* [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate
@ 2019-05-21 6:44 Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported() Stanley Chu
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Chu @ 2019-05-21 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi, martin.petersen, avri.altman, alim.akhtar, pedrom.sousa
Cc: marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng, chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen,
linux-mediatek, peter.wang, matthias.bgg, Stanley Chu,
linux-arm-kernel, beanhuo
Currently auto-hibernate is activated if host supports
auto-hibern8 capability. However error-handling is not implemented,
which makes the feature somewhat risky.
If either "Hibernate Enter" or "Hibernate Exit" fail during
auto-hibernate flow, the corresponding interrupt
"UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER" or "UIC_HIBERNATE_EXIT" shall be raised
according to UFS specification.
This patch adds auto-hibernate error-handling:
- Monitor "Hibernate Enter" and "Hibernate Exit" interrupts after
auto-hibernate feature is activated.
- If fail happens, trigger error-handling just like "manual-hibernate"
fail and apply the same recovery flow: schedule UFS error handler in
ufshcd_check_errors(), and then do host reset and restore
in UFS error handler.
v5:
- Also re-factor checking of Auto-Hibernation support in other places, e.g., in ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable() and in ufs-sysfs (Avri Altman)
- Change order of patch "scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()" to #1 as a preparation patch of whole series
v4:
- Replace original patch "[3/3] scsi: ufs: Use re-factored Auto-Hibernate function" by a new preparation patch "[2/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()" for re-factoring ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported (Avri Altman)
- Refine UIC mask definitions (Avri Altman)
v3:
- Fix typo in patch "scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer" (Avri Altman)
- Rebase to Linux 5.2-rc1
v2:
- Fix sentences in commit message (Marc Gonzalez)
- Make "Auto-Hibernate" error detection more precise (Bean Huo)
Stanley Chu (3):
scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()
scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer
scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 ++++--
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
@ 2019-05-21 6:44 ` Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer Stanley Chu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Chu @ 2019-05-21 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi, martin.petersen, avri.altman, alim.akhtar, pedrom.sousa
Cc: marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng, chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen,
linux-mediatek, peter.wang, matthias.bgg, Stanley Chu,
linux-arm-kernel, beanhuo
The checking of Auto-Hibernation support is used in
many places in the driver, thus re-factor it as
ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported() to make code more
clean.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
index 8d9332bb7d0c..f478685122ff 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void ufshcd_auto_hibern8_update(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 ahit)
{
unsigned long flags;
- if (!(hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT))
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba))
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static ssize_t auto_hibern8_show(struct device *dev,
{
struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- if (!(hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT))
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", ufshcd_ahit_to_us(hba->ahit));
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static ssize_t auto_hibern8_store(struct device *dev,
struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned int timer;
- if (!(hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT))
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (kstrtouint(buf, 0, &timer))
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 8c1c551f2b42..0cf698d05426 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -3907,7 +3907,7 @@ static void ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
unsigned long flags;
- if (!(hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT) || !hba->ahit)
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba) || !hba->ahit)
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
@@ -8312,7 +8312,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE);
/* Set the default auto-hiberate idle timer value to 150 ms */
- if (hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT) {
+ if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba)) {
hba->ahit = FIELD_PREP(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, 150) |
FIELD_PREP(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_SCALE_MASK, 3);
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index ecfa898b9ccc..994d73d03207 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -740,6 +740,11 @@ return true;
#endif
}
+static inline bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+ return (hba->capabilities & MASK_AUTO_HIBERN8_SUPPORT);
+}
+
#define ufshcd_writel(hba, val, reg) \
writel((val), (hba)->mmio_base + (reg))
#define ufshcd_readl(hba, reg) \
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported() Stanley Chu
@ 2019-05-21 6:44 ` Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Chu @ 2019-05-21 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi, martin.petersen, avri.altman, alim.akhtar, pedrom.sousa
Cc: marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng, chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen,
linux-mediatek, peter.wang, matthias.bgg, Stanley Chu,
linux-arm-kernel, beanhuo
Some vendor-specific initialization flow may set its own
auto-hibernate timer. In this case, do not overwrite timer value
as "default value" in ufshcd_init().
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 0cf698d05426..7cd757558203 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -8312,7 +8312,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE);
/* Set the default auto-hiberate idle timer value to 150 ms */
- if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba)) {
+ if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba) && !hba->ahit) {
hba->ahit = FIELD_PREP(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_TIMER_MASK, 150) |
FIELD_PREP(UFSHCI_AHIBERN8_SCALE_MASK, 3);
}
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported() Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer Stanley Chu
@ 2019-05-21 6:44 ` Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 8:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling " Avri Altman
2019-05-30 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanley Chu @ 2019-05-21 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi, martin.petersen, avri.altman, alim.akhtar, pedrom.sousa
Cc: marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng, chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen,
linux-mediatek, peter.wang, matthias.bgg, Stanley Chu,
linux-arm-kernel, beanhuo
Currently auto-hibernate is activated if host supports
auto-hibern8 capability. However error-handling is not implemented,
which makes the feature somewhat risky.
If either "Hibernate Enter" or "Hibernate Exit" fail during
auto-hibernate flow, the corresponding interrupt
"UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER" or "UIC_HIBERNATE_EXIT" shall be raised
according to UFS specification.
This patch adds auto-hibernate error-handling:
- Monitor "Hibernate Enter" and "Hibernate Exit" interrupts after
auto-hibernate feature is activated.
- If fail happens, trigger error-handling just like "manual-hibernate"
fail and apply the same recovery flow: schedule UFS error handler in
ufshcd_check_errors(), and then do host reset and restore
in UFS error handler.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 7cd757558203..a208589426b1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5254,6 +5254,7 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct *work)
goto skip_err_handling;
}
if ((hba->saved_err & INT_FATAL_ERRORS) ||
+ (hba->saved_err & UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK) ||
((hba->saved_err & UIC_ERROR) &&
(hba->saved_uic_err & (UFSHCD_UIC_DL_PA_INIT_ERROR |
UFSHCD_UIC_DL_NAC_RECEIVED_ERROR |
@@ -5413,6 +5414,23 @@ static void ufshcd_update_uic_error(struct ufs_hba *hba)
__func__, hba->uic_error);
}
+static bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_error(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+ u32 intr_mask)
+{
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!(intr_mask & UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK))
+ return false;
+
+ if (hba->active_uic_cmd &&
+ (hba->active_uic_cmd->command == UIC_CMD_DME_HIBER_ENTER ||
+ hba->active_uic_cmd->command == UIC_CMD_DME_HIBER_EXIT))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/**
* ufshcd_check_errors - Check for errors that need s/w attention
* @hba: per-adapter instance
@@ -5431,6 +5449,15 @@ static void ufshcd_check_errors(struct ufs_hba *hba)
queue_eh_work = true;
}
+ if (hba->errors & UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev,
+ "%s: Auto Hibern8 %s failed - status: 0x%08x, upmcrs: 0x%08x\n",
+ __func__, (hba->errors & UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER) ?
+ "Enter" : "Exit",
+ hba->errors, ufshcd_get_upmcrs(hba));
+ queue_eh_work = true;
+ }
+
if (queue_eh_work) {
/*
* update the transfer error masks to sticky bits, let's do this
@@ -5493,6 +5520,10 @@ static void ufshcd_tmc_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba)
static void ufshcd_sl_intr(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 intr_status)
{
hba->errors = UFSHCD_ERROR_MASK & intr_status;
+
+ if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_error(hba, intr_status))
+ hba->errors |= (UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK & intr_status);
+
if (hba->errors)
ufshcd_check_errors(hba);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
index 6fa889de5ee5..dbb75cd28dc8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
@@ -144,8 +144,10 @@ enum {
#define CONTROLLER_FATAL_ERROR 0x10000
#define SYSTEM_BUS_FATAL_ERROR 0x20000
-#define UFSHCD_UIC_PWR_MASK (UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER |\
- UIC_HIBERNATE_EXIT |\
+#define UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK (UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER |\
+ UIC_HIBERNATE_EXIT)
+
+#define UFSHCD_UIC_PWR_MASK (UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK |\
UIC_POWER_MODE)
#define UFSHCD_UIC_MASK (UIC_COMMAND_COMPL | UFSHCD_UIC_PWR_MASK)
--
2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
@ 2019-05-21 8:41 ` Avri Altman
2019-05-30 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Avri Altman @ 2019-05-21 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanley Chu, linux-scsi, martin.petersen, alim.akhtar, pedrom.sousa
Cc: marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng, chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen,
linux-mediatek, peter.wang, matthias.bgg, linux-arm-kernel,
beanhuo
This series looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Currently auto-hibernate is activated if host supports
> auto-hibern8 capability. However error-handling is not implemented,
> which makes the feature somewhat risky.
>
> If either "Hibernate Enter" or "Hibernate Exit" fail during
> auto-hibernate flow, the corresponding interrupt
> "UIC_HIBERNATE_ENTER" or "UIC_HIBERNATE_EXIT" shall be raised
> according to UFS specification.
>
> This patch adds auto-hibernate error-handling:
>
> - Monitor "Hibernate Enter" and "Hibernate Exit" interrupts after
> auto-hibernate feature is activated.
>
> - If fail happens, trigger error-handling just like "manual-hibernate"
> fail and apply the same recovery flow: schedule UFS error handler in
> ufshcd_check_errors(), and then do host reset and restore
> in UFS error handler.
>
> v5:
> - Also re-factor checking of Auto-Hibernation support in other places, e.g., in
> ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable() and in ufs-sysfs (Avri Altman)
> - Change order of patch "scsi: ufs: Introduce
> ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()" to #1 as a preparation patch of whole
> series
>
> v4:
> - Replace original patch "[3/3] scsi: ufs: Use re-factored Auto-Hibernate
> function" by a new preparation patch "[2/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce
> ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()" for re-factoring
> ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported (Avri Altman)
> - Refine UIC mask definitions (Avri Altman)
>
> v3:
> - Fix typo in patch "scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer" (Avri
> Altman)
> - Rebase to Linux 5.2-rc1
>
> v2:
> - Fix sentences in commit message (Marc Gonzalez)
> - Make "Auto-Hibernate" error detection more precise (Bean Huo)
>
> Stanley Chu (3):
> scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported()
> scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer
> scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 ++++--
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.18.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-05-21 8:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling " Avri Altman
@ 2019-05-30 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2019-05-30 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanley Chu
Cc: linux-scsi, martin.petersen, marc.w.gonzalez, andy.teng,
chun-hung.wu, kuohong.wang, evgreen, avri.altman, linux-mediatek,
peter.wang, alim.akhtar, matthias.bgg, pedrom.sousa,
linux-arm-kernel, beanhuo
Stanley,
> Currently auto-hibernate is activated if host supports auto-hibern8
> capability. However error-handling is not implemented, which makes the
> feature somewhat risky.
Applied to 5.3/scsi-queue, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-30 2:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-21 6:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported() Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Do not overwrite Auto-Hibernate timer Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 6:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add error-handling of Auto-Hibernate Stanley Chu
2019-05-21 8:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add error handling " Avri Altman
2019-05-30 2:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).