From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney"
<paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-api <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>,
rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.c>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.16 02/21] rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call (v12)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:20:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214212023.GJ3326@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712141512360.8945@nuc-kabylake>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:14:00PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > If we port this concept to kernel-space (as I start to understand
> > would be your wish), then a simple pointer store to the current
> > task_struct would suffice.
>
> Certainly such a port would be beneficial for non x86 archs.
>
> But my company has extensive user space code that maintains a lot of
> counters and does other tricks to get full performance out of the
> hardware. Such a mechanism would also be good from user space. Why keep
> the good stuff only inside the kernel?
Mathieu's proposal is for userspace, _only_ userspace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-14 16:13 [RFC PATCH for 4.16 00/21] Restartable sequences and CPU op vector Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 01/21] uapi headers: Provide types_32_64.h Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 02/21] rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call (v12) Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:44 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-14 18:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <12046460.34426.1513275177081.JavaMail.zimbra-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-14 18:50 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-14 19:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 21:14 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-14 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-12-15 15:05 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-15 16:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <729438855.35910.1513356742518.JavaMail.zimbra-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-15 17:13 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-14 19:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-14 19:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <1772818221.34575.1513281428902.JavaMail.zimbra-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-14 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 03/21] arm: Add restartable sequences support Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 04/21] arm: Wire up restartable sequences system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 05/21] x86: Add support for restartable sequences Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 06/21] x86: Wire up restartable sequence system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 08/21] powerpc: Wire up restartable sequences " Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 09/21] sched: Implement push_task_to_cpu Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 10/21] cpu_opv: Provide cpu_opv system call (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20171214161403.30643-11-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-12 15:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 11/21] x86: Wire up cpu_opv system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 12/21] powerpc: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 14/21] selftests: lib.mk: Introduce OVERRIDE_TARGETS Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 15/21] cpu_opv: selftests: Implement selftests (v6) Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 16/21] rseq: selftests: Provide rseq library (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20171214161403.30643-1-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 07/21] powerpc: Add support for restartable sequences Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 13/21] arm: Wire up cpu_opv system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 17/21] rseq: selftests: Provide percpu_op API Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 18/21] rseq: selftests: Provide basic test Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 19/21] rseq: selftests: Provide basic percpu ops test Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 20/21] rseq: selftests: Provide parametrized tests Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-12-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.16 21/21] rseq: selftests: Provide Makefile, scripts, gitignore Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214212023.GJ3326@worktop \
--to=peterz-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bmaurer-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.c \
--cc=cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).