linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:38:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719123902.1493805-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719123902.1493805-1-maz@kernel.org>

A number of the PMU sysregs expose reset values that are not
compliant with the architecture (set bits in the RES0 ranges,
for example).

This in turn has the effect that we need to pointlessly mask
some register fields when using them.

Let's start by making sure we don't have illegal values in the
shadow registers at reset time. This affects all the registers
that dedicate one bit per counter, the counters themselves,
PMEVTYPERn_EL0 and PMSELR_EL0.

Reported-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index f6f126eb6ac1..96bdfa0e68b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -603,6 +603,41 @@ static unsigned int pmu_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return REG_HIDDEN;
 }
 
+static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	u64 n, mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
+
+	/* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
+	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
+		return;
+
+	n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
+	n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
+	if (n)
+		mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
+
+	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
+}
+
+static void reset_pmevcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= GENMASK(31, 0);
+}
+
+static void reset_pmevtyper(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_MASK;
+}
+
+static void reset_pmselr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ARMV8_PMU_COUNTER_MASK;
+}
+
 static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u64 pmcr, val;
@@ -944,16 +979,18 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 	  trap_wcr, reset_wcr, 0, 0,  get_wcr, set_wcr }
 
 #define PMU_SYS_REG(r)						\
-	SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_unknown, .visibility = pmu_visibility
+	SYS_DESC(r), .reset = reset_pmu_reg, .visibility = pmu_visibility
 
 /* Macro to expand the PMEVCNTRn_EL0 register */
 #define PMU_PMEVCNTR_EL0(n)						\
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(n)),				\
+	  .reset = reset_pmevcntr,					\
 	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = (PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + n), }
 
 /* Macro to expand the PMEVTYPERn_EL0 register */
 #define PMU_PMEVTYPER_EL0(n)						\
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(n)),				\
+	  .reset = reset_pmevtyper,					\
 	  .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reg = (PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + n), }
 
 static bool undef_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
@@ -1595,13 +1632,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSWINC_EL0),
 	  .access = access_pmswinc, .reg = PMSWINC_EL0 },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMSELR_EL0),
-	  .access = access_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
+	  .access = access_pmselr, .reset = reset_pmselr, .reg = PMSELR_EL0 },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID0_EL0),
 	  .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCEID1_EL0),
 	  .access = access_pmceid, .reset = NULL },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCCNTR_EL0),
-	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
+	  .access = access_pmu_evcntr, .reset = reset_unknown, .reg = PMCCNTR_EL0 },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVTYPER_EL0),
 	  .access = access_pmu_evtyper, .reset = NULL },
 	{ PMU_SYS_REG(SYS_PMXEVCNTR_EL0),
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 12:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:38 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-07-19 15:55   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Narrow PMU sysreg reset values to architectural requirements Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-19 15:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 16:02       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Drop unnecessary masking of PMU registers Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Disabling disabled PMU counters wastes a lot of time Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Remove PMSWINC_EL0 shadow register Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 16:35   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-19 16:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 16:44       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-07-21  9:30         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-02 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm-arm64: Fix PMU reset values (and more) Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210719123902.1493805-2-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).