linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417002036.24359-3-s-anna@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417002036.24359-1-s-anna@ti.com>

The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply
a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call.
The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is
typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer
will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created
at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were
deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver
probe function.

So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to
keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v1:
 - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor
   series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments
 - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants
v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
 
 	kfree(rproc->firmware);
 	kfree(rproc->ops);
+	kfree_const(rproc->name);
 	kfree(rproc);
 }
 
@@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	if (!rproc)
 		return NULL;
 
-	rproc->name = name;
 	rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
 	rproc->auto_boot = true;
 	rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32;
@@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc;
 	idr_init(&rproc->notifyids);
 
+	rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rproc->name)
+		goto put_device;
+
 	if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
 		goto put_device;
 
-- 
2.26.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-17  0:20 [PATCH 0/2] rproc core patches needed for TI K3 drivers Suman Anna
2020-04-17  0:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-04-21  2:52   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-21 14:12     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-23  5:01       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17  0:20 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2020-04-17 17:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20  4:59   ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200417002036.24359-3-s-anna@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).