linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: danielmicay@gmail.com (Daniel Micay)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: stackprotector: ascii armor the stack canary
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 19:57:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1495238227.1190.1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170519212636.30440-1-riel@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 17:26 -0400, riel at redhat.com wrote:
> Zero out the first byte of the stack canary value on 64 bit systems,
> in order to prevent unterminated C string overflows from being able
> to successfully overwrite the canary, even if an attacker somehow
> guessed or obtained the canary value.
> 
> Inspired by execshield ascii-armor and PaX/grsecurity.
> 
> Thanks to Daniel Micay for extracting code of similar functionality
> from PaX/grsecurity and making it easy to find in his linux-hardened
> git tree on https://github.com/thestinger/linux-hardened/

To clarify something this part isn't from PaX / grsecurity. I marked the
commits from PaX / grsecurity as such in their commit messages and these
are among the ones that aren't from there.

This is from a set of changes that I did for CopperheadOS and forward
ported to mainline recently to start linux-hardened. It was only arm64
for CopperheadOS. The overlap with PaX is that when adding the leading
zero byte for x86, I needed to first fix get_random_int being used for
the per-task canary value. I didn't know PaX fixed it way back in 2007.

I implemented heap canaries for our userspace malloc implementation and
then later did the same thing for slub in the kernel. I added a leading
zero byte to both of those heap canaries later on and then did the SSP
implementation in Bionic and the kernel's arm64 code. I took the idea
from glibc but limited it to 64-bit where there's entropy to spare. The
glibc leading zero might have come from execshield, but I don't know.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-19 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-19 21:26 stackprotector: ascii armor the stack canary riel at redhat.com
2017-05-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] random, stackprotect: introduce get_random_canary function riel at redhat.com
2017-05-24  8:30   ` [PATCH 1/5] random,stackprotect: " Ingo Molnar
2017-05-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] fork, random: use get_random_canary to set tsk->stack_canary riel at redhat.com
2017-05-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: ascii armor the x86_64 boot init stack canary riel at redhat.com
2017-05-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: ascii armor the arm64 " riel at redhat.com
2017-05-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] sh64: ascii armor the sh64 " riel at redhat.com
2017-05-19 21:32 ` stackprotector: ascii armor the " Kees Cook
2017-05-24 11:57   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-19 23:57 ` Daniel Micay [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1495238227.1190.1.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=danielmicay@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).