[PATCH V2 1/3] PM: wakeup: Add routine to help fetch wakeup source object.

[PATCH V2 1/3] PM: wakeup: Add routine to help fetch wakeup source object.

[Ran Wang]

Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources
and doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to
do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup
source depending on. And is user's responsibility to identify if this
wakeup source he is interested in.

Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
Change in v2:
	- None.

 drivers/base/power/wakeup.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/pm_wakeup.h   |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
index 5b2b6a0..6904485 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 
@@ -226,6 +227,22 @@ void wakeup_source_unregister(struct wakeup_source *ws)
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wakeup_source_unregister);
+/**
+ * wakeup_source_get_next - Get next wakeup source from the list
+ * @ws: Previous wakeup source object, null means caller want first one.
+ */
+struct wakeup_source *wakeup_source_get_next(struct wakeup_source *ws)
+{
+	struct list_head *ws_head = &wakeup_sources;
+
+	if (ws)
+		return list_next_or_null_rcu(ws_head, &ws->entry,
+				struct wakeup_source, entry);
+	else
+		return list_entry_rcu(ws_head->next,
+				struct wakeup_source, entry);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wakeup_source_get_next);
 
 /**
  * device_wakeup_attach - Attach a wakeup source object to a device object.
@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ static int device_wakeup_attach(struct device *dev, struct wakeup_source *ws)
 		return -EEXIST;
 	}
 	dev->power.wakeup = ws;
+	ws->attached_dev = dev;
 	if (dev->power.wakeirq)
 		device_wakeup_attach_irq(dev, dev->power.wakeirq);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
index 0ff134d..3d300f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
  * @wakeup_count: Number of times the wakeup source might abort suspend.
  * @active: Status of the wakeup source.
  * @has_timeout: The wakeup source has been activated with a timeout.
+ * @attached_dev: The device it attached to
  */
 struct wakeup_source {
 	const char 		*name;
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ struct wakeup_source {
 	unsigned long		wakeup_count;
 	bool			active:1;
 	bool			autosleep_enabled:1;
+	struct device	*attached_dev;
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
@@ -101,6 +103,7 @@ static inline void device_set_wakeup_path(struct device *dev)
 extern void wakeup_source_remove(struct wakeup_source *ws);
 extern struct wakeup_source *wakeup_source_register(const char *name);
 extern void wakeup_source_unregister(struct wakeup_source *ws);
+extern struct wakeup_source *wakeup_source_get_next(struct wakeup_source *ws);
 extern int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev);
 extern int device_wakeup_disable(struct device *dev);
 extern void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable);
-- 
1.7.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V2 2/3] Documentation: dt: binding: fsl: Add 'little-endian' and update Chassis define

[Ran Wang]

By default, QorIQ SoC's RCPM register block is Big Endian. But
there are some exceptions, such as LS1088A and LS2088A, are Little
Endian. So add this optional property to help identify them.

Actually LS2021A and other Layerscapes won't totally follow Chassis
2.1, so separate them from powerpc SoC.

Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
Change in v2:
	- None.

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/rcpm.txt |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/rcpm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/rcpm.txt
index e284e4e..058154c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/rcpm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/fsl/rcpm.txt
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Required properites:
 	* "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-1.0": for chassis 1.0 rcpm
 	* "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.0": for chassis 2.0 rcpm
 	* "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.1": for chassis 2.1 rcpm
+	* "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.1+": for chassis 2.1+ rcpm
 
 All references to "1.0" and "2.0" refer to the QorIQ chassis version to
 which the chip complies.
@@ -27,7 +28,12 @@ Chassis Version		Example Chips
 ---------------		-------------------------------
 1.0				p4080, p5020, p5040, p2041, p3041
 2.0				t4240, b4860, b4420
-2.1				t1040, ls1021
+2.1				t1040,
+2.1+			ls1021a, ls1012a, ls1043a, ls1046a
+
+Optional properties:
+ - little-endian : RCPM register block is Little Endian. Without it RCPM
+   will be Big Endian (default case).
 
 Example:
 The RCPM node for T4240:
-- 
1.7.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Ran Wang]

The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module
(Run Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level
tasks associated with power management such as wakeup source control.

This driver depends on PM wakeup source framework which help to
collect wake information.

Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
Change in v2:
	- Rebase Kconfig and Makefile update to latest mainline.

 drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig  |    8 +++
 drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile |    1 +
 drivers/soc/fsl/rcpm.c   |  124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/rcpm.c

diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
index 61f8e14..8e84e40 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
@@ -29,4 +29,12 @@ config FSL_MC_DPIO
 	  other DPAA2 objects. This driver does not expose the DPIO
 	  objects individually, but groups them under a service layer
 	  API.
+
+config FSL_RCPM
+	bool "Freescale RCPM support"
+	depends on PM_SLEEP
+	help
+	  The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module
+	  (Run Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level
+	  tasks associated with power management, such as wakeup source control.
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
index 803ef1b..c1be6ee 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE)		+= qe/
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPM)			+= qe/
 obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_GUTS)			+= guts.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_MC_DPIO) 		+= dpio/
+obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_RCPM)		+= rcpm.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/rcpm.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/rcpm.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b817319
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/rcpm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// rcpm.c - Freescale QorIQ RCPM driver
+//
+// Copyright 2019 NXP
+//
+// Author: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>,
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+
+#define RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE	7
+
+struct rcpm {
+	unsigned int wakeup_cells;
+	void __iomem *ippdexpcr_base;
+	bool	little_endian;
+};
+
+static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct wakeup_source *ws;
+	struct rcpm *rcpm;
+	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	if (!rcpm)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
+	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
+	while (ws) {
+		ret = device_property_read_u32_array(ws->attached_dev,
+				"fsl,rcpm-wakeup", value, rcpm->wakeup_cells + 1);
+
+		/*  Wakeup source should refer to current rcpm device */
+		if (ret || (np->phandle != value[0])) {
+			dev_info(dev, "%s doesn't refer to this rcpm\n",
+					ws->name);
+			ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		for (i = 0; i < rcpm->wakeup_cells; i++) {
+			/* We can only OR related bits */
+			if (value[i + 1]) {
+				if (rcpm->little_endian) {
+					tmp = ioread32(rcpm->ippdexpcr_base + i * 4);
+					tmp |= value[i + 1];
+					iowrite32(tmp, rcpm->ippdexpcr_base + i * 4);
+				} else {
+					tmp = ioread32be(rcpm->ippdexpcr_base + i * 4);
+					tmp |= value[i + 1];
+					iowrite32be(tmp, rcpm->ippdexpcr_base + i * 4);
+				}
+			}
+		}
+		ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops rcpm_pm_ops = {
+	.prepare =  rcpm_pm_prepare,
+};
+
+static int rcpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device	*dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct resource *r;
+	struct rcpm		*rcpm;
+	int ret;
+
+	rcpm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rcpm), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rcpm)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	if (!r)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	rcpm->ippdexpcr_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
+	if (IS_ERR(rcpm->ippdexpcr_base)) {
+		ret =  PTR_ERR(rcpm->ippdexpcr_base);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rcpm->little_endian = device_property_read_bool(
+			&pdev->dev, "little-endian");
+
+	ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev,
+			"fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells", &rcpm->wakeup_cells);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, rcpm);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rcpm_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.1+", },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcpm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver rcpm_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "rcpm",
+		.of_match_table = rcpm_of_match,
+		.pm	= &rcpm_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = rcpm_probe,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(rcpm_driver);
-- 
1.7.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] PM: wakeup: Add routine to help fetch wakeup source object.

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 459 bytes --]


> --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h

> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ struct wakeup_source {
>  	unsigned long		wakeup_count;
>  	bool			active:1;
>  	bool			autosleep_enabled:1;
> +	struct device	*attached_dev;
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

You might want to format this similary to the rest...
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 968 bytes --]

Hi!


> +
> +struct rcpm {
> +	unsigned int wakeup_cells;
> +	void __iomem *ippdexpcr_base;
> +	bool	little_endian;
> +};

Inconsistent whitespace


> +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	if (!rcpm)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> +	while (ws) {

while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?


> +static int rcpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device	*dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct resource *r;
> +	struct rcpm		*rcpm;
> +	int ret;

Whitespace.

								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V2 1/3] PM: wakeup: Add routine to help fetch wakeup source object.

[Ran Wang]

Hi Pavel,

On Monday, May 20, 2019 05:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> 
> > @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ struct wakeup_source {
> >  	unsigned long		wakeup_count;
> >  	bool			active:1;
> >  	bool			autosleep_enabled:1;
> > +	struct device	*attached_dev;
> >  };
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 
> You might want to format this similary to the rest...

OK, will update, thanks.

Regards,
Ran

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Ran Wang]

Hi Pavel,

On Monday, May 20, 2019 05:39, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> 
> > +
> > +struct rcpm {
> > +	unsigned int wakeup_cells;
> > +	void __iomem *ippdexpcr_base;
> > +	bool	little_endian;
> > +};
> 
> Inconsistent whitespace

OK, will make them aligned.

> 
> > +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev) {
> > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> > +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> > +	int i, ret;
> > +
> > +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	if (!rcpm)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> > +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> > +	while (ws) {
> 
> while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?

Actually, we only pass NULL to wakeup_source_get_next() at very first
call to get 1st wakeup source. Then in the while loop, we will fetch
next source but not 1st, that's different. I am afraid your suggestion
is not quite correct.

> 
> > +static int rcpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > +	struct device	*dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct resource *r;
> > +	struct rcpm		*rcpm;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Whitespace.

OK, will update, thanks for your review.

Regards,
Ran

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1172 bytes --]

Hi!

> > > +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev) {
> > > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > > +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> > > +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> > > +	int i, ret;
> > > +
> > > +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +	if (!rcpm)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> > > +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> > > +	while (ws) {
> > 
> > while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?
> 
> Actually, we only pass NULL to wakeup_source_get_next() at very first
> call to get 1st wakeup source. Then in the while loop, we will fetch
> next source but not 1st, that's different. I am afraid your suggestion
> is not quite correct.

Sorry, I seen your next version before seeing this explanation.

You are right, but the current code is "interesting". What about

    ws = NULL;
    while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ...

then?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Ran Wang]

Hi Pavel,

On Monday, May 20, 2019 16:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > > > +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev) {
> > > > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > > +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > > > +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> > > > +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> > > > +	int i, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > +	if (!rcpm)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> > > > +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> > > > +	while (ws) {
> > >
> > > while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?
> >
> > Actually, we only pass NULL to wakeup_source_get_next() at very first
> > call to get 1st wakeup source. Then in the while loop, we will fetch
> > next source but not 1st, that's different. I am afraid your suggestion
> > is not quite correct.
> 
> Sorry, I seen your next version before seeing this explanation.
> 
> You are right, but the current code is "interesting". What about
> 
>     ws = NULL;
>     while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ...
> 
> then?

Did you mean:
     ws = NULL;
     while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws)) ...

   Yes, that will be the same to my original logic, do you recommend to change
to this? :)

Regards,
Ran

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1690 bytes --]

On Mon 2019-05-20 09:03:50, Ran Wang wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Monday, May 20, 2019 16:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > > > +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev) {
> > > > > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > > > +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > > > > +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> > > > > +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> > > > > +	int i, ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > +	if (!rcpm)
> > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> > > > > +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> > > > > +	while (ws) {
> > > >
> > > > while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?
> > >
> > > Actually, we only pass NULL to wakeup_source_get_next() at very first
> > > call to get 1st wakeup source. Then in the while loop, we will fetch
> > > next source but not 1st, that's different. I am afraid your suggestion
> > > is not quite correct.
> > 
> > Sorry, I seen your next version before seeing this explanation.
> > 
> > You are right, but the current code is "interesting". What about
> > 
> >     ws = NULL;
> >     while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ...
> > 
> > then?
> 
> Did you mean:
>      ws = NULL;
>      while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws)) ...
> 
>    Yes, that will be the same to my original logic, do you recommend to change
> to this? :)

Yes please. It will be less confusing to the reader.

Thanks (and sorry for cross-talk),
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Ran Wang]

Hi Pavel,

On Monday, May 20, 2019 17:08 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > +static int rcpm_pm_prepare(struct device *dev) {
> > > > > > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > > > > +	struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > > > > > +	struct rcpm *rcpm;
> > > > > > +	u32 value[RCPM_WAKEUP_CELL_MAX_SIZE + 1], tmp;
> > > > > > +	int i, ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	rcpm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > > +	if (!rcpm)
> > > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Begin with first registered wakeup source */
> > > > > > +	ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL);
> > > > > > +	while (ws) {
> > > > >
> > > > > while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ?
> > > >
> > > > Actually, we only pass NULL to wakeup_source_get_next() at very
> > > > first call to get 1st wakeup source. Then in the while loop, we
> > > > will fetch next source but not 1st, that's different. I am afraid
> > > > your suggestion is not quite correct.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I seen your next version before seeing this explanation.
> > >
> > > You are right, but the current code is "interesting". What about
> > >
> > >     ws = NULL;
> > >     while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ...
> > >
> > > then?
> >
> > Did you mean:
> >      ws = NULL;
> >      while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws)) ...
> >
> >    Yes, that will be the same to my original logic, do you recommend
> > to change to this? :)
> 
> Yes please. It will be less confusing to the reader.

OK, if no other comment, I will work out v4, fix this and extra ','
 
> Thanks (and sorry for cross-talk),

That's OK, thanks for your time.

Regards,
Ran

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 895 bytes --]

Hi!

> > > > You are right, but the current code is "interesting". What about
> > > >
> > > >     ws = NULL;
> > > >     while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(NULL)) ...
> > > >
> > > > then?
> > >
> > > Did you mean:
> > >      ws = NULL;
> > >      while (ws = wakeup_source_get_next(ws)) ...
> > >
> > >    Yes, that will be the same to my original logic, do you recommend
> > > to change to this? :)
> > 
> > Yes please. It will be less confusing to the reader.
> 
> OK, if no other comment, I will work out v4, fix this and extra ','
>  
> > Thanks (and sorry for cross-talk),
> 
> That's OK, thanks for your time.

You can add

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

to that version.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel