linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:30:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0HQUqtL=9pgPEreQJaA0AksiR06B4oAwvbYnJeA-2i7w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704241908260.32200@eddie.linux-mips.org>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>>
>> So it still fails, but only because of one compiler error that I can avoid by
>> disabling that driver, and you probably use a slightly patched compiler
>> version that doesn't have this particular bug, or it was a regression between
>> gcc-4.1.2 and 4.1.3.
>
>  Umm, I didn't build modules, sorry, because I don't usually use them with
> those systems.  However I have completed this step now and it also worked
> just fine:
>
> $ ls -la crypto/drbg.o
> -rw-r--r--  1 macro macro 14096 Apr 24 18:59 crypto/drbg.o
> $ file crypto/drbg.o
> crypto/drbg.o: ELF 32-bit LSB MIPS-I relocatable, MIPS, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
> $
>
> so you are likely right that either I have a patch applied to my 4.1.2
> build that has somehow fixed the ICE or it is a 4.1.3 regression (or a bad
> patch in your 4.1.3 build).

Ok.

>  BTW I do see these `may be used uninitialized' warnings just as Geert
> does and even have a local patch, which I have neglected to submit, for a
> 64-bit configuration (`decstation_defconfig' is 32-bit) where in a single
> place -Werror turns it into a build failure.  I do not consider it a big
> issue though, and might even wrap that patch up and submit sometime.

I'd recommend dropping that -Werror from mips and the other few
architectures that have it, or maybe wrapping it in a Kconfig symbol that
is disabled by default. It would also take care of
==> build/mips/bmips_be_defconfig/log <==
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/git/arm-soc/arch/mips/bmips/setup.c:37: error: integer constant is
too large for 'long' type

As mentioned, we can also turn off the warnings by default and let
Geert turn them on again:

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 779302695453..2528f60fb9ab 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -647,8 +647,10 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
 endif
 endif

-KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
-                                  $(call
cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, \
+                                 $(call cc-disable-warning,uninitialized, \
+                                 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
+                                 $(call
cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))))

 # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)


I've built the remaining defconfigs in the meantime (linux-4.11-rc8, gcc-4.1.3,
ARCH=mips) and got 38 builds with warnings and 20 failed builds. There are
at least six different build failures and only one ICE among them (only
in decstation_defconfig). With gcc-4.3 this is only slightly better: 18
failed build, 20 with warnings and 20 without warnings.

With linux-4.3, I saw this failure on 32 defconfigs,
and you fixed that in linux-4.7 with e49d38488515 ("MIPS: MSA: Fix a
link error on `_init_msa_upper' with older GCC"):

arch/mips/built-in.o: In function `enable_restore_fp_context':
traps.c:(.text+0xbefc): undefined reference to `_init_msa_upper'
traps.c:(.text+0xbfc0): undefined reference to `_init_msa_upper'

With gcc-4.9, all mips defconfigs now build without warnings.

For the other architectures in linux-4.11-rc8 can actually build with
sparc-gcc-4.1, afaict this was a bug that impacted all compilers up to
gcc-4.7 and a workaround was added recently. In turn, parisc-gcc-4.1
no longer works on linux-4.11, so we still have only three architectures
that can build their 'defconfig' with the old compiler, plus the majority
of the mips config files.

So while overall I still think that gcc-4.1 is rather broken, it seems that
you have it well under control on both mips and m68k. It's possible
that some other people use patched gcc-4.1 or only build special
configurations on further architectures that I found to be broken
with vanilla toolchains and the regular defconfig.

How about this approach then:

- To keep it simple, we update the README.rst to say that a minimum
  gcc-4.3 is required, while recommending gcc-4.9 for all architectures
- Support for gcc-4.0 and earlier gets removed from linux/compiler.h,
  and instead we add a summary of what I found, explaining that
  gcc-4.1 has active users on a few architectures.
- We make the Makefile show a warning once during compilation for
  gcc earlier than 4.3.

        Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-24 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-16 10:56 [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 01/13] [HACK] gcc-4.5: avoid link errors for unused function pointers Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: arm: fix gcc-4.5 build Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-04 10:38   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-04 10:38     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 03/13] ARM: div64: fix building with gcc-4.5 and lower Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 04/13] vfio-pci: use 32-bit comparisons for register address for gcc-4.5 Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 15:30   ` Alex Williamson
2016-12-16 19:50     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 05/13] clk: pxa: fix gcc-4.4 build Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 06/13] ARM: atomic: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 07/13] watchdog: kempld: fix gcc-4.3 build Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 08/13] arm/arm64: xen: avoid gcc-4.4 warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 09/13] ARM: mark cmpxchg and xchg __always_inline for gcc-4.3 Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 10/13] asm-generic: mark cmpxchg as " Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 11/13] fs: fix unsigned enum warning with gcc-4.2 Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-03 22:47   ` Brendan Gregg
2017-02-28 21:53     ` Brendan Gregg
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm: avoid binary number literals for gcc-4.2 Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-04 10:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-04 10:39     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-12-16 10:56 ` [PATCH 13/13] ARM: avoid 'Q' asm constraint for gcc-4.1 and earlier Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 10:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 11:14 ` [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 11:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-16 19:52   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-20 10:15     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-20 19:52       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-20 19:52         ` Kees Cook
2017-04-21 20:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-21 20:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-21 21:05           ` Kees Cook
2017-04-21 21:05             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-22  3:10             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-22  3:10               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-22 15:30               ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-22 15:30                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-23 20:13                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-23 20:13                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-24  9:44                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-24  9:44                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-24 10:17                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-24 10:17                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-24 14:13                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-24 16:53                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 17:29                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-04-24 18:16                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-24 18:16                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-24 18:30                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 18:30                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-04-24 20:30                           ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2017-04-24 20:52                             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-25  7:06                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-25  7:06                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-25  9:22     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-25  9:22       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-12-16 15:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-12-16 15:54   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-12-16 19:58   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 19:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 20:34     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-12-16 20:34       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-12-16 17:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-16 22:00   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-16 22:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-17 11:29     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-17 11:29       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-01-02 12:23       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-02 12:23         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-12-20  9:59     ` Heiko Carstens
2016-12-20  9:59       ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a0HQUqtL=9pgPEreQJaA0AksiR06B4oAwvbYnJeA-2i7w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).