linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:55:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <171cca9d-2a6e-248c-8502-feba8ebbe55e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719123902.1493805-2-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 7/19/21 1:38 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> A number of the PMU sysregs expose reset values that are not
> compliant with the architecture (set bits in the RES0 ranges,
> for example).
>
> This in turn has the effect that we need to pointlessly mask
> some register fields when using them.
>
> Let's start by making sure we don't have illegal values in the
> shadow registers at reset time. This affects all the registers
> that dedicate one bit per counter, the counters themselves,
> PMEVTYPERn_EL0 and PMSELR_EL0.
>
> Reported-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index f6f126eb6ac1..96bdfa0e68b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,41 @@ static unsigned int pmu_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return REG_HIDDEN;
>  }
>  
> +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	u64 n, mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> +
> +	/* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> +	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> +		return;
> +
> +	n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> +	n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> +	if (n)
> +		mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);

Hm... seems to be missing the cycle counter.

Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmevcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= GENMASK(31, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmevtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_pmselr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> +	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_COUNTER_MASK;
> +}
> +
>  static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
>  	u64 pmcr, val;
> @@ -944,16 +979,18 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
>  	  trap_wcr, reset_wcr, 0, 0,  get_wcr, set_wcr }
>  
>  #define PMU_SYS_REG(r)						\
> -	SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_unknown, .visibility = pmu_visibility
> +	SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_pmu_reg, .visibility = pmu_visibility
>  
>  /* Macro to expand the PMEVCNTRn_EL0 register */
>  #define PMU_PMEVCNTR_EL0(n)						\
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(n)),				\
> +	  .reset = reset_pmevcntr,					\
>  	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = (PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + n), }
>  
>  /* Macro to expand the PMEVTYPERn_EL0 register */
>  #define PMU_PMEVTYPER_EL0(n)						\
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)),				\
> +	  .reset = reset_pmevtyper,					\
>  	  .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reg = (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
>  
>  static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> @@ -1595,13 +1632,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSWINC_EL0),
>  	  .access = access_pmswinc, .reg = PMSWINC_EL0 },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSELR_EL0),
> -	  .access = access_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
> +	  .access = access_pmselr, .reset = reset_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID0_EL0),
>  	  .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID1_EL0),
>  	  .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCCNTR_EL0),
> -	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
> +	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reset = reset_unknown, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVTYPER_EL0),
>  	  .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reset = NULL },
>  	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVCNTR_EL0),

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:55   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-07-19 15:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 16:02       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Drop unnecessary masking of PMU registers Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Disabling disabled PMU counters wastes a lot of time Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Remove PMSWINC_EL0 shadow register Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 16:35   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-19 16:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 16:44       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-21  9:30         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=171cca9d-2a6e-248c-8502-feba8ebbe55e@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).