From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:15:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F01E10.6030909@mellanox.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160321161512.-JRJKAkZfWlx6LhLwLp0JGDu4Snb-yyaG-unh5gevVo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160321154201.GA6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 03/21/2016 11:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:02:13PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> index 9f7c21c22477..d569ae7fde37 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle(void)
>> /*
>> * We use this if we don't have any better idle routine..
>> */
>> -void default_idle(void)
>> +void __cpuidle default_idle(void)
>> {
>> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id());
>> safe_halt();
>> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> * with interrupts enabled and no flags, which is backwards compatible with the
>> * original MWAIT implementation.
>> */
>> -static void mwait_idle(void)
>> +static __cpuidle void mwait_idle(void)
>> {
>> if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
>> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(1, smp_processor_id());
> The most common idle function for x86 is: mwait_idle_with_hints(),
> trouble is, its an inline, so I'm not sure adding __cpuidle to it does
> anything.
No, you're right, it wouldn't help. I didn't look at the drivers/cpuidle
subsystem at all in my patch, since I'm not that familiar with it,
but it seems like tagging acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(), as the
only user of mwait_idle_with_hints(), will do the job.
I do see that native_play_dead() also uses mwait/monitor, but since
that's hotplug I don't think it's relevant to this patch series.
> I've yet to find the magic objdump incantation to check. Or rather
> objdump -h doesn't appear to list .cpuidle.text at all :/
>
> I'm probably doing something silly...
The easiest way to check for a given function is just to look
at the "nm -n" output and see that all the functions you expect
to reflect idle behavior are in the cpuidle begin/end range.
Or, to look at "objdump -dr" and search for monitor/mwait.
objdump -h certainly works to show .cpuidle.text if you look at
individual objects (e.g. arch/x86/kernel/process.o) but by the time
you're looking at the linked vmlinux image they have all been linked
into the giant .text section.
--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160307204317.GR6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2016-03-16 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code Chris Metcalf
2016-03-16 17:02 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-16 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus Chris Metcalf
2016-03-16 17:02 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-16 18:46 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-16 18:46 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-21 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 15:46 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-21 15:46 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-21 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 16:15 ` Chris Metcalf [this message]
2016-03-21 16:15 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-21 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 17:12 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-21 17:12 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-21 17:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-21 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-22 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code Chris Metcalf
2016-03-22 17:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-22 17:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus Chris Metcalf
2016-03-22 17:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-22 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-22 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-22 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-22 22:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-23 0:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-23 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] improvements to the nmi_backtrace code Chris Metcalf
2016-03-30 17:16 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle cpus Chris Metcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F01E10.6030909@mellanox.com \
--to=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).