Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ PATCH v4 3/4] cpufreq: Add Tegra194 cpufreq driver

[Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>]

> 
> On 26-06-20, 21:13, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> +static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +     struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data;
>> +     struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp;
>> +     int err, i;
>> +
>> +     data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!data)
>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +     data->num_clusters = MAX_CLUSTERS;
>> +     data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->num_clusters,
>> +                                 sizeof(*data->tables), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!data->tables)
>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>> +
>> +     bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev);
>> +     if (IS_ERR(bpmp))
>> +             return PTR_ERR(bpmp);
>> +
>> +     read_counters_wq = alloc_workqueue("read_counters_wq", __WQ_LEGACY, 1);
>> +     if (!read_counters_wq) {
>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to create_workqueue\n");
>> +             err = -EINVAL;
>> +             goto put_bpmp;
> 
> This will call destroy_workqueue() eventually and it will crash your
> kernel.
> 
> Apart from this, this stuff looks okay. Don't resend the patch just
> yet (and if required, send only this patch using --in-reply-to flag
> for git send email). Lets wait for an Ack from Rob for the first two
> patches.
> 
Sorry for the delayed response as i was on PTO.
Thank you for the feedback.

Have posted a v5 based on v4 patch set.

>> +     }
>> +
> 
> --
> viresh
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel