linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vincent.guittot@linaro.org (Vincent Guittot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:44:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397209481-28542-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397209481-28542-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

A new flag SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN is created to reflect whether groups of CPUs
in a sched_domain level can or not reach different power state. As an example,
the flag should be cleared at CPU level if groups of cores can be power gated
independently. This information can be used in the load balance decision or to
add load balancing level between group of CPUs that can power gate
independantly.
This flag is part of the topology flags that can be set by arch.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |  1 +
 kernel/sched/core.c   | 10 +++++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 7df3ca2..18464cb 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -865,6 +865,7 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
 #define SD_BALANCE_WAKE		0x0010  /* Balance on wakeup */
 #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE		0x0020	/* Wake task to waking CPU */
 #define SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER	0x0080	/* Domain members share cpu power */
+#define SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN	0x0100	/* Domain members share power domain */
 #define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES	0x0200	/* Domain members share cpu pkg resources */
 #define SD_SERIALIZE		0x0400	/* Only a single load balancing instance */
 #define SD_ASYM_PACKING		0x0800  /* Place busy groups earlier in the domain */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3743a6c..a30b0b4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5295,7 +5295,8 @@ static int sd_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd)
 			 SD_BALANCE_FORK |
 			 SD_BALANCE_EXEC |
 			 SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER |
-			 SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
+			 SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
+			 SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)) {
 		if (sd->groups != sd->groups->next)
 			return 0;
 	}
@@ -5326,7 +5327,8 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
 				SD_BALANCE_EXEC |
 				SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER |
 				SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |
-				SD_PREFER_SIBLING);
+				SD_PREFER_SIBLING |
+				SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN);
 		if (nr_node_ids == 1)
 			pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
 	}
@@ -5935,6 +5937,7 @@ static int sched_domains_curr_level;
  * SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER      - describes SMT topologies
  * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches
  * SD_NUMA                - describes NUMA topologies
+ * SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN   - describes shared power domain
  *
  * Odd one out:
  * SD_ASYM_PACKING        - describes SMT quirks
@@ -5943,7 +5946,8 @@ static int sched_domains_curr_level;
 	(SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER |		\
 	 SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES |	\
 	 SD_NUMA |			\
-	 SD_ASYM_PACKING)
+	 SD_ASYM_PACKING |		\
+	 SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN)
 
 static struct sched_domain *
 sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11  9:44 [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34     ` [PATCH] fix: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34     ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: powerpc: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2014-04-18 10:58   ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:54     ` [PATCH] fix: sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54     ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11  9:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 11:46   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 14:46     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 15:26       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-24  7:30         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-24 12:48           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25  7:45             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-25 15:55               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 16:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:05                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-12 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-14  7:29   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-15  7:53   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1397209481-28542-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).