From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Larry Woodman" <lwoodman@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:15:23 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0a4fd80a-c3ec-5cb3-6996-bb1562c1bf58@amd.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20161110105114.oiwcgpb436dxrdpb@pd.tnic> On 11/10/2016 4:51 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:34:39PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> This patch adds a Documenation entry to decribe the AMD Secure Memory >> Encryption (SME) feature. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> >> --- >> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++ >> Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> index 030e9e9..4c730b0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> @@ -2282,6 +2282,11 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted. >> memory contents and reserves bad memory >> regions that are detected. >> >> + mem_encrypt= [X86-64] Enable AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) >> + Memory encryption is disabled by default, using this >> + switch, memory encryption can be enabled. > > I'd say here: > > "Force-enable memory encryption if it is disabled in the > BIOS." Good suggestion, that will make this clearer. > >> + on: enable memory encryption >> + >> meye.*= [HW] Set MotionEye Camera parameters >> See Documentation/video4linux/meye.txt. >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..788d871 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ >> +Secure Memory Encryption (SME) is a feature found on AMD processors. >> + >> +SME provides the ability to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted using >> +the standard x86 page tables. A page that is marked encrypted will be >> +automatically decrypted when read from DRAM and encrypted when written to >> +DRAM. SME can therefore be used to protect the contents of DRAM from physical >> +attacks on the system. >> + >> +A page is encrypted when a page table entry has the encryption bit set (see >> +below how to determine the position of the bit). The encryption bit can be >> +specified in the cr3 register, allowing the PGD table to be encrypted. Each >> +successive level of page tables can also be encrypted. >> + >> +Support for SME can be determined through the CPUID instruction. The CPUID >> +function 0x8000001f reports information related to SME: >> + >> + 0x8000001f[eax]: >> + Bit[0] indicates support for SME >> + 0x8000001f[ebx]: >> + Bit[5:0] pagetable bit number used to enable memory encryption >> + Bit[11:6] reduction in physical address space, in bits, when >> + memory encryption is enabled (this only affects system >> + physical addresses, not guest physical addresses) >> + >> +If support for SME is present, MSR 0xc00100010 (SYS_CFG) can be used to >> +determine if SME is enabled and/or to enable memory encryption: >> + >> + 0xc0010010: >> + Bit[23] 0 = memory encryption features are disabled >> + 1 = memory encryption features are enabled >> + >> +Linux relies on BIOS to set this bit if BIOS has determined that the reduction >> +in the physical address space as a result of enabling memory encryption (see >> +CPUID information above) will not conflict with the address space resource >> +requirements for the system. If this bit is not set upon Linux startup then >> +Linux itself will not set it and memory encryption will not be possible. >> + >> +SME support is configurable through the AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT config option. >> +Additionally, the mem_encrypt=on command line parameter is required to activate >> +memory encryption. > > So how am I to understand this? We won't have TSME or we will but it > will be off by default and users will have to enable it in the BIOS or > will have to boot with mem_encrypt=on...? > > Can you please expand on all the possible options there would be > available to users? Yup, I'll try to expand on the documentation to include all the possibilities for this. Thanks, Tom >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Larry Woodman" <lwoodman@redhat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>, "Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:15:23 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <0a4fd80a-c3ec-5cb3-6996-bb1562c1bf58@amd.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20161114171523.rcqxdADku1wJ9T_CCP0f7zRCX-__wREvOR1_YgslEps@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20161110105114.oiwcgpb436dxrdpb@pd.tnic> On 11/10/2016 4:51 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:34:39PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> This patch adds a Documenation entry to decribe the AMD Secure Memory >> Encryption (SME) feature. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> >> --- >> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++ >> Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> index 030e9e9..4c730b0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt >> @@ -2282,6 +2282,11 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted. >> memory contents and reserves bad memory >> regions that are detected. >> >> + mem_encrypt= [X86-64] Enable AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) >> + Memory encryption is disabled by default, using this >> + switch, memory encryption can be enabled. > > I'd say here: > > "Force-enable memory encryption if it is disabled in the > BIOS." Good suggestion, that will make this clearer. > >> + on: enable memory encryption >> + >> meye.*= [HW] Set MotionEye Camera parameters >> See Documentation/video4linux/meye.txt. >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..788d871 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ >> +Secure Memory Encryption (SME) is a feature found on AMD processors. >> + >> +SME provides the ability to mark individual pages of memory as encrypted using >> +the standard x86 page tables. A page that is marked encrypted will be >> +automatically decrypted when read from DRAM and encrypted when written to >> +DRAM. SME can therefore be used to protect the contents of DRAM from physical >> +attacks on the system. >> + >> +A page is encrypted when a page table entry has the encryption bit set (see >> +below how to determine the position of the bit). The encryption bit can be >> +specified in the cr3 register, allowing the PGD table to be encrypted. Each >> +successive level of page tables can also be encrypted. >> + >> +Support for SME can be determined through the CPUID instruction. The CPUID >> +function 0x8000001f reports information related to SME: >> + >> + 0x8000001f[eax]: >> + Bit[0] indicates support for SME >> + 0x8000001f[ebx]: >> + Bit[5:0] pagetable bit number used to enable memory encryption >> + Bit[11:6] reduction in physical address space, in bits, when >> + memory encryption is enabled (this only affects system >> + physical addresses, not guest physical addresses) >> + >> +If support for SME is present, MSR 0xc00100010 (SYS_CFG) can be used to >> +determine if SME is enabled and/or to enable memory encryption: >> + >> + 0xc0010010: >> + Bit[23] 0 = memory encryption features are disabled >> + 1 = memory encryption features are enabled >> + >> +Linux relies on BIOS to set this bit if BIOS has determined that the reduction >> +in the physical address space as a result of enabling memory encryption (see >> +CPUID information above) will not conflict with the address space resource >> +requirements for the system. If this bit is not set upon Linux startup then >> +Linux itself will not set it and memory encryption will not be possible. >> + >> +SME support is configurable through the AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT config option. >> +Additionally, the mem_encrypt=on command line parameter is required to activate >> +memory encryption. > > So how am I to understand this? We won't have TSME or we will but it > will be off by default and users will have to enable it in the BIOS or > will have to boot with mem_encrypt=on...? > > Can you please expand on all the possible options there would be > available to users? Yup, I'll try to expand on the documentation to include all the possibilities for this. Thanks, Tom >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 17:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-11-10 0:34 [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-10 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-14 17:15 ` Tom Lendacky [this message] 2016-11-14 17:15 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-10 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-11 1:26 ` Kani, Toshimitsu 2016-11-11 1:26 ` Kani, Toshimitsu [not found] ` <1478827480.20881.142.camel-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-14 16:51 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 16:51 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003610.3280.22043.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-16 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-16 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161116104656.qz5wp33zzyja373r-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-16 19:22 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-16 19:22 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/20] x86: Insure that boot memory areas are mapped properly Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003620.3280.20613.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-17 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-17 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-19 18:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-19 18:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 14:39 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-11-15 14:39 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-11-15 17:02 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 17:02 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <d5ebd13d-1278-8714-3f03-8ee7f04a2b38-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 18:17 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-11-15 18:17 ` Radim Krčmář 2016-11-15 20:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 20:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-15 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [not found] ` <20161115171443-mutt-send-email-mst-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 18:29 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 18:29 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 19:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-15 19:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-22 11:38 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-22 11:38 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-22 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-22 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-22 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-22 15:41 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161122154137.z5vp3xcl5cpesuiz-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-22 20:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-22 20:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2016-11-10 0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-22 19:25 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-22 19:25 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161122192526.vg63jjhwsbjwex7i-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-29 18:00 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-29 18:00 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003426.3280.2999.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-10 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:34 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-11 11:53 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-11 11:53 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-10 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003513.3280.12104.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 12:10 ` Joerg Roedel 2016-11-15 12:10 ` Joerg Roedel 2016-11-15 12:14 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 12:14 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 14:40 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 14:40 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <a4cc5b07-89e1-aaa0-1977-1de95883ba62-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161115153338.a2cxmatnpqcgiaiy-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 16:06 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 16:06 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161115121456.f4slpk4i2jl3e2ke-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 21:22 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 21:22 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 21:33 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 21:33 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-15 22:01 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 22:01 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161115121035.GD24857-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-15 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-15 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/20] x86: Add Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/20] x86: Add support to enable SME during early boot processing Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:35 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003543.3280.99623.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-14 17:29 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-14 17:29 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-14 18:18 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 18:18 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 20:01 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-14 20:01 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-10 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/20] Add support to access boot related data in the clear Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-11 16:17 ` Kani, Toshimitsu 2016-11-11 16:17 ` Kani, Toshimitsu [not found] ` <1478880929.20881.148.camel-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-14 16:24 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 16:24 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-17 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-17 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161117155543.vg3domfqm3bhp4f7-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-19 18:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-19 18:33 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-20 23:04 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-20 23:04 ` Borislav Petkov [not found] ` <20161110003631.3280.73292.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-12-07 13:19 ` Matt Fleming 2016-12-07 13:19 ` Matt Fleming 2016-12-09 14:26 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-12-09 14:26 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:36 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003655.3280.57333.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-17 17:39 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-17 17:39 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-19 18:48 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-19 18:48 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <6f1a16e4-5a84-20c0-4bd3-3be5ed933800-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-21 8:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-21 8:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-10 0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003708.3280.29934.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-17 18:09 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-17 18:09 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-19 18:50 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-19 18:50 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/20] iommu/amd: Disable AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 16:32 ` Joerg Roedel 2016-11-14 16:32 ` Joerg Roedel 2016-11-14 16:48 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-14 16:48 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for video mappings Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003826.3280.5546.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-24 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-24 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-29 18:40 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-29 18:40 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/20] " Tom Lendacky 2016-11-10 0:38 ` Tom Lendacky [not found] ` <20161110003838.3280.23327.stgit-qCXWGYdRb2BnqfbPTmsdiZQ+2ll4COg0XqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> 2016-11-22 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-22 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-26 20:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-26 20:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-29 18:48 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-29 18:48 ` Tom Lendacky 2016-11-29 19:56 ` Borislav Petkov 2016-11-29 19:56 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=0a4fd80a-c3ec-5cb3-6996-bb1562c1bf58@amd.com \ --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \ --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).