* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
2020-11-24 14:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2020-11-24 14:23 ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 14:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 22:37 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream Antonio Borneo
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Borneo @ 2020-11-24 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ahmad Fatoum, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team, has, Alexandre Torgue, netdev,
linux-kernel, linux-stm32, Jose Abreu, Maxime Coquelin,
Giuseppe Cavallaro, David S. Miller, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
>
> On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
> > > dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
> > > 5.00a [2].
> > >
> > > Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
> > >
> > > Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
> > >
> > > [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
> > > [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> >
> > Applied to net-next.
>
> This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
>
> @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
>
> The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
>
> @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
>
> I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> change for the correct variant.
Agree,
the patch get applied to the wrong place!
Antonio
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
2020-11-24 14:23 ` Antonio Borneo
@ 2020-11-24 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-24 18:27 ` Antonio Borneo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-24 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Borneo
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team, Ahmad Fatoum, Alexandre Torgue, netdev,
linux-kernel, linux-stm32, Jose Abreu, Maxime Coquelin,
Giuseppe Cavallaro, kuba, has, David S. Miller, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:27 +0100 Antonio Borneo wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > > All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
> > > > dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
> > > > 5.00a [2].
> > > >
> > > > Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
> > > >
> > > > [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
> > > > [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> > >
> > > Applied to net-next.
> >
> > This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> > The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
> >
> > @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> >
> > The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> > flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
> >
> > @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> >
> > I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> > better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> > change for the correct variant.
>
> Agree,
> the patch get applied to the wrong place!
:-o
This happens sometimes with stable backports but I've never seen it
happen working on "current" branches.
Sorry about that!
Would you mind sending the appropriate patches? I can do the revert if
you prefer, but since you need to send the fix anyway..
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
2020-11-24 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-24 18:27 ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Borneo @ 2020-11-24 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team, Ahmad Fatoum, Alexandre Torgue, netdev,
linux-kernel, linux-stm32, Jose Abreu, Maxime Coquelin,
Giuseppe Cavallaro, has, David S. Miller, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 10:20 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:27 +0100 Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > > On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > > > All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
> > > > > dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
> > > > > 5.00a [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
> > > > > [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> > > >
> > > > Applied to net-next.
> > >
> > > This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> > > The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
> > >
> > > @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> > >
> > > The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> > > flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
> > >
> > > @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> > >
> > > I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> > > better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> > > change for the correct variant.
> >
> > Agree,
> > the patch get applied to the wrong place!
>
> :-o
>
> This happens sometimes with stable backports but I've never seen it
> happen working on "current" branches.
>
> Sorry about that!
>
> Would you mind sending the appropriate patches? I can do the revert if
> you prefer, but since you need to send the fix anyway..
You mean sending two patches one for revert and one to re-apply the code?
Or a single patch for the fix?
Antonio
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
2020-11-24 18:27 ` Antonio Borneo
@ 2020-11-24 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-24 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Borneo
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team, Ahmad Fatoum, Alexandre Torgue, netdev,
linux-kernel, linux-stm32, Jose Abreu, Maxime Coquelin,
Giuseppe Cavallaro, has, David S. Miller, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:27:03 +0100 Antonio Borneo wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 10:20 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:23:27 +0100 Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > > > On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> > > > > > All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
> > > > > > dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
> > > > > > 5.00a [2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
> > > > > > [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Applied to net-next.
> > > >
> > > > This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> > > > The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
> > > >
> > > > @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> > > >
> > > > The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> > > > flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
> > > >
> > > > @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> > > > better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> > > > change for the correct variant.
> > >
> > > Agree,
> > > the patch get applied to the wrong place!
> >
> > :-o
> >
> > This happens sometimes with stable backports but I've never seen it
> > happen working on "current" branches.
> >
> > Sorry about that!
> >
> > Would you mind sending the appropriate patches? I can do the revert if
> > you prefer, but since you need to send the fix anyway..
>
> You mean sending two patches one for revert and one to re-apply the code?
> Or a single patch for the fix?
Either way is fine by me. If I was doing it - I'd probably send just one
patch, but if you prefer to revert first - nothing wrong with that.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a
2020-11-24 14:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 14:23 ` Antonio Borneo
@ 2020-11-24 14:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 22:37 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream Antonio Borneo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2020-11-24 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Borneo, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Maxime Coquelin, has, Alexandre Torgue, netdev, linux-kernel,
David S. Miller, Jose Abreu, Pengutronix Kernel Team,
Giuseppe Cavallaro, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
To += Jakub's new address
On 24.11.20 15:15, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
>
> On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>>> All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
>>> dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
>>> 5.00a [2].
>>>
>>> Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
>>>
>>> Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
>>>
>>> [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
>>> [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
>>
>> Applied to net-next.
>
> This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
>
> @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
>
> The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
>
> @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
>
> I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> change for the correct variant.
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream
2020-11-24 14:15 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-24 14:23 ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-24 14:27 ` Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2020-11-24 22:37 ` Antonio Borneo
2020-11-25 10:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-25 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Borneo @ 2020-11-24 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Torgue, Jose Abreu, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum, Antonio Borneo, netdev, linux-kernel, stable,
Maxime Coquelin, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel
Commit 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac
4.10a") was intended to modify the struct dwmac410_ops, but it got
somehow badly merged and modified the struct dwmac4_ops.
Revert the modification in struct dwmac4_ops and re-apply it
properly in struct dwmac410_ops.
Fixes: 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.6+
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
Reported-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <42960ede-9355-1277-9a6f-4eac3c22365c@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
index 002791b77356..ced6d76a0d85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
@@ -1171,7 +1171,6 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
.pcs_get_adv_lp = dwmac4_get_adv_lp,
.debug = dwmac4_debug,
.set_filter = dwmac4_set_filter,
- .flex_pps_config = dwmac5_flex_pps_config,
.set_mac_loopback = dwmac4_set_mac_loopback,
.update_vlan_hash = dwmac4_update_vlan_hash,
.sarc_configure = dwmac4_sarc_configure,
@@ -1213,6 +1212,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
.pcs_get_adv_lp = dwmac4_get_adv_lp,
.debug = dwmac4_debug,
.set_filter = dwmac4_set_filter,
+ .flex_pps_config = dwmac5_flex_pps_config,
.set_mac_loopback = dwmac4_set_mac_loopback,
.update_vlan_hash = dwmac4_update_vlan_hash,
.sarc_configure = dwmac4_sarc_configure,
base-commit: 9bd2702d292cb7b565b09e949d30288ab7a26d51
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream
2020-11-24 22:37 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream Antonio Borneo
@ 2020-11-25 10:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2020-11-25 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ahmad Fatoum @ 2020-11-25 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Borneo, Alexandre Torgue, Jose Abreu, David S. Miller,
Jakub Kicinski
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, stable, Maxime Coquelin, linux-stm32,
linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
On 24.11.20 23:37, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> Commit 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac
> 4.10a") was intended to modify the struct dwmac410_ops, but it got
> somehow badly merged and modified the struct dwmac4_ops.
>
> Revert the modification in struct dwmac4_ops and re-apply it
> properly in struct dwmac410_ops.
>
> Fixes: 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.6+
I don't think extension of dwmac410_ops should be backported to stable.
It's a new feature and should go into net-next like any other.
The fix that could be backported is reverting the unintentional change
of dwmac4.
Cheers,
Ahmad
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> Reported-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
> To: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
> To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> In-Reply-To: <42960ede-9355-1277-9a6f-4eac3c22365c@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> index 002791b77356..ced6d76a0d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
> @@ -1171,7 +1171,6 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> .pcs_get_adv_lp = dwmac4_get_adv_lp,
> .debug = dwmac4_debug,
> .set_filter = dwmac4_set_filter,
> - .flex_pps_config = dwmac5_flex_pps_config,
> .set_mac_loopback = dwmac4_set_mac_loopback,
> .update_vlan_hash = dwmac4_update_vlan_hash,
> .sarc_configure = dwmac4_sarc_configure,
> @@ -1213,6 +1212,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> .pcs_get_adv_lp = dwmac4_get_adv_lp,
> .debug = dwmac4_debug,
> .set_filter = dwmac4_set_filter,
> + .flex_pps_config = dwmac5_flex_pps_config,
> .set_mac_loopback = dwmac4_set_mac_loopback,
> .update_vlan_hash = dwmac4_update_vlan_hash,
> .sarc_configure = dwmac4_sarc_configure,
>
> base-commit: 9bd2702d292cb7b565b09e949d30288ab7a26d51
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream
2020-11-24 22:37 ` [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix incorrect merge of patch upstream Antonio Borneo
2020-11-25 10:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
@ 2020-11-25 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-25 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Borneo
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum, Alexandre Torgue, netdev, linux-kernel, stable,
linux-stm32, Jose Abreu, Maxime Coquelin, David S. Miller,
linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:37:29 +0100 Antonio Borneo wrote:
> Commit 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac
> 4.10a") was intended to modify the struct dwmac410_ops, but it got
> somehow badly merged and modified the struct dwmac4_ops.
>
> Revert the modification in struct dwmac4_ops and re-apply it
> properly in struct dwmac410_ops.
>
> Fixes: 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.6+
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> Reported-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Applied, and queued for 5.9 (all other 5.5+ branches are EOL by now).
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread