linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"René Nyffenegger" <mail@renenyffenegger.ch>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Stanislav Kinsburskiy" <skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:46 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1703082256480.23532@knanqh.ubzr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308213844.131877-3-thgarnie@google.com>

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Thomas Garnier wrote:

> Implement specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state for user-mode
> returns for arm.
> ---
> Based on next-20170308
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig               | 1 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 0d4e71b42c77..704fd8f197fa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARM
>  	select ARCH_HAVE_CUSTOM_GPIO_H
>  	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
>  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
> +	select ARCH_NO_SYSCALL_VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE
>  	select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>  	select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT if CPU_V7
>  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> index eb5cd77bf1d8..80cfdc7fabde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
>  ret_fast_syscall:
>   UNWIND(.fnstart	)
>   UNWIND(.cantunwind	)
> +	push	{r0}				@ save returned r0
> +	bl	verify_pre_usermode_state
> +	pop	{r0}				@ restore r0
>  	disable_irq_notrace			@ disable interrupts
>  	ldr	r1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS]		@ re-check for syscall tracing
>  	tst	r1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK | _TIF_WORK_MASK

This feature is configurable, right?

Here the branch overhead is imposed even if the feature is configured 
out. You should consider conditionally defining a macro like some other 
features do.

Furthermore I think we still support old toolchains that don't know what 
push and pop mean. You should use the legacy syntax instead.


Nicolas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 21:38 [PATCH v1 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] arm/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:49   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-03-08 22:05   ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2017-03-08 22:33     ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] arm64/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall Kees Cook
2017-03-09  1:13   ` Thomas Garnier
2017-03-08 21:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-03-08 22:20   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 22:27     ` Thomas Garnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1703082256480.23532@knanqh.ubzr \
    --to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@renenyffenegger.ch \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=skinsbursky@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).