From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
rajatxjain@gmail.com, shobhit.srivastava@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
evgreen@google.com, Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
porselvan.muthukrishnan@intel.com
Subject: Re:
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:24:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212102444.GR10400@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3397374-0cb8-cf6c-0555-34541a1c108c@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 2/12/20 12:34 AM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> This patch subject is missing from mail subject.
> I'm thinking can this be done only once after resume and may other LPSS
> blocks need the same? I.e. should this be done in drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c?
On resume we restore the previously saved context, can we be sure that values
we saved during suspend are correct?
If above won't show any issue, it might be best place to have this quirk
applied in intel_lpss_suspend() / intel_lpss_resume() callbacks as Jarkko
suggested.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 22:34 Rajat Jain
2020-02-12 9:30 ` Jarkko Nikula
2020-02-12 10:24 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-14 13:12 Amjad Ouled-Ameur
2022-09-14 13:18 ` Amjad Ouled-Ameur
2021-01-08 10:32 Misono Tomohiro
2021-01-08 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-03 15:27 Gene Chen
2020-03-04 14:56 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-03-04 15:15 ` Re: Lee Jones
2020-03-04 18:00 ` Re: Matthias Brugger
2019-01-07 17:28 [PATCH] arch/arm/mm: Remove duplicate header Souptick Joarder
2019-01-17 11:23 ` Souptick Joarder
2019-01-17 11:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-31 5:54 ` Souptick Joarder
2019-01-31 12:58 ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-02-01 12:32 ` Re: Souptick Joarder
2019-02-01 12:36 ` Re: Vladimir Murzin
2019-02-01 12:41 ` Re: Souptick Joarder
2019-02-01 13:02 ` Re: Vladimir Murzin
2019-02-01 15:15 ` Re: Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-02-01 15:22 ` Re: Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200212102444.GR10400@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@google.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=porselvan.muthukrishnan@intel.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=shobhit.srivastava@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).