linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (17 more replies)
  0 siblings, 18 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

Hi,

This series improves function return address protection for the arm64 kernel, by
compiling the kernel with ARMv8.3 Pointer Authentication instructions (referred
ptrauth hereafter). This should help protect the kernel against attacks using
return-oriented programming.

Changes since v6 [1]:
 - Dropped patch "arm64: create macro to park cpu in an infinite loop" as this
   clean up patch is not relevant for this series.
 - Fixed backtrace when Function graph tracer is used as pointed by James.
 - Added DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS config dependency as pointed by James.
 - Several minor comments from Vincenzo.
 - Added Reviewed-bys from James and Vincenzo.
 - Rebased the patch series to v5.6-rc5.

Changes since v5 [2]:
 - Added a new patch(arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability..) to move cpucapability
   type helpers in cpufeature.c file. This makes adding new cpucapability easier.
 - Moved kernel key restore to function __cpu_setup(proc.S) as suggested by Catalin.
 - More comments for as-option Kconfig option for concerns raised by Masahiro.
 - Clarified comments for -march=armv8.3-a non-integrated assembler option.

Some additional work not implemented below will be taken up separately:
 - kdump tools may need some rework to work with ptrauth. The kdump
   tools may need the ptrauth information to strip PAC bits. This will
   be sent in a separate patch.
 - Few more ptrauth generic lkdtm tests as requested by Kees Cook.
 - Generate compile time warnings if requested Kconfig feature not 
   supported by compilers.
 - KVM host will now need just APIA key to be saved and restored. Userpace
   should also behave according to it. More details here [3].

This complete series can be found at (git://linux-arm.org/linux-ak.git PAC_mainline_v7)
for reference.

Patch 5 in this series "arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup" will
have minor conflict with Ionela's commit "87a1f063464afd9 (arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to
AMU counters from EL0)" in -next.

Feedback welcome!

Thanks,
Amit Daniel

[1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-March/716268.html
[2]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-February/711699.html
[3]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-March/717847.html


Amit Daniel Kachhap (8):
  arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check
  arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup
  arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file
  arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task
  arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address
  arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk
  arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys
  lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication

Kristina Martsenko (7):
  arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities
  arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific
  arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time
  arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability
  arm64: enable ptrauth earlier
  arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys
  arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing

Mark Rutland (1):
  arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses

Vincenzo Frascino (1):
  kconfig: Add support for 'as-option'

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                        | 31 ++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/Makefile                       | 11 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h         | 24 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h          |  4 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h       | 39 +++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h     | 50 ++++++++---------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h        |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h              | 12 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h   |  5 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c           | 16 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c            | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S                 |  6 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/head.S                  |  2 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c          |  7 +--
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c               |  5 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c                | 16 +++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S                 |  2 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   |  8 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c            |  5 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S                      | 71 +++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c                 | 36 ++++++++++++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c                 |  1 +
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h                |  1 +
 include/linux/stackprotector.h            |  2 +-
 scripts/Kconfig.include                   |  6 ++
 26 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h

-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

Some existing/future meta cpucaps match need the presence of individual
cpucaps. Currently the individual cpucaps checks it via an array based
flag and this introduces dependency on the array entry order.
This limitation exists only for system scope cpufeature.

This patch introduces an internal helper function (__system_matches_cap)
to invoke the matching handler for system scope. This helper has to be
used during a narrow window when,
- The system wide safe registers are set with all the SMP CPUs and,
- The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set.

Normal users should use the existing cpus_have_{const_}cap() global
function.

Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 * Added description for __system_matches_cap.


 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 0b67156..4f2e95e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused)
 
 static void cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap);
 
+static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n);
+
 /*
  * NOTE: Any changes to the visibility of features should be kept in
  * sync with the documentation of the CPU feature register ABI.
@@ -2146,6 +2148,23 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n)
 	return false;
 }
 
+/*
+ * This helper function is used in a narrow window when,
+ * - The system wide safe registers are set with all the SMP CPUs and,
+ * - The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set.
+ * In all other cases cpus_have_{const_}cap() should be used.
+ */
+static bool __system_matches_cap(unsigned int n)
+{
+	if (n < ARM64_NCAPS) {
+		const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap = cpu_hwcaps_ptrs[n];
+
+		if (cap)
+			return cap->matches(cap, SCOPE_SYSTEM);
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 void cpu_set_feature(unsigned int num)
 {
 	WARN_ON(num >= MAX_CPU_FEATURES);
@@ -2218,7 +2237,7 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void)
 static bool __maybe_unused
 cpufeature_pan_not_uao(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int __unused)
 {
-	return (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_PAN) && !cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_UAO));
+	return (__system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_PAN) && !__system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_UAO));
 }
 
 static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cnp(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 02/17] arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

To enable pointer auth for the kernel, we're going to need to check for
the presence of address auth and generic auth using alternative_if. We
currently have two cpucaps for each, but alternative_if needs to check a
single cpucap. So define meta-capabilities that are present when either
of the current two capabilities is present.

Leave the existing four cpucaps in place, as they are still needed to
check for mismatched systems where one CPU has the architected algorithm
but another has the IMP DEF algorithm.

Note, the meta-capabilities were present before but were removed in
commit a56005d32105 ("arm64: cpufeature: Reduce number of pointer auth
CPU caps from 6 to 4") and commit 1e013d06120c ("arm64: cpufeature: Rework
ptr auth hwcaps using multi_entry_cap_matches"), as they were not needed
then. Note, unlike before, the current patch checks the cpucap values
directly, instead of reading the CPU ID register value.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: commit message and macro rebase, use __system_matches_cap]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h    |  4 +++-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  6 ++----
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
index 865e025..72e4e05 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
@@ -58,7 +58,9 @@
 #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT_NVHE	48
 #define ARM64_HAS_E0PD				49
 #define ARM64_HAS_RNG				50
+#define ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH			51
+#define ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH			52
 
-#define ARM64_NCAPS				51
+#define ARM64_NCAPS				53
 
 #endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 2a746b9..0fd1feb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -590,15 +590,13 @@ static __always_inline bool system_supports_cnp(void)
 static inline bool system_supports_address_auth(void)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH) &&
-		(cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_ARCH) ||
-		 cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_IMP_DEF));
+		cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH);
 }
 
 static inline bool system_supports_generic_auth(void)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH) &&
-		(cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) ||
-		 cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_IMP_DEF));
+		cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH);
 }
 
 static inline bool system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 4f2e95e..01f50f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1323,6 +1323,20 @@ static void cpu_enable_address_auth(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
 	sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, 0, SCTLR_ELx_ENIA | SCTLR_ELx_ENIB |
 				       SCTLR_ELx_ENDA | SCTLR_ELx_ENDB);
 }
+
+static bool has_address_auth(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
+			     int __unused)
+{
+	return __system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_ARCH) ||
+	       __system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_IMP_DEF);
+}
+
+static bool has_generic_auth(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
+			     int __unused)
+{
+	return __system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) ||
+	       __system_matches_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_IMP_DEF);
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_E0PD
@@ -1600,7 +1614,6 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 		.field_pos = ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT,
 		.min_field_value = ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_ARCHITECTED,
 		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
-		.cpu_enable = cpu_enable_address_auth,
 	},
 	{
 		.desc = "Address authentication (IMP DEF algorithm)",
@@ -1611,6 +1624,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 		.field_pos = ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT,
 		.min_field_value = ID_AA64ISAR1_API_IMP_DEF,
 		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
+	},
+	{
+		.capability = ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+		.matches = has_address_auth,
 		.cpu_enable = cpu_enable_address_auth,
 	},
 	{
@@ -1633,6 +1651,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 		.min_field_value = ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_IMP_DEF,
 		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
 	},
+	{
+		.capability = ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+		.matches = has_generic_auth,
+	},
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
 	{
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 03/17] arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

We currently enable ptrauth for userspace, but do not use it within the
kernel. We're going to enable it for the kernel, and will need to manage
a separate set of ptrauth keys for the kernel.

We currently keep all 5 keys in struct ptrauth_keys. However, as the
kernel will only need to use 1 key, it is a bit wasteful to allocate a
whole ptrauth_keys struct for every thread.

Therefore, a subsequent patch will define a separate struct, with only 1
key, for the kernel. In preparation for that, rename the existing struct
(and associated macros and functions) to reflect that they are specific
to userspace.

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-positioned the patch to reduce the diff]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h | 12 ++++++------
 arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h    |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c      |  8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c            | 16 ++++++++--------
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
index 7a24bad..799b079 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct ptrauth_key {
  * We give each process its own keys, which are shared by all threads. The keys
  * are inherited upon fork(), and reinitialised upon exec*().
  */
-struct ptrauth_keys {
+struct ptrauth_keys_user {
 	struct ptrauth_key apia;
 	struct ptrauth_key apib;
 	struct ptrauth_key apda;
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct ptrauth_keys {
 	struct ptrauth_key apga;
 };
 
-static inline void ptrauth_keys_init(struct ptrauth_keys *keys)
+static inline void ptrauth_keys_init_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
 {
 	if (system_supports_address_auth()) {
 		get_random_bytes(&keys->apia, sizeof(keys->apia));
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ do {								\
 	write_sysreg_s(__pki_v.hi, SYS_ ## k ## KEYHI_EL1);	\
 } while (0)
 
-static inline void ptrauth_keys_switch(struct ptrauth_keys *keys)
+static inline void ptrauth_keys_switch_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
 {
 	if (system_supports_address_auth()) {
 		__ptrauth_key_install(APIA, keys->apia);
@@ -80,12 +80,12 @@ static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)					\
 do {									\
 	struct task_struct *__ptiu_tsk = (tsk);				\
-	ptrauth_keys_init(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
-	ptrauth_keys_switch(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
+	ptrauth_keys_init_user(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
+	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
 } while (0)
 
 #define ptrauth_thread_switch(tsk)	\
-	ptrauth_keys_switch(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
+	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 #define ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)	(-EINVAL)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index 5ba6320..496a928 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct thread_struct {
 	unsigned long		fault_code;	/* ESR_EL1 value */
 	struct debug_info	debug;		/* debugging */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
-	struct ptrauth_keys	keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user	keys_user;
 #endif
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
index c507b58..af5a638 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg)
 {
-	struct ptrauth_keys *keys = &tsk->thread.keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys = &tsk->thread.keys_user;
 	unsigned long addr_key_mask = PR_PAC_APIAKEY | PR_PAC_APIBKEY |
 				      PR_PAC_APDAKEY | PR_PAC_APDBKEY;
 	unsigned long key_mask = addr_key_mask | PR_PAC_APGAKEY;
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!arg) {
-		ptrauth_keys_init(keys);
-		ptrauth_keys_switch(keys);
+		ptrauth_keys_init_user(keys);
+		ptrauth_keys_switch_user(keys);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg)
 	if (arg & PR_PAC_APGAKEY)
 		get_random_bytes(&keys->apga, sizeof(keys->apga));
 
-	ptrauth_keys_switch(keys);
+	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(keys);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index cd6e5fa..b3d3005 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static struct ptrauth_key pac_key_from_user(__uint128_t ukey)
 }
 
 static void pac_address_keys_to_user(struct user_pac_address_keys *ukeys,
-				     const struct ptrauth_keys *keys)
+				     const struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
 {
 	ukeys->apiakey = pac_key_to_user(&keys->apia);
 	ukeys->apibkey = pac_key_to_user(&keys->apib);
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void pac_address_keys_to_user(struct user_pac_address_keys *ukeys,
 	ukeys->apdbkey = pac_key_to_user(&keys->apdb);
 }
 
-static void pac_address_keys_from_user(struct ptrauth_keys *keys,
+static void pac_address_keys_from_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys,
 				       const struct user_pac_address_keys *ukeys)
 {
 	keys->apia = pac_key_from_user(ukeys->apiakey);
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ static int pac_address_keys_get(struct task_struct *target,
 				unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
 				void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
 {
-	struct ptrauth_keys *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
 	struct user_pac_address_keys user_keys;
 
 	if (!system_supports_address_auth())
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ static int pac_address_keys_set(struct task_struct *target,
 				unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
 				const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf)
 {
-	struct ptrauth_keys *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
 	struct user_pac_address_keys user_keys;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1056,12 +1056,12 @@ static int pac_address_keys_set(struct task_struct *target,
 }
 
 static void pac_generic_keys_to_user(struct user_pac_generic_keys *ukeys,
-				     const struct ptrauth_keys *keys)
+				     const struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
 {
 	ukeys->apgakey = pac_key_to_user(&keys->apga);
 }
 
-static void pac_generic_keys_from_user(struct ptrauth_keys *keys,
+static void pac_generic_keys_from_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys,
 				       const struct user_pac_generic_keys *ukeys)
 {
 	keys->apga = pac_key_from_user(ukeys->apgakey);
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int pac_generic_keys_get(struct task_struct *target,
 				unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
 				void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
 {
-	struct ptrauth_keys *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
 	struct user_pac_generic_keys user_keys;
 
 	if (!system_supports_generic_auth())
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int pac_generic_keys_set(struct task_struct *target,
 				unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
 				const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf)
 {
-	struct ptrauth_keys *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys = &target->thread.keys_user;
 	struct user_pac_generic_keys user_keys;
 	int ret;
 
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 04/17] arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

As we're going to enable pointer auth within the kernel and use a
different APIAKey for the kernel itself, so move the user APIAKey
switch to EL0 exception return.

The other 4 keys could remain switched during task switch, but are also
moved to keep things consistent.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: commit msg, re-positioned the patch, comments]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 * Small change in comment.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h     | 23 +--------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c           | 11 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S                 |  3 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c          |  3 --
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c               |  1 -
 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3482348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H
+#define __ASM_ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H
+
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/sysreg.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+/*
+ * thread.keys_user.ap* as offset exceeds the #imm offset range
+ * so use the base value of ldp as thread.keys_user and offset as
+ * thread.keys_user.ap*.
+ */
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+	mov	\tmp1, #THREAD_KEYS_USER
+	add	\tmp1, \tsk, \tmp1
+alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
+	b	.Laddr_auth_skip_\@
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APIA]
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APIB]
+	msr_s	SYS_APIBKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APIBKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDA]
+	msr_s	SYS_APDAKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APDAKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDB]
+	msr_s	SYS_APDBKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APDBKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+.Laddr_auth_skip_\@:
+alternative_if ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APGA]
+	msr_s	SYS_APGAKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APGAKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+	.endm
+
+#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
+
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+	.endm
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
+
+#endif /* __ASM_ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
index 799b079..dabe026 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
@@ -50,19 +50,6 @@ do {								\
 	write_sysreg_s(__pki_v.hi, SYS_ ## k ## KEYHI_EL1);	\
 } while (0)
 
-static inline void ptrauth_keys_switch_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
-{
-	if (system_supports_address_auth()) {
-		__ptrauth_key_install(APIA, keys->apia);
-		__ptrauth_key_install(APIB, keys->apib);
-		__ptrauth_key_install(APDA, keys->apda);
-		__ptrauth_key_install(APDB, keys->apdb);
-	}
-
-	if (system_supports_generic_auth())
-		__ptrauth_key_install(APGA, keys->apga);
-}
-
 extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg);
 
 /*
@@ -78,20 +65,12 @@ static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
 }
 
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)					\
-do {									\
-	struct task_struct *__ptiu_tsk = (tsk);				\
-	ptrauth_keys_init_user(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
-	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(&__ptiu_tsk->thread.keys_user);		\
-} while (0)
-
-#define ptrauth_thread_switch(tsk)	\
-	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
+	ptrauth_keys_init_user(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 #define ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)	(-EINVAL)
 #define ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr)	(lr)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
-#define ptrauth_thread_switch(tsk)
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 #endif /* __ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index a5bdce8..7b1ea2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ int main(void)
 #endif
   BLANK();
   DEFINE(THREAD_CPU_CONTEXT,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.cpu_context));
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+  DEFINE(THREAD_KEYS_USER,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.keys_user));
+#endif
   BLANK();
   DEFINE(S_X0,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[0]));
   DEFINE(S_X2,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[2]));
@@ -128,5 +131,13 @@ int main(void)
   DEFINE(SDEI_EVENT_INTREGS,	offsetof(struct sdei_registered_event, interrupted_regs));
   DEFINE(SDEI_EVENT_PRIORITY,	offsetof(struct sdei_registered_event, priority));
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APIA,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apia));
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APIB,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apib));
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDA,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apda));
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDB,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apdb));
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APGA,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apga));
+  BLANK();
+#endif
   return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 9461d81..684e475 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/asm_pointer_auth.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/errno.h>
 #include <asm/esr.h>
@@ -341,6 +342,8 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
 	msr	cntkctl_el1, x1
 4:
 #endif
+	ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, x0, x1, x2
+
 	apply_ssbd 0, x0, x1
 	.endif
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
index af5a638..1e77736 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pointer_auth.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg)
 
 	if (!arg) {
 		ptrauth_keys_init_user(keys);
-		ptrauth_keys_switch_user(keys);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -41,7 +40,5 @@ int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg)
 	if (arg & PR_PAC_APGAKEY)
 		get_random_bytes(&keys->apga, sizeof(keys->apga));
 
-	ptrauth_keys_switch_user(keys);
-
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 0062605..6140e79 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
 	contextidr_thread_switch(next);
 	entry_task_switch(next);
 	uao_thread_switch(next);
-	ptrauth_thread_switch(next);
 	ssbs_thread_switch(next);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 05/17] arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

This patch allows __cpu_setup to be invoked with one of these flags,
ARM64_CPU_BOOT_PRIMARY, ARM64_CPU_BOOT_SECONDARY or ARM64_CPU_RUNTIME.
This is required as some cpufeatures need different handling during
different scenarios.

The input parameter in x0 is preserved till the end to be used inside
this function.

There should be no functional change with this patch and is useful
for the subsequent ptrauth patch which utilizes it. Some upcoming
arm cpufeatures can also utilize these flags.

Suggested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 - Added more description as asked by Vincenzo.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h |  8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/head.S     |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S    |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S         | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index a0c8a0b..79bc5742 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
 #define CPU_STUCK_REASON_52_BIT_VA	(UL(1) << CPU_STUCK_REASON_SHIFT)
 #define CPU_STUCK_REASON_NO_GRAN	(UL(2) << CPU_STUCK_REASON_SHIFT)
 
+/* Possible options for __cpu_setup */
+/* Option to setup primary cpu */
+#define ARM64_CPU_BOOT_PRIMARY		(1)
+/* Option to setup secondary cpus */
+#define ARM64_CPU_BOOT_SECONDARY	(2)
+/* Option to setup cpus for different cpu run time services */
+#define ARM64_CPU_RUNTIME		(3)
+
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 #include <asm/percpu.h>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
index 989b194..797573f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ ENTRY(stext)
 	 * On return, the CPU will be ready for the MMU to be turned on and
 	 * the TCR will have been set.
 	 */
+	mov	x0, #ARM64_CPU_BOOT_PRIMARY
 	bl	__cpu_setup			// initialise processor
 	b	__primary_switch
 ENDPROC(stext)
@@ -712,6 +713,7 @@ secondary_startup:
 	 * Common entry point for secondary CPUs.
 	 */
 	bl	__cpu_secondary_check52bitva
+	mov	x0, #ARM64_CPU_BOOT_SECONDARY
 	bl	__cpu_setup			// initialise processor
 	adrp	x1, swapper_pg_dir
 	bl	__enable_mmu
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
index f5b04dd..7b2f2e6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
 
 	.text
 /*
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ ENDPROC(__cpu_suspend_enter)
 	.pushsection ".idmap.text", "awx"
 ENTRY(cpu_resume)
 	bl	el2_setup		// if in EL2 drop to EL1 cleanly
+	mov	x0, #ARM64_CPU_RUNTIME
 	bl	__cpu_setup
 	/* enable the MMU early - so we can access sleep_save_stash by va */
 	adrp	x1, swapper_pg_dir
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index aafed69..ea0db17 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -408,31 +408,31 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(idmap_kpti_install_ng_mappings)
 /*
  *	__cpu_setup
  *
- *	Initialise the processor for turning the MMU on.  Return in x0 the
- *	value of the SCTLR_EL1 register.
+ *	Initialise the processor for turning the MMU on.
+ *
+ * Input:
+ *	x0 with a flag ARM64_CPU_BOOT_PRIMARY/ARM64_CPU_BOOT_SECONDARY/ARM64_CPU_RUNTIME.
+ * Output:
+ *	Return in x0 the value of the SCTLR_EL1 register.
  */
 	.pushsection ".idmap.text", "awx"
 SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
 	tlbi	vmalle1				// Invalidate local TLB
 	dsb	nsh
 
-	mov	x0, #3 << 20
-	msr	cpacr_el1, x0			// Enable FP/ASIMD
-	mov	x0, #1 << 12			// Reset mdscr_el1 and disable
-	msr	mdscr_el1, x0			// access to the DCC from EL0
+	mov	x1, #3 << 20
+	msr	cpacr_el1, x1			// Enable FP/ASIMD
+	mov	x1, #1 << 12			// Reset mdscr_el1 and disable
+	msr	mdscr_el1, x1			// access to the DCC from EL0
 	isb					// Unmask debug exceptions now,
 	enable_dbg				// since this is per-cpu
-	reset_pmuserenr_el0 x0			// Disable PMU access from EL0
+	reset_pmuserenr_el0 x1			// Disable PMU access from EL0
 	/*
 	 * Memory region attributes
 	 */
 	mov_q	x5, MAIR_EL1_SET
 	msr	mair_el1, x5
 	/*
-	 * Prepare SCTLR
-	 */
-	mov_q	x0, SCTLR_EL1_SET
-	/*
 	 * Set/prepare TCR and TTBR. We use 512GB (39-bit) address range for
 	 * both user and kernel.
 	 */
@@ -468,5 +468,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
 1:
 #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM */
 	msr	tcr_el1, x10
+	/*
+	 * Prepare SCTLR
+	 */
+	mov_q	x0, SCTLR_EL1_SET
 	ret					// return to head.S
 SYM_FUNC_END(__cpu_setup)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 06/17] arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

These helpers are used only by functions inside cpufeature.c and
hence makes sense to be moved from cpufeature.h to cpufeature.c as
they are not expected to be used globally.

This change helps in reducing the header file size as well as to add
future cpu capability types without confusion. Only a cpu capability
type macro is sufficient to expose those capabilities globally.

Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 ------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 0fd1feb..ae9673a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -340,18 +340,6 @@ static inline int cpucap_default_scope(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
 	return cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_MASK;
 }
 
-static inline bool
-cpucap_late_cpu_optional(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
-{
-	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU);
-}
-
-static inline bool
-cpucap_late_cpu_permitted(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
-{
-	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU);
-}
-
 /*
  * Generic helper for handling capabilties with multiple (match,enable) pairs
  * of call backs, sharing the same capability bit.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 01f50f0..04ecf1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1363,6 +1363,19 @@ static bool can_use_gic_priorities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 }
 #endif
 
+/* Internal helper functions to match cpu capability type */
+static bool
+cpucap_late_cpu_optional(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
+{
+	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU);
+}
+
+static bool
+cpucap_late_cpu_permitted(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
+{
+	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU);
+}
+
 static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 	{
 		.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 07/17] arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] arm64: enable ptrauth earlier Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

Each system capability can be of either boot, local, or system scope,
depending on when the state of the capability is finalized. When we
detect a conflict on a late CPU, we either offline the CPU or panic the
system. We currently always panic if the conflict is caused by a boot
scope capability, and offline the CPU if the conflict is caused by a
local or system scope capability.

We're going to want to add a new capability (for pointer authentication)
which needs to be boot scope but doesn't need to panic the system when a
conflict is detected. So add a new flag to specify whether the
capability requires the system to panic or not. Current boot scope
capabilities are updated to set the flag, so there should be no
functional change as a result of this patch.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index ae9673a..9818ff8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -208,6 +208,10 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
  *     In some non-typical cases either both (a) and (b), or neither,
  *     should be permitted. This can be described by including neither
  *     or both flags in the capability's type field.
+ *
+ *     In case of a conflict, the CPU is prevented from booting. If the
+ *     ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT flag is specified for the capability,
+ *     then a kernel panic is triggered.
  */
 
 
@@ -240,6 +244,8 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU	((u16)BIT(4))
 /* Is it safe for a late CPU to miss this capability when system has it */
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU	((u16)BIT(5))
+/* Panic when a conflict is detected */
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT		((u16)BIT(6))
 
 /*
  * CPU errata workarounds that need to be enabled at boot time if one or
@@ -279,9 +285,11 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 
 /*
  * CPU feature used early in the boot based on the boot CPU. All secondary
- * CPUs must match the state of the capability as detected by the boot CPU.
+ * CPUs must match the state of the capability as detected by the boot CPU. In
+ * case of a conflict, a kernel panic is triggered.
  */
-#define ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_BOOT_CPU
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE		\
+	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_BOOT_CPU | ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT)
 
 struct arm64_cpu_capabilities {
 	const char *desc;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 04ecf1c..d6033f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,12 @@ cpucap_late_cpu_permitted(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
 	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU);
 }
 
+static bool
+cpucap_panic_on_conflict(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
+{
+	return !!(cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT);
+}
+
 static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 	{
 		.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
@@ -2018,10 +2024,8 @@ static void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
  * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
  * If the system has already detected a capability, take necessary
  * action on this CPU.
- *
- * Returns "false" on conflicts.
  */
-static bool verify_local_cpu_caps(u16 scope_mask)
+static void verify_local_cpu_caps(u16 scope_mask)
 {
 	int i;
 	bool cpu_has_cap, system_has_cap;
@@ -2066,10 +2070,12 @@ static bool verify_local_cpu_caps(u16 scope_mask)
 		pr_crit("CPU%d: Detected conflict for capability %d (%s), System: %d, CPU: %d\n",
 			smp_processor_id(), caps->capability,
 			caps->desc, system_has_cap, cpu_has_cap);
-		return false;
-	}
 
-	return true;
+		if (cpucap_panic_on_conflict(caps))
+			cpu_panic_kernel();
+		else
+			cpu_die_early();
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2079,12 +2085,8 @@ static bool verify_local_cpu_caps(u16 scope_mask)
 static void check_early_cpu_features(void)
 {
 	verify_cpu_asid_bits();
-	/*
-	 * Early features are used by the kernel already. If there
-	 * is a conflict, we cannot proceed further.
-	 */
-	if (!verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_BOOT_CPU))
-		cpu_panic_kernel();
+
+	verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_BOOT_CPU);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -2132,8 +2134,7 @@ static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
 	 * check_early_cpu_features(), as they need to be verified
 	 * on all secondary CPUs.
 	 */
-	if (!verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_ALL & ~SCOPE_BOOT_CPU))
-		cpu_die_early();
+	verify_local_cpu_caps(SCOPE_ALL & ~SCOPE_BOOT_CPU);
 
 	verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
 
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 08/17] arm64: enable ptrauth earlier
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

When the kernel is compiled with pointer auth instructions, the boot CPU
needs to start using address auth very early, so change the cpucap to
account for this.

Pointer auth must be enabled before we call C functions, because it is
not possible to enter a function with pointer auth disabled and exit it
with pointer auth enabled. Note, mismatches between architected and
IMPDEF algorithms will still be caught by the cpufeature framework (the
separate *_ARCH and *_IMP_DEF cpucaps).

Note the change in behavior: if the boot CPU has address auth and a
late CPU does not, then the late CPU is parked by the cpufeature
framework. This is possible as kernel will only have NOP space intructions
for PAC so such mismatched late cpu will silently ignore those
instructions in C functions. Also, if the boot CPU does not have address
auth and the late CPU has then the late cpu will still boot but with
ptrauth feature disabled.

Leave generic authentication as a "system scope" cpucap for now, since
initially the kernel will only use address authentication.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-worked ptrauth setup logic, comments]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Change since v6:
 * Removed refernces of unused CPU_STUCK_REASON_NO_PTRAUTH.
 * Updated commit logs.

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                  |  6 ++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  9 +++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 13 +++----------
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S                | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 0b30e88..87e2cbb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1515,6 +1515,12 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	  be enabled. However, KVM guest also require VHE mode and hence
 	  CONFIG_ARM64_VHE=y option to use this feature.
 
+	  If the feature is present on the boot CPU but not on a late CPU, then
+	  the late CPU will be parked. Also, if the boot CPU does not have
+	  address auth and the late CPU has then the late CPU will still boot
+	  but with the feature disabled. On such a system, this option should
+	  not be selected.
+
 endmenu
 
 menu "ARMv8.5 architectural features"
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9818ff8..9cffe7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -291,6 +291,15 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE		\
 	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_BOOT_CPU | ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT)
 
+/*
+ * CPU feature used early in the boot based on the boot CPU. It is safe for a
+ * late CPU to have this feature even though the boot CPU hasn't enabled it,
+ * although the feature will not be used by Linux in this case. If the boot CPU
+ * has enabled this feature already, then every late CPU must have it.
+ */
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE                  \
+	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_BOOT_CPU | ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU)
+
 struct arm64_cpu_capabilities {
 	const char *desc;
 	u16 capability;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index d6033f4..f6c0cb7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1318,12 +1318,6 @@ static void cpu_clear_disr(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
-static void cpu_enable_address_auth(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
-{
-	sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, 0, SCTLR_ELx_ENIA | SCTLR_ELx_ENIB |
-				       SCTLR_ELx_ENDA | SCTLR_ELx_ENDB);
-}
-
 static bool has_address_auth(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 			     int __unused)
 {
@@ -1627,7 +1621,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 	{
 		.desc = "Address authentication (architected algorithm)",
 		.capability = ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_ARCH,
-		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
 		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1,
 		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
 		.field_pos = ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT,
@@ -1637,7 +1631,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 	{
 		.desc = "Address authentication (IMP DEF algorithm)",
 		.capability = ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH_IMP_DEF,
-		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
 		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1,
 		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
 		.field_pos = ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT,
@@ -1646,9 +1640,8 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
 	},
 	{
 		.capability = ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH,
-		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,
 		.matches = has_address_auth,
-		.cpu_enable = cpu_enable_address_auth,
 	},
 	{
 		.desc = "Generic authentication (architected algorithm)",
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index ea0db17..4cf19a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
 #define TCR_TG_FLAGS	TCR_TG0_64K | TCR_TG1_64K
@@ -468,9 +469,39 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
 1:
 #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM */
 	msr	tcr_el1, x10
+	mov	x1, x0
 	/*
 	 * Prepare SCTLR
 	 */
 	mov_q	x0, SCTLR_EL1_SET
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+	/* No ptrauth setup for run time cpus */
+	cmp	x1, #ARM64_CPU_RUNTIME
+	b.eq	3f
+
+	/* Check if the CPU supports ptrauth */
+	mrs	x2, id_aa64isar1_el1
+	ubfx	x2, x2, #ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT, #8
+	cbz	x2, 3f
+
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, xzr
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, xzr
+
+	/* Just enable ptrauth for primary cpu */
+	cmp	x1, #ARM64_CPU_BOOT_PRIMARY
+	b.eq	2f
+
+	/* if !system_supports_address_auth() then skip enable */
+alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
+	b	3f
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+
+2:	/* Enable ptrauth instructions */
+	ldr	x2, =SCTLR_ELx_ENIA | SCTLR_ELx_ENIB | \
+		     SCTLR_ELx_ENDA | SCTLR_ELx_ENDB
+	orr	x0, x0, x2
+3:
+#endif
 	ret					// return to head.S
 SYM_FUNC_END(__cpu_setup)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 09/17] arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] arm64: enable ptrauth earlier Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

Set up keys to use pointer authentication within the kernel. The kernel
will be compiled with APIAKey instructions, the other keys are currently
unused. Each task is given its own APIAKey, which is initialized during
fork. The key is changed during context switch and on kernel entry from
EL0.

The keys for idle threads need to be set before calling any C functions,
because it is not possible to enter and exit a function with different
keys.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Modified secondary cores key structure, comments]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h     | 13 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h        |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h              |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c           |  5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S                 |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c               |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   |  8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S                      | 12 ++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
index 3482348..d3f4aee 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
@@ -39,11 +39,25 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.endm
 
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+alternative_if ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
+	mov	\tmp1, #THREAD_KEYS_KERNEL
+	add	\tmp1, \tsk, \tmp1
+	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_KERNEL_KEY_APIA]
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+	isb
+alternative_else_nop_endif
+	.endm
+
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
 	.endm
 
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+	.endm
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 #endif /* __ASM_ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
index dabe026..aa956ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ struct ptrauth_keys_user {
 	struct ptrauth_key apga;
 };
 
+struct ptrauth_keys_kernel {
+	struct ptrauth_key apia;
+};
+
 static inline void ptrauth_keys_init_user(struct ptrauth_keys_user *keys)
 {
 	if (system_supports_address_auth()) {
@@ -50,6 +54,12 @@ do {								\
 	write_sysreg_s(__pki_v.hi, SYS_ ## k ## KEYHI_EL1);	\
 } while (0)
 
+static inline void ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kernel *keys)
+{
+	if (system_supports_address_auth())
+		get_random_bytes(&keys->apia, sizeof(keys->apia));
+}
+
 extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg);
 
 /*
@@ -66,11 +76,14 @@ static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
 
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)					\
 	ptrauth_keys_init_user(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
+#define ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(tsk)					\
+	ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(&(tsk)->thread.keys_kernel)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 #define ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)	(-EINVAL)
 #define ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr)	(lr)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
+#define ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(tsk)
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 #endif /* __ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index 496a928..4c77da5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ struct thread_struct {
 	struct debug_info	debug;		/* debugging */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	struct ptrauth_keys_user	keys_user;
+	struct ptrauth_keys_kernel	keys_kernel;
 #endif
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 79bc5742..a9a42c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <linux/threads.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/thread_info.h>
+#include <asm/pointer_auth.h>
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number);
 
@@ -95,6 +96,9 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void);
 struct secondary_data {
 	void *stack;
 	struct task_struct *task;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+	struct ptrauth_keys_kernel ptrauth_key;
+#endif
 	long status;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 7b1ea2a..9981a0a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ int main(void)
   DEFINE(THREAD_CPU_CONTEXT,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.cpu_context));
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
   DEFINE(THREAD_KEYS_USER,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.keys_user));
+  DEFINE(THREAD_KEYS_KERNEL,	offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.keys_kernel));
 #endif
   BLANK();
   DEFINE(S_X0,			offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[0]));
@@ -91,6 +92,9 @@ int main(void)
   BLANK();
   DEFINE(CPU_BOOT_STACK,	offsetof(struct secondary_data, stack));
   DEFINE(CPU_BOOT_TASK,		offsetof(struct secondary_data, task));
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+  DEFINE(CPU_BOOT_PTRAUTH_KEY,	offsetof(struct secondary_data, ptrauth_key));
+#endif
   BLANK();
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST
   DEFINE(VCPU_CONTEXT,		offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.ctxt));
@@ -137,6 +141,7 @@ int main(void)
   DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDA,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apda));
   DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APDB,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apdb));
   DEFINE(PTRAUTH_USER_KEY_APGA,		offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_user, apga));
+  DEFINE(PTRAUTH_KERNEL_KEY_APIA,	offsetof(struct ptrauth_keys_kernel, apia));
   BLANK();
 #endif
   return 0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 684e475..3dad2d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ alternative_cb_end
 
 	apply_ssbd 1, x22, x23
 
+	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, x20, x22, x23
 	.else
 	add	x21, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE
 	get_current_task tsk
@@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
 	msr	cntkctl_el1, x1
 4:
 #endif
+	/* No kernel C function calls after this as user keys are set. */
 	ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, x0, x1, x2
 
 	apply_ssbd 0, x0, x1
@@ -898,6 +900,7 @@ ENTRY(cpu_switch_to)
 	ldr	lr, [x8]
 	mov	sp, x9
 	msr	sp_el0, x1
+	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel x1, x8, x9, x10
 	ret
 ENDPROC(cpu_switch_to)
 NOKPROBE(cpu_switch_to)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 6140e79..7db0302 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -376,6 +376,8 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long stack_start,
 	 */
 	fpsimd_flush_task_state(p);
 
+	ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(p);
+
 	if (likely(!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))) {
 		*childregs = *current_pt_regs();
 		childregs->regs[0] = 0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index d4ed9a1..0890341 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 	 */
 	secondary_data.task = idle;
 	secondary_data.stack = task_stack_page(idle) + THREAD_SIZE;
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
+	secondary_data.ptrauth_key.apia.lo = idle->thread.keys_kernel.apia.lo;
+	secondary_data.ptrauth_key.apia.hi = idle->thread.keys_kernel.apia.hi;
+#endif
 	update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_MMU_OFF);
 	__flush_dcache_area(&secondary_data, sizeof(secondary_data));
 
@@ -138,6 +142,10 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 
 	secondary_data.task = NULL;
 	secondary_data.stack = NULL;
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
+	secondary_data.ptrauth_key.apia.lo = 0;
+	secondary_data.ptrauth_key.apia.hi = 0;
+#endif
 	__flush_dcache_area(&secondary_data, sizeof(secondary_data));
 	status = READ_ONCE(secondary_data.status);
 	if (ret && status) {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index 4cf19a2..5a11a89 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -485,6 +485,10 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
 	ubfx	x2, x2, #ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT, #8
 	cbz	x2, 3f
 
+	/*
+	 * The primary cpu keys are reset here and can be
+	 * re-initialised with some proper values later.
+	 */
 	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, xzr
 	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, xzr
 
@@ -497,6 +501,14 @@ alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
 	b	3f
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 
+	/* Install ptrauth key for secondary cpus */
+	adr_l	x2, secondary_data
+	ldr	x3, [x2, #CPU_BOOT_TASK]	// get secondary_data.task
+	cbz	x3, 2f				// check for slow booting cpus
+	ldp	x3, x4, [x2, #CPU_BOOT_PTRAUTH_KEY]
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, x3
+	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, x4
+
 2:	/* Enable ptrauth instructions */
 	ldr	x2, =SCTLR_ELx_ENIA | SCTLR_ELx_ENIB | \
 		     SCTLR_ELx_ENDA | SCTLR_ELx_ENDB
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 10/17] arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

This patch uses the existing boot_init_stack_canary arch function
to initialize the ptrauth keys for the booting task in the primary
core. The requirement here is that it should be always inline and
the caller must never return.

As pointer authentication too detects a subset of stack corruption
so it makes sense to place this code here.

Both pointer authentication and stack canary codes are protected
by their respective config option.

Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h   | 11 ++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h |  5 +++++
 include/linux/stackprotector.h          |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
index aa956ca..833d3f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
@@ -54,12 +54,18 @@ do {								\
 	write_sysreg_s(__pki_v.hi, SYS_ ## k ## KEYHI_EL1);	\
 } while (0)
 
-static inline void ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kernel *keys)
+static __always_inline void ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kernel *keys)
 {
 	if (system_supports_address_auth())
 		get_random_bytes(&keys->apia, sizeof(keys->apia));
 }
 
+static __always_inline void ptrauth_keys_switch_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kernel *keys)
+{
+	if (system_supports_address_auth())
+		__ptrauth_key_install(APIA, keys->apia);
+}
+
 extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg);
 
 /*
@@ -78,12 +84,15 @@ static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
 	ptrauth_keys_init_user(&(tsk)->thread.keys_user)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(tsk)					\
 	ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(&(tsk)->thread.keys_kernel)
+#define ptrauth_thread_switch_kernel(tsk)				\
+	ptrauth_keys_switch_kernel(&(tsk)->thread.keys_kernel)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 #define ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)	(-EINVAL)
 #define ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr)	(lr)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(tsk)
+#define ptrauth_thread_switch_kernel(tsk)
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
 
 #endif /* __ASM_POINTER_AUTH_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index 5884a2b..7263e0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/version.h>
+#include <asm/pointer_auth.h>
 
 extern unsigned long __stack_chk_guard;
 
@@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ extern unsigned long __stack_chk_guard;
  */
 static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR)
 	unsigned long canary;
 
 	/* Try to get a semi random initial value. */
@@ -36,6 +38,9 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
 	current->stack_canary = canary;
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK))
 		__stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+#endif
+	ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(current);
+	ptrauth_thread_switch_kernel(current);
 }
 
 #endif	/* _ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/stackprotector.h b/include/linux/stackprotector.h
index 6b792d0..4c678c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/stackprotector.h
+++ b/include/linux/stackprotector.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
 # include <asm/stackprotector.h>
 #else
 static inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

Functions like vmap() record how much memory has been allocated by their
callers, and callers are identified using __builtin_return_address(). Once
the kernel is using pointer-auth the return address will be signed. This
means it will not match any kernel symbol, and will vary between threads
even for the same caller.

The output of /proc/vmallocinfo in this case may look like,
0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0xc5c78000100e7c60 pages=4 vmalloc N0=4

The above three 64bit values should be the same symbol name and not
different LR values.

Use the pre-processor to add logic to clear the PAC to
__builtin_return_address() callers. This patch adds a new file
asm/compiler.h and is transitively included via include/compiler_types.h on
the compiler command line so it is guaranteed to be loaded and the users of
this macro will not find a wrong version.

Helper macros ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask/ptrauth_clear_pac are created for
this purpose and added in this file. Existing macro ptrauth_user_pac_mask
moved from asm/pointer_auth.h.

Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 * Added ptrauth_user_pac_mask check along with ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask in
   __builtin_return_address as pointed by James.
 * Updated commit message.

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h |  9 +--------
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 87e2cbb..115ceea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
 	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
+	select HAVE_ARCH_COMPILER_H
 	select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d886011
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_COMPILER_H
+#define __ASM_COMPILER_H
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
+
+/*
+ * The EL0/EL1 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
+ * This is dependent on TBI0/TBI1 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also apply.
+ */
+#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()		GENMASK_ULL(54, vabits_actual)
+#define ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()	GENMASK_ULL(63, vabits_actual)
+
+/* Valid for EL0 TTBR0 and EL1 TTBR1 instruction pointers */
+#define ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr)						\
+	((ptr & BIT_ULL(55)) ? (ptr | ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()) :	\
+			       (ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask()))
+
+#define __builtin_return_address(val)					\
+	(void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val)))
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
+
+#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
index 833d3f9..70c4715 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
@@ -68,16 +68,9 @@ static __always_inline void ptrauth_keys_switch_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kerne
 
 extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long arg);
 
-/*
- * The EL0 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
- * This is dependent on TBI0 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also apply.
- */
-#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()	GENMASK(54, vabits_actual)
-
-/* Only valid for EL0 TTBR0 instruction pointers */
 static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
 {
-	return ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask();
+	return ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr);
 }
 
 #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)					\
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 12/17] arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:04 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

When we enable pointer authentication in the kernel, LR values saved to
the stack will have a PAC which we must strip in order to retrieve the
real return address.

Strip PACs when unwinding the stack in order to account for this.

When function graph tracer is used with patchable-function-entry then
return_to_handler will also have pac bits so strip it too.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-position ptrauth_strip_insn_pac, comment]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 * Mask PAC bits of return_to_handler in case of FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER.

   incase 
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index a336cb1..139679c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
 
 #include <asm/irq.h>
+#include <asm/pointer_auth.h>
 #include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
 
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 	if (tsk->ret_stack &&
-			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
+		(ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc) == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
 		struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
 		/*
 		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
@@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
 
+	frame->pc = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(frame->pc);
+
 	/*
 	 * Frames created upon entry from EL0 have NULL FP and PC values, so
 	 * don't bother reporting these. Frames created by __noreturn functions
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 13/17] arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:05 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

lr is printed with %pS which will try to find an entry in kallsyms.
After enabling pointer authentication, this match will fail due to
PAC present in the lr.

Strip PAC from the lr to display the correct symbol name.

Suggested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 7db0302..cacae29 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		printk("pc : %pS\n", (void *)regs->pc);
-		printk("lr : %pS\n", (void *)lr);
+		printk("lr : %pS\n", (void *)ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr));
 	} else {
 		printk("pc : %016llx\n", regs->pc);
 		printk("lr : %016llx\n", lr);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 14/17] arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:05 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option' Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

This patch restores the kernel keys from current task during cpu resume
after the mmu is turned on and ptrauth is enabled.

A flag is added in macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel to check if isb
instruction needs to be executed.

Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h | 6 ++++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S                 | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S                      | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
index d3f4aee..ce2a848 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm_pointer_auth.h
@@ -39,14 +39,16 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.endm
 
-	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, sync, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
 alternative_if ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
 	mov	\tmp1, #THREAD_KEYS_KERNEL
 	add	\tmp1, \tsk, \tmp1
 	ldp	\tmp2, \tmp3, [\tmp1, #PTRAUTH_KERNEL_KEY_APIA]
 	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYLO_EL1, \tmp2
 	msr_s	SYS_APIAKEYHI_EL1, \tmp3
+	.if     \sync == 1
 	isb
+	.endif
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.endm
 
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
 	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_user tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
 	.endm
 
-	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
+	.macro ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, sync, tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
 	.endm
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 3dad2d0..6273d7b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ alternative_cb_end
 
 	apply_ssbd 1, x22, x23
 
-	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, x20, x22, x23
+	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel tsk, 1, x20, x22, x23
 	.else
 	add	x21, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE
 	get_current_task tsk
@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ ENTRY(cpu_switch_to)
 	ldr	lr, [x8]
 	mov	sp, x9
 	msr	sp_el0, x1
-	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel x1, x8, x9, x10
+	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel x1, 1, x8, x9, x10
 	ret
 ENDPROC(cpu_switch_to)
 NOKPROBE(cpu_switch_to)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index 5a11a89..4450dc8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/asm_pointer_auth.h>
 #include <asm/hwcap.h>
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN
 	msr_s	SYS_DISR_EL1, xzr
 alternative_else_nop_endif
 
+	ptrauth_keys_install_kernel x14, 0, x1, x2, x3
 	isb
 	ret
 SYM_FUNC_END(cpu_do_resume)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option'
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:05 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-13  9:10   ` Masahiro Yamada
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	linux-kbuild, Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Masahiro Yamada,
	Mark Brown, James Morse, Ramana Radhakrishnan,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino, Will Deacon,
	Ard Biesheuvel

From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>

Currently kconfig does not have a feature that allows to detect if the
used assembler supports a specific compilation option.

Introduce 'as-option' to serve this purpose in the context of Kconfig:

        config X
                def_bool $(as-option,...)

Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 scripts/Kconfig.include | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
index 85334dc..a1c1925 100644
--- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
+++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
@@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -S -x c /dev/null -o /de
 # Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
 ld-option = $(success,$(LD) -v $(1))
 
+# $(as-option,<flag>)
+# /dev/zero is used as output instead of /dev/null as some assembler cribs when
+# both input and output are same. Also both of them have same write behaviour so
+# can be easily substituted.
+as-option = $(success, $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -c -x assembler /dev/null -o /dev/zero)
+
 # $(as-instr,<instr>)
 # Return y if the assembler supports <instr>, n otherwise
 as-instr = $(success,printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -c -x assembler -o /dev/null -)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 16/17] arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option' Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:05 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-19 18:19   ` [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH Nick Desaulniers
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-18 14:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Catalin Marinas
  17 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Masahiro Yamada, Mark Brown,
	James Morse, Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap,
	Vincenzo Frascino, Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

From: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>

Compile all functions with two ptrauth instructions: PACIASP in the
prologue to sign the return address, and AUTIASP in the epilogue to
authenticate the return address (from the stack). If authentication
fails, the return will cause an instruction abort to be taken, followed
by an oops and killing the task.

This should help protect the kernel against attacks using
return-oriented programming. As ptrauth protects the return address, it
can also serve as a replacement for CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR, although note
that it does not protect other parts of the stack.

The new instructions are in the HINT encoding space, so on a system
without ptrauth they execute as NOPs.

CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH now not only enables ptrauth for userspace and KVM
guests, but also automatically builds the kernel with ptrauth
instructions if the compiler supports it. If there is no compiler
support, we do not warn that the kernel was built without ptrauth
instructions.

GCC 7 and 8 support the -msign-return-address option, while GCC 9
deprecates that option and replaces it with -mbranch-protection. Support
both options.

Clang uses an external assembler hence this patch makes sure that the
correct parameters (-march=armv8.3-a) are passed down to help it recognize
the ptrauth instructions.

Ftrace function tracer works properly with Ptrauth only when
patchable-function-entry feature is present and is ensured by the
Kconfig dependency.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> # not co-dev parts
Co-developed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Cover leaf function, comments, Ftrace Kconfig]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
Changes since v6:
 * Added Kconfig dependency that if FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is there
   then DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS should also be present as suggested by James.

 arch/arm64/Kconfig  | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/Makefile | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 115ceea..155041a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1499,6 +1499,8 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	bool "Enable support for pointer authentication"
 	default y
 	depends on !KVM || ARM64_VHE
+	depends on (CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS || CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) && AS_HAS_PAC
+	depends on (!FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER || DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)
 	help
 	  Pointer authentication (part of the ARMv8.3 Extensions) provides
 	  instructions for signing and authenticating pointers against secret
@@ -1506,11 +1508,17 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	  and other attacks.
 
 	  This option enables these instructions at EL0 (i.e. for userspace).
-
 	  Choosing this option will cause the kernel to initialise secret keys
 	  for each process at exec() time, with these keys being
 	  context-switched along with the process.
 
+	  If the compiler supports the -mbranch-protection or
+	  -msign-return-address flag (e.g. GCC 7 or later), then this option
+	  will also cause the kernel itself to be compiled with return address
+	  protection. In this case, and if the target hardware is known to
+	  support pointer authentication, then CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR can be
+	  disabled with minimal loss of protection.
+
 	  The feature is detected at runtime. If the feature is not present in
 	  hardware it will not be advertised to userspace/KVM guest nor will it
 	  be enabled. However, KVM guest also require VHE mode and hence
@@ -1522,6 +1530,20 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	  but with the feature disabled. On such a system, this option should
 	  not be selected.
 
+	  This feature works with FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER option only if
+	  DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS is enabled.
+
+config CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET
+	# GCC 9 or later, clang 8 or later
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf)
+
+config CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS
+	# GCC 7, 8
+	def_bool $(cc-option,-msign-return-address=all)
+
+config AS_HAS_PAC
+	def_bool $(as-option,-Wa$(comma)-march=armv8.3-a)
+
 endmenu
 
 menu "ARMv8.5 architectural features"
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
index dca1a97..f15f92b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ stack_protector_prepare: prepare0
 					include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
 endif
 
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH),y)
+branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS) := -msign-return-address=all
+branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) := -mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf
+# -march=armv8.3-a enables the non-nops instructions for PAC, to avoid the
+# compiler to generate them and consequently to break the single image contract
+# we pass it only to the assembler. This option is utilized only in case of non
+# integrated assemblers.
+branch-prot-flags-$(CONFIG_AS_HAS_PAC) += -Wa,-march=armv8.3-a
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(branch-prot-flags-y)
+endif
+
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN), y)
 KBUILD_CPPFLAGS	+= -mbig-endian
 CHECKFLAGS	+= -D__AARCH64EB__
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 17/17] lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:05 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
  2020-03-18 14:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Catalin Marinas
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel

This test is specific for arm64. When in-kernel Pointer Authentication
config is enabled, the return address stored in the stack is signed.
This feature helps in ROP kind of attack. If any parameters used to
generate the pac (<key, sp, lr>) is modified then this will fail in
the authentication stage and will lead to abort.

This test changes the input parameter APIA kernel keys to cause abort.
The pac computed from the new key can be same as last due to hash
collision so this is retried for few times as there is no reliable way
to compare the pacs. Even though this test may fail even after retries
but this may cause authentication failure at a later stage in earlier
function returns.

This test can be invoked as,
echo CORRUPT_PAC > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT

or as below if inserted as a module,
insmod lkdtm.ko cpoint_name=DIRECT cpoint_type=CORRUPT_PAC cpoint_count=1

[   13.118166] lkdtm: Performing direct entry CORRUPT_PAC
[   13.118298] lkdtm: Clearing PAC from the return address
[   13.118466] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bfff8000108648ec
[   13.118626] Mem abort info:
[   13.118666]   ESR = 0x86000004
[   13.118866]   EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[   13.118966]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[   13.119117]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0

Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c  | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c  |  1 +
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index de87693..cc92bc3 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -378,3 +378,39 @@ void lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT(void)
 	pr_err("XFAIL: this test is ia32-only\n");
 #endif
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
+static noinline void change_pac_parameters(void)
+{
+	/* Reset the keys of current task */
+	ptrauth_thread_init_kernel(current);
+	ptrauth_thread_switch_kernel(current);
+}
+
+#define CORRUPT_PAC_ITERATE	10
+noinline void lkdtm_CORRUPT_PAC(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!system_supports_address_auth()) {
+		pr_err("FAIL: arm64 pointer authentication feature not present\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	pr_info("Change the PAC parameters to force function return failure\n");
+	/*
+	 * Pac is a hash value computed from input keys, return address and
+	 * stack pointer. As pac has fewer bits so there is a chance of
+	 * collision, so iterate few times to reduce the collision probability.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < CORRUPT_PAC_ITERATE; i++)
+		change_pac_parameters();
+
+	pr_err("FAIL: %s test failed. Kernel may be unstable from here\n", __func__);
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
+noinline void lkdtm_CORRUPT_PAC(void)
+{
+	pr_err("FAIL: arm64 pointer authentication config disabled\n");
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
index ee0d6e7..5ce4ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static const struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
 	CRASHTYPE(STACK_GUARD_PAGE_LEADING),
 	CRASHTYPE(STACK_GUARD_PAGE_TRAILING),
 	CRASHTYPE(UNSET_SMEP),
+	CRASHTYPE(CORRUPT_PAC),
 	CRASHTYPE(UNALIGNED_LOAD_STORE_WRITE),
 	CRASHTYPE(OVERWRITE_ALLOCATION),
 	CRASHTYPE(WRITE_AFTER_FREE),
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
index c56d23e..8d13d01 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP(void);
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 void lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT(void);
 #endif
+void lkdtm_CORRUPT_PAC(void);
 
 /* lkdtm_heap.c */
 void __init lkdtm_heap_init(void);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option'
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option' Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-13  9:10   ` Masahiro Yamada
  2020-03-13  9:14     ` Amit Kachhap
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Masahiro Yamada @ 2020-03-13  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amit Daniel Kachhap
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list, Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin,
	Mark Brown, James Morse, Ramana Radhakrishnan, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Amit,

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:06 PM Amit Daniel Kachhap
<amit.kachhap@arm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>
> Currently kconfig does not have a feature that allows to detect if the
> used assembler supports a specific compilation option.
>
> Introduce 'as-option' to serve this purpose in the context of Kconfig:
>
>         config X
>                 def_bool $(as-option,...)
>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org


If you have a chance for v8,
could you please drop these Cc lines?

I had already given Ack, and am satisfied.
I have no more comment.

Thanks.



> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
> ---
>  scripts/Kconfig.include | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> index 85334dc..a1c1925 100644
> --- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
> +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -S -x c /dev/null -o /de
>  # Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
>  ld-option = $(success,$(LD) -v $(1))
>
> +# $(as-option,<flag>)
> +# /dev/zero is used as output instead of /dev/null as some assembler cribs when
> +# both input and output are same. Also both of them have same write behaviour so
> +# can be easily substituted.
> +as-option = $(success, $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -c -x assembler /dev/null -o /dev/zero)
> +
>  # $(as-instr,<instr>)
>  # Return y if the assembler supports <instr>, n otherwise
>  as-instr = $(success,printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -c -x assembler -o /dev/null -)
> --
> 2.7.4
>


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option'
  2020-03-13  9:10   ` Masahiro Yamada
@ 2020-03-13  9:14     ` Amit Kachhap
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Amit Kachhap @ 2020-03-13  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masahiro Yamada
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Catalin Marinas,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list, Kristina Martsenko, Dave Martin,
	Mark Brown, James Morse, Ramana Radhakrishnan, Vincenzo Frascino,
	Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel, linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

On 3/13/20 2:40 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Amit,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:06 PM Amit Daniel Kachhap
> <amit.kachhap@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>>
>> Currently kconfig does not have a feature that allows to detect if the
>> used assembler supports a specific compilation option.
>>
>> Introduce 'as-option' to serve this purpose in the context of Kconfig:
>>
>>          config X
>>                  def_bool $(as-option,...)
>>
>> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
>> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> 
> 
> If you have a chance for v8,
> could you please drop these Cc lines?

Ok sure I will remember.

Cheers,
Amit

> 
> I had already given Ack, and am satisfied.
> I have no more comment.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
>> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   scripts/Kconfig.include | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
>> index 85334dc..a1c1925 100644
>> --- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
>> +++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
>> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -S -x c /dev/null -o /de
>>   # Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
>>   ld-option = $(success,$(LD) -v $(1))
>>
>> +# $(as-option,<flag>)
>> +# /dev/zero is used as output instead of /dev/null as some assembler cribs when
>> +# both input and output are same. Also both of them have same write behaviour so
>> +# can be easily substituted.
>> +as-option = $(success, $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -c -x assembler /dev/null -o /dev/zero)
>> +
>>   # $(as-instr,<instr>)
>>   # Return y if the assembler supports <instr>, n otherwise
>>   as-instr = $(success,printf "%b\n" "$(1)" | $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS) -c -x assembler -o /dev/null -)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing
  2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-18 14:32 ` Catalin Marinas
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2020-03-18 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amit Daniel Kachhap
  Cc: Mark Rutland, Kees Cook, Suzuki K Poulose, Kristina Martsenko,
	Dave Martin, Mark Brown, James Morse, Ramana Radhakrishnan,
	Vincenzo Frascino, Will Deacon, Ard Biesheuvel, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:34:47PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Amit Daniel Kachhap (8):
>   arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check
>   arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup
>   arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file
>   arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task
>   arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address
>   arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk
>   arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys
>   lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication
> 
> Kristina Martsenko (7):
>   arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities
>   arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific
>   arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time
>   arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability
>   arm64: enable ptrauth earlier
>   arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys
>   arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing
> 
> Mark Rutland (1):
>   arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses
> 
> Vincenzo Frascino (1):
>   kconfig: Add support for 'as-option'

Queued for 5.7. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH
  2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
@ 2020-03-19 18:19   ` Nick Desaulniers
  2020-03-19 18:35     ` Nathan Chancellor
  2020-03-20 15:09     ` Catalin Marinas
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-03-19 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, will
  Cc: mark.rutland, keescook, suzuki.poulose, Nick Desaulniers,
	kristina.martsenko, ardb, yamada.masahiro, broonie, james.morse,
	clang-built-linux, ramana.radhakrishnan, amit.kachhap,
	vincenzo.frascino, Dave.Martin, linux-arm-kernel

Clang relies on GNU as from binutils to assemble the Linux kernel,
currently. A recent patch to enable the armv8.3-a extension for pointer
authentication checked for compiler support of the relevant flags.
Everything works with binutils 2.34+, but for older versions we observe
assembler errors:

/tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s:40: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_negate_ra_state'

When compiling with Clang, require the assembler to support
.cfi_negate_ra_state directives, in order to support CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/938
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
Tested with binutils 2.33.1 and ToT. Boot tested in QEMU.
I added this requirement only for Clang.

GCC maybe doesn't produce these assembler directives, or looks like GCC
8.2 produces .cfi_window_save (https://godbolt.org/z/awZWZ5, godbolt
doesn't have a newer aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc...) instead of
.cfi_negate_ra_state. Maybe ARM can sort out the inconsistency between
compilers?

If we plan to add .cfi_negate_ra_state to out of
line assembly, we may want to make AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE a hard
requirement, regardless of compiler.

Also, rather than CC_IS_GCC, we could do !CC_IS_CLANG || ...


 arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index b889d7956abf..1ee1d8fab218 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1506,6 +1506,7 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 	default y
 	depends on !KVM || ARM64_VHE
 	depends on (CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS || CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) && AS_HAS_PAC
+	depends on CC_IS_GCC || (CC_IS_CLANG && AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE)
 	depends on (!FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER || DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)
 	help
 	  Pointer authentication (part of the ARMv8.3 Extensions) provides
@@ -1550,6 +1551,9 @@ config CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS
 config AS_HAS_PAC
 	def_bool $(as-option,-Wa$(comma)-march=armv8.3-a)
 
+config AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE
+	def_bool $(as-instr,.cfi_startproc\n.cfi_negate_ra_state\n.cfi_endproc\n)
+
 endmenu
 
 menu "ARMv8.4 architectural features"
-- 
2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH
  2020-03-19 18:19   ` [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH Nick Desaulniers
@ 2020-03-19 18:35     ` Nathan Chancellor
  2020-03-20 15:09     ` Catalin Marinas
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2020-03-19 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Desaulniers
  Cc: mark.rutland, keescook, suzuki.poulose, catalin.marinas,
	kristina.martsenko, ardb, yamada.masahiro, broonie, james.morse,
	clang-built-linux, ramana.radhakrishnan, amit.kachhap,
	vincenzo.frascino, will, Dave.Martin, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:19:51AM -0700, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> Clang relies on GNU as from binutils to assemble the Linux kernel,
> currently. A recent patch to enable the armv8.3-a extension for pointer
> authentication checked for compiler support of the relevant flags.
> Everything works with binutils 2.34+, but for older versions we observe
> assembler errors:
> 
> /tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s:40: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_negate_ra_state'
> 
> When compiling with Clang, require the assembler to support
> .cfi_negate_ra_state directives, in order to support CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/938
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> ---
> Tested with binutils 2.33.1 and ToT. Boot tested in QEMU.
> I added this requirement only for Clang.
> 
> GCC maybe doesn't produce these assembler directives, or looks like GCC
> 8.2 produces .cfi_window_save (https://godbolt.org/z/awZWZ5, godbolt
> doesn't have a newer aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc...) instead of
> .cfi_negate_ra_state. Maybe ARM can sort out the inconsistency between
> compilers?
> 
> If we plan to add .cfi_negate_ra_state to out of
> line assembly, we may want to make AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE a hard
> requirement, regardless of compiler.
> 
> Also, rather than CC_IS_GCC, we could do !CC_IS_CLANG || ...
> 
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index b889d7956abf..1ee1d8fab218 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1506,6 +1506,7 @@ config ARM64_PTR_AUTH
>  	default y
>  	depends on !KVM || ARM64_VHE
>  	depends on (CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS || CC_HAS_BRANCH_PROT_PAC_RET) && AS_HAS_PAC
> +	depends on CC_IS_GCC || (CC_IS_CLANG && AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE)
>  	depends on (!FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER || DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS)
>  	help
>  	  Pointer authentication (part of the ARMv8.3 Extensions) provides
> @@ -1550,6 +1551,9 @@ config CC_HAS_SIGN_RETURN_ADDRESS
>  config AS_HAS_PAC
>  	def_bool $(as-option,-Wa$(comma)-march=armv8.3-a)
>  
> +config AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE
> +	def_bool $(as-instr,.cfi_startproc\n.cfi_negate_ra_state\n.cfi_endproc\n)
> +
>  endmenu
>  
>  menu "ARMv8.4 architectural features"
> -- 
> 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog
> 

It would be nice to make this kind of check work for both GCC and Clang
but like you noted, there appears to be inconsistencies between them so
something for another day. CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH is getting a little
gnarly in terms of dependencies but I suppose that makes sense given its
nature. I verified that AS_HAS_CFI_NEGATE_RA_STATE gets set with ToT
binutils and that it does not with an older version.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

This unlocks our CI so hopefully it can get picked up quickly.

https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/299816618

Cheers,
Nathan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH
  2020-03-19 18:19   ` [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH Nick Desaulniers
  2020-03-19 18:35     ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2020-03-20 15:09     ` Catalin Marinas
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2020-03-20 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Desaulniers
  Cc: mark.rutland, keescook, suzuki.poulose, kristina.martsenko, ardb,
	yamada.masahiro, broonie, james.morse, clang-built-linux,
	ramana.radhakrishnan, amit.kachhap, vincenzo.frascino, will,
	Dave.Martin, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:19:51AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Clang relies on GNU as from binutils to assemble the Linux kernel,
> currently. A recent patch to enable the armv8.3-a extension for pointer
> authentication checked for compiler support of the relevant flags.
> Everything works with binutils 2.34+, but for older versions we observe
> assembler errors:
> 
> /tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/vgettimeofday-36a54b.s:40: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_negate_ra_state'
> 
> When compiling with Clang, require the assembler to support
> .cfi_negate_ra_state directives, in order to support CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/938
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

Queued. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-20 15:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-13  9:04 [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] arm64: cpufeature: Fix meta-capability cpufeature check Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] arm64: cpufeature: add pointer auth meta-capabilities Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] arm64: rename ptrauth key structures to be user-specific Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] arm64: install user ptrauth keys at kernel exit time Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] arm64: ptrauth: Add bootup/runtime flags for __cpu_setup Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] arm64: cpufeature: Move cpu capability helpers inside C file Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] arm64: cpufeature: handle conflicts based on capability Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] arm64: enable ptrauth earlier Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] arm64: initialize and switch ptrauth kernel keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] arm64: initialize ptrauth keys for kernel booting task Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:04 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] arm64: unwind: strip PAC from kernel addresses Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] arm64: __show_regs: strip PAC from lr in printk Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] arm64: suspend: restore the kernel ptrauth keys Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] kconfig: Add support for 'as-option' Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:10   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-03-13  9:14     ` Amit Kachhap
2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] arm64: compile the kernel with ptrauth return address signing Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-19 18:19   ` [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: verify binutils support for ARM64_PTR_AUTH Nick Desaulniers
2020-03-19 18:35     ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-03-20 15:09     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-13  9:05 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] lkdtm: arm64: test kernel pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
2020-03-18 14:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] arm64: return address signing Catalin Marinas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).