* [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
@ 2020-01-17 13:30 Amol Grover
2020-01-17 18:24 ` santosh.shilimkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amol Grover @ 2020-01-17 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Santosh Shilimkar
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, Amol Grover, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
Joel Fernandes, linux-kernel-mentees, Madhuparna Bhowmik
inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
of knav_dev_lock.
Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
implicitly checked for.
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
index 1ccc9064e1eb..37f3db6c041c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
static struct knav_device *kdev;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
+#define knav_dev_lock_held() \
+ lockdep_is_held(&knav_dev_lock)
/* Queue manager register indices in DTS */
#define KNAV_QUEUE_PEEK_REG_INDEX 0
@@ -52,8 +54,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
#define knav_queue_idx_to_inst(kdev, idx) \
(kdev->instances + (idx << kdev->inst_shift))
-#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list)
+#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list, \
+ knav_dev_lock_held())
#define for_each_instance(idx, inst, kdev) \
for (idx = 0, inst = kdev->instances; \
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
2020-01-17 13:30 [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists Amol Grover
@ 2020-01-17 18:24 ` santosh.shilimkar
2020-01-17 19:25 ` Olof Johansson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: santosh.shilimkar @ 2020-01-17 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amol Grover, arm-soc
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
Santosh Shilimkar, Joel Fernandes, linux-kernel-mentees,
Madhuparna Bhowmik
On 1/17/20 5:30 AM, Amol Grover wrote:
> inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> of knav_dev_lock.
>
> Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
>
> Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
> implicitly checked for.
>
Looks fine to me.
Hi Olof, Arnd,
Can you please pick this one and apply to your driver-soc branch ?
I already sent out pull request and hence the request.
regards,
Santosh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
2020-01-17 18:24 ` santosh.shilimkar
@ 2020-01-17 19:25 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-18 4:07 ` Amol Grover
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-17 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: santosh.shilimkar
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, Amol Grover, linux-kernel, arm-soc,
Madhuparna Bhowmik, Santosh Shilimkar, Joel Fernandes,
linux-kernel-mentees, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:24:04AM -0800, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> On 1/17/20 5:30 AM, Amol Grover wrote:
> > inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> > outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> > of knav_dev_lock.
> >
> > Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> > lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
> >
> > Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
> > implicitly checked for.
> >
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Hi Olof, Arnd,
> Can you please pick this one and apply to your driver-soc branch ?
> I already sent out pull request and hence the request.
Hi,
Can you please email the whole patch with sign-off to
soc@kernel.org? Otherwise it won't end up in patchwork, which is how we track
patches and pull requests these days.
Thanks,
-Olof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
2020-01-17 19:25 ` Olof Johansson
@ 2020-01-18 4:07 ` Amol Grover
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amol Grover @ 2020-01-18 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olof Johansson
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, santosh.shilimkar, linux-kernel, arm-soc,
Madhuparna Bhowmik, Santosh Shilimkar, Joel Fernandes,
linux-kernel-mentees, linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:25:55AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:24:04AM -0800, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> > On 1/17/20 5:30 AM, Amol Grover wrote:
> > > inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> > > outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> > > of knav_dev_lock.
> > >
> > > Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> > > lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
> > >
> > > Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
> > > implicitly checked for.
> > >
> > Looks fine to me.
> >
> > Hi Olof, Arnd,
> > Can you please pick this one and apply to your driver-soc branch ?
> > I already sent out pull request and hence the request.
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you please email the whole patch with sign-off to
> soc@kernel.org? Otherwise it won't end up in patchwork, which is how we track
> patches and pull requests these days.
>
Thank you Santosh and Olof. I'm resending the patch to soc@kernel.org
as well.
Thanks
Amol
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Olof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
2020-01-18 4:24 Amol Grover
@ 2020-01-18 18:06 ` santosh.shilimkar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: santosh.shilimkar @ 2020-01-18 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amol Grover, Santosh Shilimkar, Olof Johansson
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, linux-kernel, soc, arm, Madhuparna Bhowmik,
Joel Fernandes, linux-kernel-mentees, linux-arm-kernel
On 1/17/20 8:24 PM, Amol Grover wrote:
> inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> of knav_dev_lock.
>
> Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
>
> Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
> implicitly checked for.
>
Thanks.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
> drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> index 1ccc9064e1eb..37f3db6c041c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>
> static struct knav_device *kdev;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
> +#define knav_dev_lock_held() \
> + lockdep_is_held(&knav_dev_lock)
>
> /* Queue manager register indices in DTS */
> #define KNAV_QUEUE_PEEK_REG_INDEX 0
> @@ -52,8 +54,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
> #define knav_queue_idx_to_inst(kdev, idx) \
> (kdev->instances + (idx << kdev->inst_shift))
>
> -#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list)
> +#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list, \
> + knav_dev_lock_held())
>
> #define for_each_instance(idx, inst, kdev) \
> for (idx = 0, inst = kdev->instances; \
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists
@ 2020-01-18 4:24 Amol Grover
2020-01-18 18:06 ` santosh.shilimkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amol Grover @ 2020-01-18 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Santosh Shilimkar, Olof Johansson
Cc: Paul E . McKenney, Amol Grover, santosh.shilimkar, linux-kernel,
soc, arm, Madhuparna Bhowmik, Joel Fernandes,
linux-kernel-mentees, linux-arm-kernel
inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
of knav_dev_lock.
Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
implicitly checked for.
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
index 1ccc9064e1eb..37f3db6c041c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
static struct knav_device *kdev;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
+#define knav_dev_lock_held() \
+ lockdep_is_held(&knav_dev_lock)
/* Queue manager register indices in DTS */
#define KNAV_QUEUE_PEEK_REG_INDEX 0
@@ -52,8 +54,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(knav_dev_lock);
#define knav_queue_idx_to_inst(kdev, idx) \
(kdev->instances + (idx << kdev->inst_shift))
-#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list)
+#define for_each_handle_rcu(qh, inst) \
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(qh, &inst->handles, list, \
+ knav_dev_lock_held())
#define for_each_instance(idx, inst, kdev) \
for (idx = 0, inst = kdev->instances; \
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-18 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-17 13:30 [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists Amol Grover
2020-01-17 18:24 ` santosh.shilimkar
2020-01-17 19:25 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-18 4:07 ` Amol Grover
2020-01-18 4:24 Amol Grover
2020-01-18 18:06 ` santosh.shilimkar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).