linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Adin Scannell <ascannell@google.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] minor mmu_gather patches
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:42:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824094220.3ac18168@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180823234220.OsPmM2IPZpQ70p55rllKb4ruW34o2GC-MArzYHubsmI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823232704.GA4487@brain-police>

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:27:05 +0100
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> Hi Linus,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:37:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:15 PM Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:  
> > >
> > > So right now my "tlb-fixes" branch looks like this:
> > > [..]
> > >
> > > I'll do a few more test builds and boots, but I think I'm going to
> > > merge it in this cleaned-up and re-ordered form.  
> > 
> > In the meantime, I decided to push out that branch in case anybody
> > wants to look at it.
> > 
> > I may rebase it if I - or anybody else - find anything bad there, so
> > consider it non-stable, but I think it's in its final shape modulo
> > issues.  
> 
> Unfortunately, that branch doesn't build for arm64 because of Nick's patch
> moving tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() into tlb.h (which I acked!). It's a static
> inline which calls tlb_flush(), which in our case is also a static inline
> but one that is defined in our asm/tlb.h after including asm-generic/tlb.h.
> 
> Ah, just noticed you've pushed this to master! Please could you take the
> arm64 patch below on top, in order to fix the build?

Sorry yeah I had the sign offs but should have clear I hadn't fully
build tested them. It's reasonable for reviewers to assume basic
diligence was done and concentrate on the logic rather than build
trivialities. So that's my bad. Thanks for the fix.

Thanks,
Nick

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Will
> 
> --->8  
> 
> From 48ea452db90a91ff2b62a94277daf565e715a126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:23:04 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: tlb: Provide forward declaration of tlb_flush() before
>  including tlb.h
> 
> As of commit fd1102f0aade ("mm: mmu_notifier fix for tlb_end_vma"),
> asm-generic/tlb.h now calls tlb_flush() from a static inline function,
> so we need to make sure that it's declared before #including the
> asm-generic header in the arch header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> index 0ad1cf233470..a3233167be60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline void __tlb_remove_table(void *_table)
>  #define tlb_remove_entry(tlb, entry)	tlb_remove_page(tlb, entry)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>  
> +static void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
> +
>  #include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
>  
>  static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-23  8:47 [RFC PATCH 0/2] minor mmu_gather patches Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23  8:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23  8:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: move tlb_table_flush to tlb_flush_mmu_free Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23  8:47   ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 13:40   ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 13:40     ` Will Deacon
2018-09-06 20:29   ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-06 20:29     ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-07 13:44     ` Will Deacon
2018-09-07 13:44       ` Will Deacon
2018-09-07 14:28       ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-07 14:28         ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-23  8:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: mmu_notifier fix for tlb_end_vma Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23  8:47   ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 12:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-23 12:46     ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-23 13:41   ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 13:41     ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:07   ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: mmu_notifier fix for tlb_end_vma (build failures) Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 13:07     ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 13:10     ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:10       ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:24       ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 13:24         ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 13:34         ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:34           ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:50           ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:50             ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 13:54             ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 13:54               ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 14:06             ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 14:06               ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 14:25               ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 14:25                 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 18:22                 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 18:22                   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-24 23:32             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-24 23:32               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-23 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] minor mmu_gather patches Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 19:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 19:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 19:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 23:27     ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 23:27       ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 23:42       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-08-23 23:42         ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 23:35   ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 23:35     ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-24  8:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24  8:05     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824094220.3ac18168@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ascannell@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).