linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki (arm-next)
@ 2020-01-17  3:35 CKI Project
  2020-01-17 10:24 ` Veronika Kabatova
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: CKI Project @ 2020-01-17  3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: will, catalin.marinas, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Yi Chen, Jianwen Ji, Hangbin Liu, Xiumei Mu


Hello,

We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:

       Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
            Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci

The results of these automated tests are provided below.

    Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
             Merge: OK
           Compile: OK
             Tests: FAILED

All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:

  https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219

One or more kernel tests failed:

    aarch64:
     ❌ Networking UDP: socket
     ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel

We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.

Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.

        ,-.   ,-.
       ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
        `-',-.`-'   Kernel
          ( I )     Integration
           `-'
______________________________________________________________________________

Compile testing
---------------

We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:

    aarch64:
      make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg


Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ Podman system integration test (as root)
       ✅ Podman system integration test (as user)
       ✅ LTP
       ✅ Loopdev Sanity
       ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
       ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
       ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
       ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
       ✅ Networking MACsec: sanity
       ✅ Networking socket: fuzz
       ✅ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test
       ✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
       ✅ Networking route: pmtu
       ✅ Networking route_func: local
       ✅ Networking route_func: forward
       ✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
       ❌ Networking UDP: socket
       ✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
       ✅ L2TP basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
       ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns transport
       ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
       ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
       ✅ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity
       ✅ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf
       ✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
       ✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
       ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
       ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
       🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
       🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
       🚧 ✅ jvm test suite
       🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
       🚧 ✅ LTP: openposix test suite
       🚧 ✅ Networking vnic: ipvlan/basic
       🚧 ✅ iotop: sanity
       🚧 ✅ Usex - version 1.9-29
       🚧 ✅ storage: dm/common

    Host 2:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ xfstests: ext4
       ✅ xfstests: xfs
       ✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
       ✅ lvm thinp sanity
       ✅ storage: software RAID testing
       ✅ stress: stress-ng
       🚧 ✅ IPMI driver test
       🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
       🚧 ✅ Storage blktests

  Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
    💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!

Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.

Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running are marked with ⏱. Reports for non-upstream kernels have
a Beaker recipe linked to next to each host.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki (arm-next)
  2020-01-17  3:35 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki (arm-next) CKI Project
@ 2020-01-17 10:24 ` Veronika Kabatova
  2020-01-17 10:34   ` ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next) Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Veronika Kabatova @ 2020-01-17 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: CKI Project
  Cc: Jianwen Ji, Hangbin Liu, catalin marinas, Yi Chen, Xiumei Mu,
	will, linux-arm-kernel



----- Original Message -----
> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> To: will@kernel.org, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: "Yi Chen" <yiche@redhat.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@redhat.com>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@redhat.com>, "Xiumei Mu"
> <xmu@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 4:35:27 AM
> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki	(arm-next)
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> 
>        Kernel repo:
>        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>             Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
>             for-kernelci
> 
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> 
>     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>              Merge: OK
>            Compile: OK
>              Tests: FAILED
> 
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> 
>   https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219
> 
> One or more kernel tests failed:
> 
>     aarch64:
>      ❌ Networking UDP: socket
>      ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
> 

Hi,

after yesterday's discussions I thought I'd point it out specifically.
These tests did really report a failure and the results are not caused
by the infra issue we were talking about. I'm sure the test maintainers
can help with figuring out if this is something to be concerned with.


Veronika

> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this
> message.
> 
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more
> effective.
> 
>         ,-.   ,-.
>        ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
>         `-',-.`-'   Kernel
>           ( I )     Integration
>            `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Compile testing
> ---------------
> 
> We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:
> 
>     aarch64:
>       make options: -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
> 
> 
> Hardware testing
> ----------------
> We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
> 
>   aarch64:
>     Host 1:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ Podman system integration test (as root)
>        ✅ Podman system integration test (as user)
>        ✅ LTP
>        ✅ Loopdev Sanity
>        ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
>        ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
>        ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
>        ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
>        ✅ Networking MACsec: sanity
>        ✅ Networking socket: fuzz
>        ✅ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test
>        ✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
>        ✅ Networking route: pmtu
>        ✅ Networking route_func: local
>        ✅ Networking route_func: forward
>        ✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
>        ❌ Networking UDP: socket
>        ✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
>        ✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
>        ✅ L2TP basic test
>        ✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
>        ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns transport
>        ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
>        ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
>        ✅ httpd: mod_ssl smoke sanity
>        ✅ tuned: tune-processes-through-perf
>        ✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
>        ✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
>        ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
>        ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
>        🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
>        🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>        🚧 ✅ jvm test suite
>        🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
>        🚧 ✅ LTP: openposix test suite
>        🚧 ✅ Networking vnic: ipvlan/basic
>        🚧 ✅ iotop: sanity
>        🚧 ✅ Usex - version 1.9-29
>        🚧 ✅ storage: dm/common
> 
>     Host 2:
>        ✅ Boot test
>        ✅ xfstests: ext4
>        ✅ xfstests: xfs
>        ✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
>        ✅ lvm thinp sanity
>        ✅ storage: software RAID testing
>        ✅ stress: stress-ng
>        🚧 ✅ IPMI driver test
>        🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
>        🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
> 
>   Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
>     💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing
>     tests!
> 
> Waived tests
> ------------
> If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests
> are
> executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
> their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or
> are
> being fixed.
> 
> Testing timeout
> ---------------
> We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
> finished running are marked with ⏱. Reports for non-upstream kernels have
> a Beaker recipe linked to next to each host.
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next)
  2020-01-17 10:24 ` Veronika Kabatova
@ 2020-01-17 10:34   ` Will Deacon
  2020-01-17 10:57     ` Robin Murphy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-01-17 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Veronika Kabatova
  Cc: Jianwen Ji, Hangbin Liu, catalin marinas, Yi Chen, CKI Project,
	Xiumei Mu, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:24:17AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> > To: will@kernel.org, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: "Yi Chen" <yiche@redhat.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@redhat.com>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@redhat.com>, "Xiumei Mu"
> > <xmu@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 4:35:27 AM
> > Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki	(arm-next)
> > 
> > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > 
> >        Kernel repo:
> >        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> >             Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
> >             for-kernelci
> > 
> > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > 
> >     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> >              Merge: OK
> >            Compile: OK
> >              Tests: FAILED
> > 
> > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> > 
> >   https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219
> > 
> > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > 
> >     aarch64:
> >      ❌ Networking UDP: socket
> >      ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
> > 
> 
> after yesterday's discussions I thought I'd point it out specifically.
> These tests did really report a failure and the results are not caused
> by the infra issue we were talking about. I'm sure the test maintainers
> can help with figuring out if this is something to be concerned with.

Thanks, Veronika -- I was about to mail you to ask! We queued some IP
checksum changes yesterday, so I bet they're the culprit, since this looks
to be related to UDP checksumming.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next)
  2020-01-17 10:34   ` ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next) Will Deacon
@ 2020-01-17 10:57     ` Robin Murphy
  2020-01-17 11:13       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-17 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon, Veronika Kabatova
  Cc: Jianwen Ji, Hangbin Liu, catalin marinas, Yi Chen, CKI Project,
	Xiumei Mu, linux-arm-kernel

On 2020-01-17 10:34 am, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:24:17AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
>>> To: will@kernel.org, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: "Yi Chen" <yiche@redhat.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@redhat.com>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@redhat.com>, "Xiumei Mu"
>>> <xmu@redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 4:35:27 AM
>>> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki	(arm-next)
>>>
>>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>>
>>>         Kernel repo:
>>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>>>              Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
>>>              for-kernelci
>>>
>>> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>>
>>>      Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>>               Merge: OK
>>>             Compile: OK
>>>               Tests: FAILED
>>>
>>> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>>
>>>    https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219
>>>
>>> One or more kernel tests failed:
>>>
>>>      aarch64:
>>>       ❌ Networking UDP: socket
>>>       ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
>>>
>>
>> after yesterday's discussions I thought I'd point it out specifically.
>> These tests did really report a failure and the results are not caused
>> by the infra issue we were talking about. I'm sure the test maintainers
>> can help with figuring out if this is something to be concerned with.
> 
> Thanks, Veronika -- I was about to mail you to ask! We queued some IP
> checksum changes yesterday, so I bet they're the culprit, since this looks
> to be related to UDP checksumming.

Urgh... let me see if I can reproduce something locally - I had iperf3 
running fine in both directions with tx/rx offload disabled, and my 
userspace tests were showing the new routine produce the same sum as the 
generic version for the same buffer, so I wouldn't have expected UDP to 
behave any differently, but I'll dig in and double-check everything...

Thanks,
Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next)
  2020-01-17 10:57     ` Robin Murphy
@ 2020-01-17 11:13       ` Will Deacon
  2020-01-17 12:24         ` Robin Murphy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2020-01-17 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robin Murphy
  Cc: Jianwen Ji, Veronika Kabatova, Hangbin Liu, catalin marinas,
	Yi Chen, CKI Project, Xiumei Mu, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:57:49AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-01-17 10:34 am, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:24:17AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
> > > > To: will@kernel.org, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > > Cc: "Yi Chen" <yiche@redhat.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@redhat.com>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@redhat.com>, "Xiumei Mu"
> > > > <xmu@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 4:35:27 AM
> > > > Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki	(arm-next)
> > > > 
> > > > We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
> > > > 
> > > >         Kernel repo:
> > > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > > >              Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
> > > >              for-kernelci
> > > > 
> > > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > > > 
> > > >      Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> > > >               Merge: OK
> > > >             Compile: OK
> > > >               Tests: FAILED
> > > > 
> > > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> > > > 
> > > >    https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219
> > > > 
> > > > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > > > 
> > > >      aarch64:
> > > >       ❌ Networking UDP: socket
> > > >       ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > after yesterday's discussions I thought I'd point it out specifically.
> > > These tests did really report a failure and the results are not caused
> > > by the infra issue we were talking about. I'm sure the test maintainers
> > > can help with figuring out if this is something to be concerned with.
> > 
> > Thanks, Veronika -- I was about to mail you to ask! We queued some IP
> > checksum changes yesterday, so I bet they're the culprit, since this looks
> > to be related to UDP checksumming.
> 
> Urgh... let me see if I can reproduce something locally - I had iperf3
> running fine in both directions with tx/rx offload disabled, and my
> userspace tests were showing the new routine produce the same sum as the
> generic version for the same buffer, so I wouldn't have expected UDP to
> behave any differently, but I'll dig in and double-check everything...

It could easily be one of the other things I queued yesterday, but I've
pushed out an updated for-kernelci branch with your patch reverted so keep
your UTF-8 eyes peeled to see if we get a big green tick back or not.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next)
  2020-01-17 11:13       ` Will Deacon
@ 2020-01-17 12:24         ` Robin Murphy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robin Murphy @ 2020-01-17 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: Jianwen Ji, Veronika Kabatova, Hangbin Liu, catalin marinas,
	Yi Chen, CKI Project, Xiumei Mu, linux-arm-kernel

On 2020-01-17 11:13 am, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:57:49AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2020-01-17 10:34 am, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:24:17AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "CKI Project" <cki-project@redhat.com>
>>>>> To: will@kernel.org, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>>> Cc: "Yi Chen" <yiche@redhat.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <jiji@redhat.com>, "Hangbin Liu" <haliu@redhat.com>, "Xiumei Mu"
>>>>> <xmu@redhat.com>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 4:35:27 AM
>>>>> Subject: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki	(arm-next)
>>>>>
>>>>> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>>>>
>>>>>          Kernel repo:
>>>>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>>>>>               Commit: b260f5eb4e57 - Merge branch 'for-next/core' into
>>>>>               for-kernelci
>>>>>
>>>>> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>>>>
>>>>>       Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>>>>                Merge: OK
>>>>>              Compile: OK
>>>>>                Tests: FAILED
>>>>>
>>>>> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/387219
>>>>>
>>>>> One or more kernel tests failed:
>>>>>
>>>>>       aarch64:
>>>>>        ❌ Networking UDP: socket
>>>>>        ❌ Networking ipsec: basic netns tunnel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> after yesterday's discussions I thought I'd point it out specifically.
>>>> These tests did really report a failure and the results are not caused
>>>> by the infra issue we were talking about. I'm sure the test maintainers
>>>> can help with figuring out if this is something to be concerned with.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Veronika -- I was about to mail you to ask! We queued some IP
>>> checksum changes yesterday, so I bet they're the culprit, since this looks
>>> to be related to UDP checksumming.
>>
>> Urgh... let me see if I can reproduce something locally - I had iperf3
>> running fine in both directions with tx/rx offload disabled, and my
>> userspace tests were showing the new routine produce the same sum as the
>> generic version for the same buffer, so I wouldn't have expected UDP to
>> behave any differently, but I'll dig in and double-check everything...
> 
> It could easily be one of the other things I queued yesterday, but I've
> pushed out an updated for-kernelci branch with your patch reverted so keep
> your UTF-8 eyes peeled to see if we get a big green tick back or not.

Actually, It's just clicked in my mind that I *did* see NFS problems 
when first booting my big-endian VM to test in, but dismissed it as the 
old "NFS-over-UDP is flaky on the office network" issue and having 
forgotten to add the ",tcp" option as usual. Now I'm about 90% certain 
it will be my fault, and of where I slipped up. Expect a patch later 
this afternoon...

Thanks,
Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-17 12:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-17  3:35 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki (arm-next) CKI Project
2020-01-17 10:24 ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-01-17 10:34   ` ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.0-rc6-b260f5e.cki?(arm-next) Will Deacon
2020-01-17 10:57     ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-17 11:13       ` Will Deacon
2020-01-17 12:24         ` Robin Murphy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).