zijun Shen <shenzijun@kylinos.cn>
>
> The function acpi_db_walk_for_fields frees buffer.pointer by the
> first ACPI_FREE. And then uses the second ACPI_FREE to free
> buffer.pointer which may assigns again in acpi_evaluate_object.
> It's necessary to make sure that buffer.pointer get a block of
> memory in acpi_evaluate_object and acpi_evaluate_object return 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Shen <shenzijun@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
> index 3615e1a6efd8..7a2d980cb2b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c
> @@ -550,7 +550,10 @@ acpi_db_walk_for_fields(acpi_handle obj_handle,
>         ACPI_FREE(buffer.pointer);
>
>         buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_LOCAL_BUFFER;
> -       acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
> +       status = acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
> +       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +               return (AE_OK);
> +       }
>
>         /*
>          * Since this is a field unit, surround the output in braces
> --


This is ACPICA material, so please submit it to the upstream ACPICA
project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica/

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-30 16:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-29 17:40 [PATCH] ACPICA: DEBUGGER: Add return value check to acpi_db_walk_for_fields() shenzijun
2021-12-30 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).