From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Lindroth <thomas.lindroth@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] "Locked" and "Pss" in /proc/*/smaps are the same
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:46:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f31b26d0-b94e-b545-8776-a4494179149d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOZuev9K0EMpqBoie4H7XduB63KayORxO=JEZvS9rv_4PVsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/03/2018 06:20 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>> +CC
>>
>> On 07/01/2018 08:31 PM, Thomas Lindroth wrote:
>>> While looking around in /proc on my v4.14.52 system I noticed that
>>> all processes got a lot of "Locked" memory in /proc/*/smaps. A lot
>>> more memory than a regular user can usually lock with mlock().
>>>
>>> commit 493b0e9d945fa9dfe96be93ae41b4ca4b6fdb317 (v4.14-rc1) seems
>>> to have changed the behavior of "Locked".
>
> Thanks for fixing that. I submitted a patch [1] for this bug and some
> others a while ago, but the patch didn't make it into the tree because
> or wasn't split up correctly or something, and I had to do other work.
Hmm I see. I pondered about the patch and wondered if the scenarios it
fixes are really possible for smaps_rollup. Did you observe them in
practice? Namely:
- when seq_file starts and stops multiple times on a single open file
description
- when it issues multiple show calls for the same iterator value
I don't think it can happen when all positions but the last one just
return SEQ_SKIP.
Anyway I think the seq_file iterator API usage for smaps_rollup is
unnecessary. Semantically the file shows only one "element" and that's
the set of rollup values for all vmas. Letting seq_file do the iteration
over vmas brings only complications?
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=151927723128134&w=2
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-01 18:31 [REGRESSION] "Locked" and "Pss" in /proc/*/smaps are the same Thomas Lindroth
2018-07-03 7:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-03 7:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-07-03 16:20 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-07-04 8:46 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f31b26d0-b94e-b545-8776-a4494179149d@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=thomas.lindroth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).