linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
@ 2020-01-10 14:21 Johan Jonker
  2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
  2020-01-13  9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: heiko
  Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel

An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
'reg' is a required property
So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.

make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts      | 3 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts     | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
@@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
 	vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3;	/* IO line */
 	vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio;	/* card's power */
 
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	brcmf: wifi@1 {
+		reg = <1>;
 		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
 		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
 		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
@@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
 	sd-uhs-sdr104;
 	vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
 	vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	brcmf: wifi@1 {
+		reg = <1>;
 		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
 		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
 		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
@@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
 	sd-uhs-sdr104;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	brcmf: wifi@1 {
+		reg = <1>;
 		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
 		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
 		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
  2020-01-10 14:21 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node Johan Jonker
@ 2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
  2020-01-13  9:26   ` Heiko Stuebner
  2020-01-13  9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Johan Jonker @ 2020-01-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: heiko
  Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?

Thanks

2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
>
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts      | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts     | 3 +++
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
>  	vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3;	/* IO line */
>  	vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio;	/* card's power */
>
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;
>  	status = "okay";
>
>  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> +		reg = <1>;
>  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
>  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
>  	sd-uhs-sdr104;
>  	vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
>  	vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;
>  	status = "okay";
>
>  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> +		reg = <1>;
>  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
>  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
>  	sd-uhs-sdr104;
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;
>  	status = "okay";
>
>  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> +		reg = <1>;
>  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
>  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
  2020-01-10 14:21 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node Johan Jonker
  2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
@ 2020-01-13  9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johan Jonker
  Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel

Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 15:21:28 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> 'reg' is a required property
> So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
> 
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>

applied for 5.6

Thanks
Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
  2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
@ 2020-01-13  9:26   ` Heiko Stuebner
  2020-01-13 10:27     ` Robin Murphy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2020-01-13  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johan Jonker
  Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel

Hi Johan,

Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi,
> 
> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?

I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
are completely probeable without needing further information and
only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.

So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
connected card - hence should stay in the board file.

Heiko


> 
> Thanks
> 
> 2020-01-10 15:21 GMT+01:00, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>:
> > An experimental test with the command below gives this error:
> > rk3399-firefly.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-orangepi.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-captain.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > rk3399-khadas-edge-v.dt.yaml: dwmmc@fe310000: wifi@1:
> > 'reg' is a required property
> > So fix this by adding a reg property to the brcmf sub node.
> > Also add #address-cells and #size-cells to prevent more warnings.
> >
> > make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts      | 3 +++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | 3 +++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts     | 3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > index 92de83dd4..06043179f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-firefly.dts
> > @@ -669,9 +669,12 @@
> >  	vqmmc-supply = &vcc1v8_s3;	/* IO line */
> >  	vmmc-supply = &vcc_sdio;	/* card's power */
> >
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <0>;
> >  	status = "okay";
> >
> >  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > +		reg = <1>;
> >  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> >  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> >  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > index 4944d78a0..e87a04477 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi
> > @@ -654,9 +654,12 @@
> >  	sd-uhs-sdr104;
> >  	vqmmc-supply = <&vcc1v8_s3>;
> >  	vmmc-supply = <&vccio_sd>;
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <0>;
> >  	status = "okay";
> >
> >  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > +		reg = <1>;
> >  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> >  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> >  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > index 0541dfce9..9c659f311 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts
> > @@ -648,9 +648,12 @@
> >  	pinctrl-names = "default";
> >  	pinctrl-0 = <&sdio0_bus4 &sdio0_cmd &sdio0_clk>;
> >  	sd-uhs-sdr104;
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <0>;
> >  	status = "okay";
> >
> >  	brcmf: wifi@1 {
> > +		reg = <1>;
> >  		compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> >  		interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> >  		interrupts = <RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> >
> 





_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
  2020-01-13  9:26   ` Heiko Stuebner
@ 2020-01-13 10:27     ` Robin Murphy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-13 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heiko Stuebner, Johan Jonker
  Cc: mark.rutland, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel

On 13/01/2020 9:26 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
> 
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
>> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
>> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
>> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
> 
> I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
> in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
> are completely probeable without needing further information and
> only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
> 
> So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
> connected card - hence should stay in the board file.

Indeed, and in general dtc already warns about those properties being 
present unnecessarily, e.g.:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:1812.27-1847.4: Warning 
(avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /mipi@ff968000: unnecessary 
#address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property

Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-13 10:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-10 14:21 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node Johan Jonker
2020-01-10 15:40 ` Johan Jonker
2020-01-13  9:26   ` Heiko Stuebner
2020-01-13 10:27     ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-13  9:24 ` Heiko Stuebner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).