From: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 19:08:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04ab9271-db3c-e6b5-2464-12cb8662bb33@marcan.st> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302101211.2328-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for
> the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
> I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also
> tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1.
Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey
if you use a swap file [1].
I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but
it's worth pointing out for other people who might test this.
Modulo that,
Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/
--
Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 10:12 [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 1/8] ARM: ep93xx: Select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER directly Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 2/8] irqchip: Do not blindly select CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 3/8] genirq: Allow architectures to override set_handle_irq() fallback Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 4/8] arm64: don't use GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 5/8] arm64: irq: rework root IRQ handler registration Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 6/8] arm64: entry: factor irq triage logic into macros Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 7/8] arm64: Always keep DAIF.[IF] in sync Mark Rutland
2021-03-02 10:12 ` [PATCHv2 8/8] arm64: irq: allow FIQs to be handled Mark Rutland
2021-03-05 10:08 ` Hector Martin [this message]
2021-03-08 17:52 ` [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration Mark Rutland
2021-03-08 20:20 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04ab9271-db3c-e6b5-2464-12cb8662bb33@marcan.st \
--to=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).