linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: SMMU performance
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:00:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190930110047.GF25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)

Hi,

While using iperf on a platform using the ARM SMMU (v2), I notice the
following behaviour on v5.3 with Will's iommu patch set merged, kernel
lock debugging disabled.

With iommu.passthrough=1, three consecutive runs:
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  4.51 GBytes  3.87 Gbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  4.53 GBytes  3.89 Gbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  4.49 GBytes  3.86 Gbits/sec

With iommu.passthrough=0:
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.77 GBytes  1.52 Gbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.82 GBytes  1.56 Gbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.69 GBytes  1.45 Gbits/sec

Running perf record -a -g ... followed by perf report --no-children
shows:

-   15.72%  iperf            [kernel.vmlinux]    [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestor
   - _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
      - 8.95% arm_smmu_tlb_sync_context
           arm_smmu_iotlb_sync
         - __iommu_dma_unmap
            + 4.54% iommu_dma_unmap_sg
            + 4.41% iommu_dma_unmap_page
      - 2.92% alloc_iova_fast
         - iommu_dma_alloc_iova.isra.26
            + 1.54% iommu_dma_map_sg
            + 1.38% __iommu_dma_map
      - 2.64% free_iova_fast
           iommu_dma_free_iova
         - __iommu_dma_unmap
            + 1.35% iommu_dma_unmap_sg
            + 1.29% iommu_dma_unmap_page

which seems to be pointing to the SMMU code as a bottleneck.

Will suggests that his iommu changes (in his for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates
branch), allows IOMMU driver modifications that may have a beneficial
effect.  Any thoughts?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2019-09-30 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-30 11:00 Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-09-30 11:45 ` SMMU performance Robin Murphy
2019-09-30 11:54   ` Will Deacon
2019-09-30 12:00     ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-02  9:02       ` Will Deacon
2019-10-02 11:09         ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190930110047.GF25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).