From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
Will Drewry <wad-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Pratyush Anand <panand-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] x86/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 22:48:46 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707062247520.3239@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcbSZE6Og4gwhFwhy_-Jaq6GovwN3y1B6O89JmkpXHtVfDLBA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> Ensure the address limit is a user-mode segment before returning to
> > >> user-mode. Otherwise a process can corrupt kernel-mode memory and elevate
> > >> privileges [1].
> > >>
> > >> The set_fs function sets the TIF_SETFS flag to force a slow path on
> > >> return. In the slow path, the address limit is checked to be USER_DS if
> > >> needed.
> > >>
> > >> The addr_limit_user_check function is added as a cross-architecture
> > >> function to check the address limit.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=990
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > > Thanks for reworking this series!
> > >
> > > The bad state correctly BUGs under the LKDTM test:
> > >
> > > [ 21.171586] lkdtm: Performing direct entry CORRUPT_USER_DS
> > > [ 21.172791] lkdtm: setting bad task size limit
> > > [ 21.173742] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 21.174641] kernel BUG at ./include/linux/syscalls.h:220!
> > > ...
> > > [ 21.193166] Call Trace:
> > > [ 21.193617] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
> > > [ 21.194443] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
> > >
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > Is everyone happy with this patch for x86? Does this need anything
> > more/different?
>
> Asking again. Additional feedback? Anyone wants to pick-it up?
Can do. This needs to be a combo of all 3 I assume as the x86 one contains
the function used by all of them, right?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-15 1:12 [PATCH v10 1/3] x86/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return Thomas Garnier
2017-06-15 1:12 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] arm/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <20170615011203.144108-2-thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 20:18 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAGXu5jLR7io8u-M8tqbYW22C+sb2a2wSYLRBqJ_dguT4x+1tsQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 20:31 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-06-21 9:08 ` Will Deacon
2017-07-18 14:36 ` Leonard Crestez
2017-07-18 16:04 ` Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <CAJcbSZEr8HPBwH1oVaHqPzAY4MS_=yqMoqPhcauuKu3cikB3uQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-18 17:18 ` Leonard Crestez
2017-07-18 19:04 ` Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <CAJcbSZFr9KJTfGfiZo2fThoDkAE-D1OFf2YtELq4P6jX8syesQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-19 14:58 ` Leonard Crestez
[not found] ` <1500476300.22834.13.camel-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-19 16:51 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-07-19 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-19 17:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <CAJcbSZHi6454skNpG8ecMnq90LdUfcxy2RYZD+7og1C1PeypvQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-19 18:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-19 18:50 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-06-15 1:12 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] arm64/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <20170615011203.144108-3-thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-21 8:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-06-21 13:57 ` Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <20170615011203.144108-1-thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 20:24 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] x86/syscalls: " Kees Cook
2017-06-28 17:52 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CAGXu5jKrJv0y70e5JiafKGcGzWoJPZM_HruZ=Y0rM1m0J4tZAA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-06 20:38 ` Thomas Garnier
[not found] ` <CAJcbSZE6Og4gwhFwhy_-Jaq6GovwN3y1B6O89JmkpXHtVfDLBA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-06 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-07-06 20:52 ` Thomas Garnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1707062247520.3239@nanos \
--to=tglx-hfztesqfncyowbw4kg4ksq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jpoimboe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mbenes-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=panand-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pmladek-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thgarnie-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wad-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).