linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
@ 2019-10-03 18:53 Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
  2019-10-16  9:53 ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Frank Wunderlich @ 2019-10-03 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Matthias Brugger, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	linux-kernel, Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: Frank Wunderlich

Part 3 from this series [1] was not merged due to wrong splitting
and breaks mt6323 pmic on bananapi-r2

dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not initialized on bananapi-r2

mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0

this patch contains only the probe-changes and chip_data structs
from original part 3 by Hsin-Hsiung Wang

Fixes: a4872e80ce7d2a1844328176dbf279d0a2b89bdb mfd: mt6397: Extract IRQ related code from core driver

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=164155

Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
---
 drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
index 310dae26ddff..b2c325ead1c8 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
@@ -129,11 +129,27 @@ static int mt6397_irq_resume(struct device *dev)
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_irq_suspend,
 			mt6397_irq_resume);
 
+struct chip_data {
+	u32 cid_addr;
+	u32 cid_shift;
+};
+
+static const struct chip_data mt6323_core = {
+	.cid_addr = MT6323_CID,
+	.cid_shift = 0,
+};
+
+static const struct chip_data mt6397_core = {
+	.cid_addr = MT6397_CID,
+	.cid_shift = 0,
+};
+
 static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int id;
 	struct mt6397_chip *pmic;
+	const struct chip_data *pmic_core;
 
 	pmic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pmic)
@@ -149,28 +165,30 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!pmic->regmap)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
+	pmic_core = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	if (!pmic_core)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
-	ret = regmap_read(pmic->regmap, MT6397_CID, &id);
+	ret = regmap_read(pmic->regmap, pmic_core->cid_addr, &id);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(pmic->dev, "Failed to read chip id: %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to read chip id: %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	pmic->chip_id = (id >> pmic_core->cid_shift) & 0xff;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmic);
+
 	pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 	if (pmic->irq <= 0)
 		return pmic->irq;
 
-	switch (id & 0xff) {
-	case MT6323_CHIP_ID:
-		pmic->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0;
-		pmic->int_con[1] = MT6323_INT_CON1;
-		pmic->int_status[0] = MT6323_INT_STATUS0;
-		pmic->int_status[1] = MT6323_INT_STATUS1;
-		ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+	ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
+	switch (pmic->chip_id) {
+	case MT6323_CHIP_ID:
 		ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6323_devs,
 					   ARRAY_SIZE(mt6323_devs), NULL,
 					   0, pmic->irq_domain);
@@ -178,21 +196,13 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	case MT6391_CHIP_ID:
 	case MT6397_CHIP_ID:
-		pmic->int_con[0] = MT6397_INT_CON0;
-		pmic->int_con[1] = MT6397_INT_CON1;
-		pmic->int_status[0] = MT6397_INT_STATUS0;
-		pmic->int_status[1] = MT6397_INT_STATUS1;
-		ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-
 		ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6397_devs,
 					   ARRAY_SIZE(mt6397_devs), NULL,
 					   0, pmic->irq_domain);
 		break;
 
 	default:
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unsupported chip: %d\n", id);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unsupported chip: %d\n", pmic->chip_id);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
@@ -205,9 +215,15 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id mt6397_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397" },
-	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323" },
-	{ }
+	{
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6323",
+		.data = &mt6323_core,
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt6397",
+		.data = &mt6397_core,
+	}, {
+		/* sentinel */
+	}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_of_match);
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-03 18:53 [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core Frank Wunderlich
@ 2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
  2019-10-04 15:51   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-09  5:19   ` Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-16  9:53 ` Lee Jones
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-10-04 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Wunderlich
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

> Part 3 from this series [1] was not merged due to wrong splitting
> and breaks mt6323 pmic on bananapi-r2
> 
> dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not initialized on bananapi-r2
> 
> mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0
> 
> this patch contains only the probe-changes and chip_data structs
> from original part 3 by Hsin-Hsiung Wang
> 
> Fixes: a4872e80ce7d2a1844328176dbf279d0a2b89bdb mfd: mt6397: Extract IRQ related code from core driver
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=164155
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> index 310dae26ddff..b2c325ead1c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,27 @@ static int mt6397_irq_resume(struct device *dev)
>  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_irq_suspend,
>  			mt6397_irq_resume);
>  
> +struct chip_data {
> +	u32 cid_addr;
> +	u32 cid_shift;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_data mt6323_core = {
> +	.cid_addr = MT6323_CID,
> +	.cid_shift = 0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_data mt6397_core = {
> +	.cid_addr = MT6397_CID,
> +	.cid_shift = 0,
> +};

Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Aw: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
@ 2019-10-04 15:51   ` Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-05  8:16     ` Matthias Brugger
  2019-10-09  5:19   ` Frank Wunderlich
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Frank Wunderlich @ 2019-10-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

This Question goes to Hsin-Hsiung Wang ;)

i only took his code (and splitted the 3rd part) to get mt6323 working again without reverting the other 2 Patches

regards Frank


> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. Oktober 2019 um 17:20 Uhr
> Von: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>

> Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-04 15:51   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
@ 2019-10-05  8:16     ` Matthias Brugger
  2019-10-07  3:24       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
  2019-10-07  3:32       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Brugger @ 2019-10-05  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Wunderlich, Lee Jones, Hsin-Hsiung Wang
  Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel



On 04/10/2019 17:51, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> This Question goes to Hsin-Hsiung Wang ;)
> 
> i only took his code (and splitted the 3rd part) to get mt6323 working again without reverting the other 2 Patches
>> regards Frank
> 
> 
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. Oktober 2019 um 17:20 Uhr
>> Von: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
>> Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?
> 

Frank, a quick look at the series would have given you the answer.
@Lee: yes, this change is the preparation to support MT6358:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110515/

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-05  8:16     ` Matthias Brugger
@ 2019-10-07  3:24       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
  2019-10-07  3:32       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-hsiung Wang @ 2019-10-07  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Brugger, Frank Wunderlich, Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/10/2019 17:51, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > This Question goes to Hsin-Hsiung Wang ;)
> > 
> > i only took his code (and splitted the 3rd part) to get mt6323 working again without reverting the other 2 Patches
> >> regards Frank
> > 
Hi Frank,
Sorry for the late reply.
I appreciate your help very much for splitting the code to fix the
issue.
This patch is ok for me.

> > 
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. Oktober 2019 um 17:20 Uhr
> >> Von: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > 
> >> Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?
> > 
> 
> Frank, a quick look at the series would have given you the answer.
> @Lee: yes, this change is the preparation to support MT6358:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110515/
> 

Hi, Lee
MT6358 uses 8 for the cid shift and I will submit next version patch of
mt6358 which is based on Frank's patch.

Hi, Matthias
Many thanks for the explanation.

> Regards,
> Matthias



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-05  8:16     ` Matthias Brugger
  2019-10-07  3:24       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
@ 2019-10-07  3:32       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hsin-hsiung Wang @ 2019-10-07  3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Brugger, Frank Wunderlich, Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 04/10/2019 17:51, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > This Question goes to Hsin-Hsiung Wang ;)
> > 
> > i only took his code (and splitted the 3rd part) to get mt6323 working again without reverting the other 2 Patches
> >> regards Frank

Hi, Frank
Sorry for the late reply.
I appreciate your help very much for splitting the code to fix the
issue.
This patch is ok for me.

> > 
> > 
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. Oktober 2019 um 17:20 Uhr
> >> Von: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > 
> >> Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?
> > 
> 
> Frank, a quick look at the series would have given you the answer.
> @Lee: yes, this change is the preparation to support MT6358:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110515/
> 
Hi, Lee
MT6358 uses 8 for the cid shift and I will submit next version patch of
mt6358 which is based on Frank's patch.

Hi, Matthias
Many thanks for the explanation.

> Regards,
> Matthias



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
  2019-10-04 15:51   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
@ 2019-10-09  5:19   ` Frank Wunderlich
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Frank Wunderlich @ 2019-10-09  5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mediatek, Lee Jones
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, linux-kernel, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-kernel

Should i send patch without the shift (because rest of series gets not merged in 5.4)?

Am 4. Oktober 2019 17:20:01 MESZ schrieb Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
>On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>
>> Part 3 from this series [1] was not merged due to wrong splitting
>> and breaks mt6323 pmic on bananapi-r2
>> 
>> dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not initialized on
>bananapi-r2
>> 
>> mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0
>> 
>> this patch contains only the probe-changes and chip_data structs
>> from original part 3 by Hsin-Hsiung Wang
>> 
>> Fixes: a4872e80ce7d2a1844328176dbf279d0a2b89bdb mfd: mt6397: Extract
>IRQ related code from core driver
>> 
>> [1]
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=164155
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 64
>++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
>> index 310dae26ddff..b2c325ead1c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
>> @@ -129,11 +129,27 @@ static int mt6397_irq_resume(struct device
>*dev)
>>  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_irq_suspend,
>>  			mt6397_irq_resume);
>>  
>> +struct chip_data {
>> +	u32 cid_addr;
>> +	u32 cid_shift;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct chip_data mt6323_core = {
>> +	.cid_addr = MT6323_CID,
>> +	.cid_shift = 0,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct chip_data mt6397_core = {
>> +	.cid_addr = MT6397_CID,
>> +	.cid_shift = 0,
>> +};
>
>Will there be other devices which have a !0 CID shift?
>
>-- 
>Lee Jones [李琼斯]
>Linaro Services Technical Lead
>Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-mediatek mailing list
>Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-03 18:53 [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
@ 2019-10-16  9:53 ` Lee Jones
  2019-10-22  9:46   ` Frank Wunderlich
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-10-16  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Wunderlich
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

> Part 3 from this series [1] was not merged due to wrong splitting
> and breaks mt6323 pmic on bananapi-r2
> 
> dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not initialized on bananapi-r2
> 
> mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0
> 
> this patch contains only the probe-changes and chip_data structs
> from original part 3 by Hsin-Hsiung Wang
> 
> Fixes: a4872e80ce7d2a1844328176dbf279d0a2b89bdb mfd: mt6397: Extract IRQ related code from core driver

I've fixed this line to use the standard formatting.

> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=164155
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-16  9:53 ` Lee Jones
@ 2019-10-22  9:46   ` Frank Wunderlich
  2019-10-24  7:57     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Frank Wunderlich @ 2019-10-22  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mediatek, Lee Jones
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, linux-kernel, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, linux-arm-kernel

Will it be merged on rc-cycle?

I ask because i see it only in mfd-next but not in fixes/torvalds-master

Regards Frank

Am 16. Oktober 2019 11:53:38 MESZ schrieb Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
>On Thu, 03 Oct 2019, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>
>> Part 3 from this series [1] was not merged due to wrong splitting
>> and breaks mt6323 pmic on bananapi-r2
>> 
>> dmesg prints this line and at least switch is not initialized on
>bananapi-r2
>> 
>> mt6397 1000d000.pwrap:mt6323: unsupported chip: 0x0
>> 
>> this patch contains only the probe-changes and chip_data structs
>> from original part 3 by Hsin-Hsiung Wang
>> 
>> Fixes: a4872e80ce7d2a1844328176dbf279d0a2b89bdb mfd: mt6397: Extract
>IRQ related code from core driver
>
>I've fixed this line to use the standard formatting.
>
>> [1]
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=164155
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 64
>++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
>Applied, thanks.
>
>-- 
>Lee Jones [李琼斯]
>Linaro Services Technical Lead
>Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-mediatek mailing list
>Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core
  2019-10-22  9:46   ` Frank Wunderlich
@ 2019-10-24  7:57     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-10-24  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Wunderlich
  Cc: Matthias Brugger, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, Hsin-Hsiung Wang,
	linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

> Will it be merged on rc-cycle?
> 
> I ask because i see it only in mfd-next but not in fixes/torvalds-master

It's been sent to Linus for the -rcs.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-24  7:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-03 18:53 [PATCH] mfd: mt6397: fix probe after changing mt6397-core Frank Wunderlich
2019-10-04 15:20 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-04 15:51   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2019-10-05  8:16     ` Matthias Brugger
2019-10-07  3:24       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
2019-10-07  3:32       ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
2019-10-09  5:19   ` Frank Wunderlich
2019-10-16  9:53 ` Lee Jones
2019-10-22  9:46   ` Frank Wunderlich
2019-10-24  7:57     ` Lee Jones

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).