linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm
@ 2015-03-09  2:31 Joseph Lo
  2015-03-11  8:34 ` Thierry Reding
  2015-03-11 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Lo @ 2015-03-09  2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Expending the usage for both Tegra & Tegra64 SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c | 31 +------------------------------
 drivers/soc/tegra/common.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
index 914341bcef25..95df6a97b956 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
@@ -87,36 +87,7 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_irq(void)
 
 static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
 {
-	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
-	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
-	struct device *parent = NULL;
-
-	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!soc_dev_attr)
-		goto out;
-
-	soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Tegra");
-	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d",
-					   tegra_sku_info.revision);
-	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%u", tegra_get_chip_id());
-
-	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
-	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
-		kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
-		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
-		kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
-		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev);
-
-	/*
-	 * Finished with the static registrations now; fill in the missing
-	 * devices
-	 */
-out:
-	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, parent);
+	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 static void __init paz00_init(void)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/common.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/common.c
index a71cb74f3674..caf7d375eeae 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/common.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/common.c
@@ -7,8 +7,11 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
 
 #include <soc/tegra/common.h>
+#include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
 
 static const struct of_device_id tegra_machine_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20", },
@@ -28,3 +31,33 @@ bool soc_is_tegra(void)
 
 	return of_match_node(tegra_machine_match, root) != NULL;
 }
+
+static int __init tegra_soc_init(void)
+{
+	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
+	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
+
+	if (!soc_is_tegra())
+		return 0;
+
+	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!soc_dev_attr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Tegra");
+	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d",
+					   tegra_sku_info.revision);
+	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%u", tegra_get_chip_id());
+
+	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
+	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
+		kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
+		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
+		kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
+		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+device_initcall(tegra_soc_init);
-- 
2.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm
  2015-03-09  2:31 [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm Joseph Lo
@ 2015-03-11  8:34 ` Thierry Reding
  2015-03-12  0:40   ` Joseph Lo
  2015-03-11 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2015-03-11  8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:31:41AM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> Expending the usage for both Tegra & Tegra64 SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c | 31 +------------------------------
>  drivers/soc/tegra/common.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> index 914341bcef25..95df6a97b956 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> @@ -87,36 +87,7 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_irq(void)
>  
>  static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
>  {
> -	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> -	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> -	struct device *parent = NULL;
> -
> -	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!soc_dev_attr)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Tegra");
> -	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d",
> -					   tegra_sku_info.revision);
> -	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%u", tegra_get_chip_id());
> -
> -	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> -	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Finished with the static registrations now; fill in the missing
> -	 * devices
> -	 */
> -out:
> -	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, parent);
> +	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);

One of the reasons for adding the soc_device in the first place was so
that it would be possible to use it as the parent for all devices that
are instantiated from device tree. You remove that here, and break the
ABI in the process. Arguably no userspace should be relying on the exact
path in sysfs, but I'd still like to keep the top-level parent.

Which reminds me of a discussion a while back about introducing a top-
level driver for the SoC. I'm not sure if anything came of that.

Stephen, do you know if there was a conclusion on that discussion? As
far as I remember this sparked around the time when we moved drivers to
drivers/soc and started splitting things up into initcalls. I'm thinking
that if nothing like that was created yet, perhaps soc_device and
soc_bus_type would be good candidates to implement this on top of.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150311/2a5fc161/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm
  2015-03-09  2:31 [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm Joseph Lo
  2015-03-11  8:34 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2015-03-11 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2015-03-12  0:35   ` Joseph Lo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2015-03-11 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:31:41AM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> Expending the usage for both Tegra & Tegra64 SoCs.
Expanding? Mabe better: Moving this code to drivers/soc/tegra allows the
aarch64 SoCs to use it, too.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm
  2015-03-11 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2015-03-12  0:35   ` Joseph Lo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Lo @ 2015-03-12  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Oops, sorry for typo. Thanks, Uwe.

On 03/12/2015 12:22 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:31:41AM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
>> Expending the usage for both Tegra & Tegra64 SoCs.
> Expanding? Mabe better: Moving this code to drivers/soc/tegra allows the
> aarch64 SoCs to use it, too.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm
  2015-03-11  8:34 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2015-03-12  0:40   ` Joseph Lo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Lo @ 2015-03-12  0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 03/11/2015 04:34 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:31:41AM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
>> Expending the usage for both Tegra & Tegra64 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c | 31 +------------------------------
>>   drivers/soc/tegra/common.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
>> index 914341bcef25..95df6a97b956 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
>> @@ -87,36 +87,7 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_irq(void)
>>
>>   static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
>>   {
>> -	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> -	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> -	struct device *parent = NULL;
>> -
>> -	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -	if (!soc_dev_attr)
>> -		goto out;
>> -
>> -	soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Tegra");
>> -	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d",
>> -					   tegra_sku_info.revision);
>> -	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%u", tegra_get_chip_id());
>> -
>> -	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
>> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
>> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
>> -		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev);
>> -
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Finished with the static registrations now; fill in the missing
>> -	 * devices
>> -	 */
>> -out:
>> -	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, parent);
>> +	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>
> One of the reasons for adding the soc_device in the first place was so
> that it would be possible to use it as the parent for all devices that
> are instantiated from device tree. You remove that here, and break the
> ABI in the process. Arguably no userspace should be relying on the exact
> path in sysfs, but I'd still like to keep the top-level parent.
>
That would be a problem if you want to keep the same "ABI" in ARM64 kernel.

> Which reminds me of a discussion a while back about introducing a top-
> level driver for the SoC. I'm not sure if anything came of that.
>
> Stephen, do you know if there was a conclusion on that discussion? As
> far as I remember this sparked around the time when we moved drivers to
> drivers/soc and started splitting things up into initcalls. I'm thinking
> that if nothing like that was created yet, perhaps soc_device and
> soc_bus_type would be good candidates to implement this on top of.
>
> Thierry
>
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7F3EB3A1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-12  0:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-09  2:31 [PATCH] soc/tegra: move soc_device_register call out of arch/arm Joseph Lo
2015-03-11  8:34 ` Thierry Reding
2015-03-12  0:40   ` Joseph Lo
2015-03-11 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-12  0:35   ` Joseph Lo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).