From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"René Nyffenegger" <mail@renenyffenegger.ch>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Nicolas Pitre" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:41:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZG1WR5QktwEsfe0MCyRW+1gKJg3axM29QkF-=J4qe6uYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWE5KzrAC6Os3y0f9CJMnM6znQQSSaexin8CC8JB9q1bQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:24:53PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>> @@ -191,6 +191,22 @@ extern struct trace_event_functions exit_syscall_print_funcs;
>>> SYSCALL_METADATA(sname, x, __VA_ARGS__) \
>>> __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
>>>
>>> +asmlinkage void verify_pre_usermode_state(void);
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SYSCALL_VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE
>>> +static inline bool has_user_ds(void) {
>>> + bool ret = segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS);
>>> + // Prevent re-ordering the call
>>
>> This is not the kernel comments style. Use /* */ instead.
>>
>>> + barrier();
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline bool has_user_ds(void) {
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>
>> ... and then you could slim down the ifdeffery a bit:
>>
>> static inline bool has_user_ds(void) {
>> bool ret = false;
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SYSCALL_VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE
>> ret = segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS);
>> /* Prevent re-ordering the call. */
>> barrier();
>> #endif
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> I don't like having any kernel configuration in which has_user_ds()
> unconditionally returns false. Can we put the ifdeffery in the caller
> instead?
I don't like it either to be honest. We could have something like:
#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SYSCALL_VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE
#define CHECK_USER_CALLER(_x) bool _x = segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)
#else
#define CHECK_USER_CALLER(_x) bool _x = false
#endif
// In the syscall macro:
CHECK_CALLED_BY_USER(user_caller);
>
> --Andy
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 1:24 [PATCH v2 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 12:23 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-09 15:56 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 16:05 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-09 16:19 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 16:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-03-09 16:35 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 17:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-03-09 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 15:48 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 17:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-09 17:41 ` Thomas Garnier [this message]
2017-03-09 10:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-09 12:09 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-09 13:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-03-09 15:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-09 15:54 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 15:52 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-09 12:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-03-09 15:53 ` Thomas Garnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJcbSZG1WR5QktwEsfe0MCyRW+1gKJg3axM29QkF-=J4qe6uYg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@renenyffenegger.ch \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).