linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler()
@ 2019-10-09  9:27 wangxu
  2019-10-11 16:43 ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: wangxu @ 2019-10-09  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: will, mark.rutland, linux, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

From: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>

In perf_event_alloc(), event->overflow_handler is initialized to a
non-null value, which makes enable_single_step(bp, addr) in
breakpoint_handler() never be executed.

As a matter of fact, the branch condition has been updated to
is_default_overflow_handler().

Signed-off-by: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index b0c195e..586a587 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			info->trigger = addr;
 			pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
 			perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
-			if (!bp->overflow_handler)
+			if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 				enable_single_step(bp, addr);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
-- 
1.8.5.6


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler()
  2019-10-09  9:27 [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler() wangxu
@ 2019-10-11 16:43 ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-10-11 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wangxu; +Cc: mark.rutland, linux, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 05:27:00PM +0800, wangxu wrote:
> From: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>
> 
> In perf_event_alloc(), event->overflow_handler is initialized to a
> non-null value, which makes enable_single_step(bp, addr) in
> breakpoint_handler() never be executed.
> 
> As a matter of fact, the branch condition has been updated to
> is_default_overflow_handler().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index b0c195e..586a587 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  			info->trigger = addr;
>  			pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
>  			perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
> -			if (!bp->overflow_handler)
> +			if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
>  				enable_single_step(bp, addr);
>  			goto unlock;

Seems to match what we do on arm64, so:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

You'll need to put this into rmk's patch system [1].

Will

[1] https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler()
@ 2019-10-12  3:28 wangxu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wangxu @ 2019-10-12  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

From: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>

In perf_event_alloc(), event->overflow_handler is initialized to a
non-null value, which makes enable_single_step(bp, addr) in
breakpoint_handler() never be executed.

As a matter of fact, the branch condition has been updated to
is_default_overflow_handler().

Signed-off-by: Wang Xu <wangxu72@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index b0c195e..586a587 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			info->trigger = addr;
 			pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
 			perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
-			if (!bp->overflow_handler)
+			if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
 				enable_single_step(bp, addr);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
-- 
1.8.5.6


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-12  3:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-09  9:27 [PATCH] ARM/hw_breakpoint: modify dead code for breakpoint_handler() wangxu
2019-10-11 16:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-12  3:28 wangxu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).